References
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Bergstron, C. T., & West, J. (2017). Calling bullshit: Data reasoning in a digital world. Retrieved from https://callingbullshit.org/syllabus.html
- Burke, K. (1984). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Berkley: University of California Press.
- Charney, D. (1996). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. College Composition and Communication, 47(4), 567–593. doi:10.2307/358602
- Charney, D. (2015). Getting to “How do you know?” rather than “So what?” from “What’s new?”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 105–108. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975965
- Flood, A. (2016, November 15). “Post-truth” named word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries. The Guardian. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
- Gibbons, M. (2019). The recalcitrant invention of X-ray images. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 54–68. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1539193
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. doi:10.2307/375964
- Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively: a research agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Scott, R. L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Communication Studies, 18(1), 9–17. doi:10.1080/10510976709362856
- Skinnell, R. (2018). Faking the news: What rhetoric can teach us about Donald J. Trump. Andrews UK Limited. Exeter, UK.