Conceptual Art or Readable Contract: The Use of Comics in Technical Communication

References

• Aoki, K., Boyle, J., & Jenkins, J. (2006). Bound by law? Tales from the public domain. Durham, NC: Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Duke University Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2004). Discourse methods and critical practice in professional communication: The front-stage and back-stage discourse of prognosis in medicine. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(1), 67–111. doi:10.1177/1050651903258127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busé, M. S. (2000). Superman to the rescue, but can he teach mine awareness. Journal of Mind Action, 4(3), 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, S. (2017, March 8). How the 20,699-word iTunes T&Cs became this year’s hottest graphic novel. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/08/terms-and-conditions-itunes-t-and-c-graphic-novel-robert-sikoryak-interview
   Google Scholar
• Coscarelli, J. (2017, March 6). An artist helps iTunes’ user agreement go down easy. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/books/itunes-terms-conditions-comic-book.html
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, E., & Vaast, E. (2009). Tech talk: An investigation of blogging in technology innovation discourse. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(1), 40–60. doi:10.1109/TPC.2008.2012285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. (2000). Integrating rhetorical and literary theories of genre. College English, 62(6), 696–718. doi:10.2307/379009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R., & Smith, M. J. (2009). The power of comics: History, form, and culture. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, W. (1996). Graphic storytelling. Tamarac, FL: Poorhouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, W. (2008). Graphic storytelling and visual narrative: Principles and practices from the legendary cartoonist. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, J., Van Stan, J. T., II, & Elleuche, S. (2018). Communicating science through comics: A method. Publications, 6(38), 1–10. doi:10.3390/publications6030038
   Google Scholar
• Google Chrome team & McCloud, S. (2010). Google chrome. Retrieved August 6, 2019, from http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, P. (2004). Manga: Sixty years of Japanese comics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. (1991). Legal writing/common sense. Technical Communication, 38(3), 396–400.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Harley, B., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse analysis and content analysis: Two solitudes? Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. (1981). The cartoon: Communication to the quick. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, R. (2017, March 7). Artist channels iTunes terms and conditions into graphic novel. Retrieved July 18, 2019 from https://www.adweek.com/creativity/robert-sikoryak-itunes-terms-conditions/
   Google Scholar
• Hosler, J. (2000). Clan Apis. Columbus, OH: Active Synapse.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D. (2007). More than words: Comics as a means of teaching multiple literacies. English Journal, 96(3), 19–25. doi:10.2307/30047289
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D. (2008). Multimodal constructions of self: Autobiographical comics and the case of Joe Matt’s Peepshow. Biography, 31(1), 59–84. doi:10.1353/bio.0.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, D. A. (2000). Telling the investment story: A narrative analysis of shareholder report. The Journal of Business Communication, 37(1), 7–38. doi:10.1177/002194360003700101
   Google Scholar
• Kamen, M. (2017, February 7). Graphic novel based on iTunes T&C is getting a physical release. Retrieved July 18, 2019 from https://www.wired.co.uk/article/itunes-graphic-novel
   Google Scholar
• Laffey, M., & Weldes, J. (2004). Methodological reflections on discourse analysis. Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2001). Can a manual entertain? Intercom, pp. 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndalianis, A. (2011). Why comics studies? Cinema Journal, 50(3), 113–117. doi:10.1353/cj.2011.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsteegh, M. (2009 February). What technical communicators can learn from comics. Intercom, pp. 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, J., & Blyler, N. (1999). Narrative and professional communication. Stamford, CT: Alex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• PS: The preventive maintenance monthly. (2012). Issue 710. Redstone. Arsenal, AL: U.S. Army Materiel Command Logistics Support Activity.
   Google Scholar
• Riesman, A. (2017, March 13). How R. Sikoryak turned the iTunes Terms and Conditions into a comics masterwork. Retrieved July 18, 2019, from http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/03/r-sikoryak-itunes-terms-conditions-comic.html
   Google Scholar
• Russon, C. (2000). Evaluation of the Sara communication initiative: Final summary. Retrieved August 8, 2019, from https://www.unicef.org/lifeskills/files/SaraCommunicationInitiative.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, A. (1978). To lift the curse of legalese—simplify, simplify. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 21(1), 31–32. doi:10.1109/TPC.1978.6592437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikoryak, R. (2017). Terms and conditions: The graphic novel. Montreal, Canada: Drawn & Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, E. B. (2010). Humanizing the Humvee: Personification techniques and visual rhetoric as used in a U.S. Army technical comic book ( Master Thesis). Retrieved from Iowa State University Digital Repository.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (2003). Munitions of the mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present day. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human services. (1961/1981). Dennis the menace takes a poke at poison. Washington, DC: Field Newspaper Syndicate
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human services. (1981). Dennis the menace coping with family stress. Washington, DC: Field Newspaper Syndicate.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF/DFID. (2000). A joint UNICEF/DFID evaluation: 1999 Kosovo crisis response evaluation. Retrieved August 12, 2019, from http://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/files/2000_Kosovo_emerg_rec_347030.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., & Schroeder, A. (2010). Capabilities and roles of enterprise Wikis in organizational communication. Technical Communication, 57(1), 68–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, W. (2017). Optical solutions: Reception of an NSF-funded science comic book on the biology of the eye. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 101–115. doi:10.1080/10572252.2017.1285962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. (2015). The other kind of funnies: Comics in technical communication. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. (2017). The tree of life in popular science: Assumptions, accuracy, and accessibility. In H. Yu & K. Northcut (Eds.), Scientific communication: Practices, theories, and pedagogies (pp. 107–130). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zappen, J. (2000). Mikhail Bakhtin (1895-1975). In M. Moran & M. Ballif (Eds.), Twentieth-century rhetoric and rhetoricians: Critical studies and sources (pp. 7–20). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar