References
- Agboka, G., & Matveeva, N. (Eds.). (2018). Citizenship and advocacy in technical communication: Scholarly and pedagogical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 451–473.
- Barnett, S. (2010). Toward an object-oriented rhetoric: A review of tool being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects and Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things by Graham Harman. Enculturation, 7. Retrieved from http://enculturation.net/toward-an-object-oriented-rhetoric
- Barton, M. D., & Heiman, J. R. (2012). Process, product, and potential: The archeological assessment of collaborative, wiki-based student projects in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 46–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2012.626391
- Bay, J., Johnson-Sheehan, R., & Cook, D. (2018). Design thinking via experiential learning: Thinking like an entrepreneur in technical communication courses. Programmatic Perspectives, 10(1), 172–200.
- Bekins, L., & Williams, S. (2006). Positioning technical communication for the creative economy. Technical Communication, 53(3), 287–295.
- Blakesley, D. (2018). Composing the un/real future. Computers and Composition, 50, 8–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.07.005
- Breaux, C. (2017). Why making? Computers and Composition, 44, 27–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.03.005
- Breuch, L. K. (2019). Involving the audience: A rhetorical perspective on using social media to improve websites. New York, NY: Routledge/ATTW.
- Brown, J., & Rivers, N. (2014). Composing the carpenter’s workshop. O-Zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies, 1, 27–36.
- Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
- Buechley, L. (2013). Closing address. Fablearn. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://edstream.stanford.edu/Video/Play/883b61dd951d4d3f90abeec65eead2911d
- Burnett, R. E., & Duin, A. H. (1993). Collaboration in technical communication: A research continuum. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(1), 5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259309364520
- Campbell, K. S. (1999). Collecting information: Qualitative research methods for solving workplace problems. Technical Communication, 46(4), 532–545.
- Carter, J. (2016). Making, disrupting, innovating. College Composition and Communication, 68(2), 378–408.
- Chong, F. (2016). The pedagogy of usability: An analysis of technical communication textbooks, anthologies, and course syllabi and descriptions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 12–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1113073
- Cooke, L., Dusenberry, L., & Robinson, J. (2020). Gaming design thinking: Wicked problems, sufficient solutions, and the possibility space of games. Technical Communication Quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10572252.2020.1738555
- Craig, J. (2019). Affective materialities: Places, technologies, and development of writing processes. Composition Forum, 41. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/issue/41/affective-materialities.php
- Detweiler, E. (2015). /” and “-”?: An empirical consideration of the relationship between “rhetoric” and “composition. Enculturation, 20. Retrieved from http://enculturation.net/an-empirical-consideration
- Donaldson, J. (2014). The maker movement and the rebirth of constructionism. Hybrid pedagogy. Retrieved from http://hybridpedagogy.org/constructionism-reborn/
- Duin, A., Moses, J., McGrath, M., Tham, J., & Ernst, N. (2017). Design thinking methodology: A case study of “radical collaboration” in the wearables research collaboratory. Connexion: An International Professional Communication Journal, 5(1), 45–74.
- Duin, A. H. (1990). Terms and tools: A theory and research-based approach to collaborative writing. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication (Later Business and Professional Communication Quarterly), 53(2), 45–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999005300209
- Elam-Handloff, J. (2016). Making across the curriculum: DIY culture, makerspaces, and new modes of composition. Gayle morris sweetland digital rhetoric collaborative (DRC). Retrieved from http://www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org/2016/03/03/making-across-the-curriculum-diy-culture-makerspaces-and-new-modes-of-composition/
- Ferro, T., & Zachry, M. (2014). Technical communication unbound: Knowledge work, social media, and emergent communicative practices. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 6–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2014.850843
- Fraiberg, S. (2017). Start-up nation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 350–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695541
- Gerding, J. M., & Vealey, K. P. (2017). When is a solution not a solution? Wicked problems, hybrid solutions, and the rhetoric of civic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 290–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695538
- Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Haas, C., & Witte, S. (2001). Writing as embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(4), 413–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190101500402
- Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. (n.d.). An introduction to design thinking: Process guide. Retrieved from https://dschool.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/designresources/wiki/36873/attachments/74b3d/ModeGuideBOOTCAMP2010L.pdf?sessionID=e62aa8294d323f1b1540d3ee21e961cf7d1bce38
- Hovde, M. R., & Renguette, C. C. (2017). Technological literacy: A framework for teaching technical communication software tools. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(4), 395–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2017.1385998
- Howard, T., & Greer, M. (2011). Innovation and collaboration in product development: Creating a new role for usability studies in educational publishing. In M. Greer & B. Still (Eds.), Usability of complex information systems: Evaluation of user interaction (pp. 67–88). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Johnson-Eilola, J. (1996). Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(3), 245–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq0503_1
- Johnson-Eilola, J. (2012). Polymorphous perversity in texts. Kairos: Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 16(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/16.3/topoi/johnson-eilola/index.html
- Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S. (2013). Solving problems in technical communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Koupf, D. (2017). Proliferating textual possibilities: Toward pedagogies of critical-creative tinkering. Composition Forum, 35, 1–13.
- Kumar, R., & Refaei, B. (2013). Designing a problem-based learning intermediate composition course. College Teaching, 61(2), 67–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2012.741079
- Labriola, J. (2018). Building apps and building empathy: Incorporating design sprints and thinking in the TPC classroom. In S. Miksch, R. Alhmeyrat, E. Dean, & T. Carnegie (Eds.), Proceedings of 2018 council of programs in technical and scientific communication (CPTSC) conference (pp. 26–27), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Retrieved from http://cptsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2018_CPTSC_conference.pdf#page=26
- Lane, L. (2018). Iteration for impact: Exploring design thinking and designing for social change in client projects. In T. K. Fountain & E. L. Angeli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th ACM international conference on the design of communication (Paper No. 17). New York, NY: ACM.
- Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Lauer, C. (2019). Cultivating mindfulness in the user experience of science communication. In D. Richards, T. Amidon, & E. Pflugfelder (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th ACM international conference on the design of communication (Paper no. 14). New York, NY: ACM.
- Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think: The design process demystified. New York, NY: Routledge.
- McKim, R. (1980). Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Melo, M. (2016). Writing is making: Maker culture and embodied learning in the composition classroom. Digital rhetoric collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org/2016/03/04/writing-is-making-maker-culture-and-embodied-learning-in-the-composition-classroom/
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Paul, R., Drake, J. R., & Liang, H. (2016). Global virtual team performance: The effect of coordination effectiveness, trust, and team cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(3), 186–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2583319
- Pope-Ruark, R. (2014). A case for metic intelligence in technical and professional communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 323–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2014.942469
- Pope-Ruark, R. (2019). Design thinking in technical and professional communication: Four perspectives. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 437–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854094
- Rifenburg, M. (2014). Writing as embodied, college football plays as embodied: Extracurricular multimodal composing. Composition Forum, 29. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/issue/29/writing-as-embodied.php
- Rittel, H. W., & Weber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
- Rose, E. (2016). Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653494
- Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
- Schell, J. 2018. Design thinking has a pedagogy problem … and a way forward. Journal of Design and Creative Technologies, Retrieved from https://designcreativetech.utexas.edu/design-thinking-has-pedagogy-problem-way-forward
- Shalamova, N. (2016). Blending engineering content with design thinking and UX to maximize student engagement in a technical communication class. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE international professional communication conference, IPCC, Austin, Texas, USA. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7740493
- Shivers-McNair, A. (2017). Making, marking, mattering: What we can learn about writing, rhetoric, and technology from a makerspace (Doctoral dissertation).
- Shivers-McNair, A., Phillips, J., Campbell, A., Mai, H. H., Yan, A., Macy, J. F., … Guan, Y. (2018). User-centered design in and beyond the classroom: Toward an accountable practice. Computers and Composition, 49, 36–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.05.003
- Spilka, R. (2002). Becoming a profession. In B. Mirel & R. Spilka (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century (pp. 97–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Spinuzzi, C. (2017). Introduction to special issue on the rhetoric of entrepreneurship: Theories, methodologies, and practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 275–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695537
- Spyridakis, J. H. (2014). Identifying new topics in TC curricula: Preparing students for success in a changing world. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(2), 27–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2752853.2752857
- Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 13–30). Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
- Tatzi, D., Hassler, W., Messnarz, B., & Fluhr, H. (2012). The development of a project-based collaborative technical writing model founded on learner feedback in a tertiary aeronautical engineering program. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(3), 279–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.42.3.f
- Tham, J. (2017). Writing in the making: Integrating design thinking, collaboration, and material literacy with technical writing pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on academic makerspaces (Paper no. 48). Cleveland, OH.
- Thompson, C. (2020, April/May). Makers to the rescue. Wired, 18–19.
- Thompson, I. (2001). Collaboration in technical communication: A qualitative content analysis of journal articles, 1990–1999. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(3), 161–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/47.946462
- Vaughn, M. A. (2017). Why making matters: Pedagogy in practice. In Proceedings of international symposium on academic makerspaces (Paper no. 40). Boston, MA.
- Walton, R. (2016). Supporting human dignity and human rights: A call to adoption the first principle of human-centered design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 402–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653496
- Weedon, S., & Fountain, T. K. (2019). Making design thinking genre knowledge: Embodiment, typification, and engineering design. In Proceedings of 2019 IEEE international professional communication conference (pp. 69–70), Aachen, Germany. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=8804514
- West-Puckett, S. (2017). Materializing makerspaces: Queerly composing space, time, and (what) matters Doctoral dissertation.
- Why you should be doing design challenges. (2018). Medium.com. Retrieved from https://www.justinmind.com/blog/why-you-should-be-doing-design-challenges/
- Wible, S. (2020). Using design thinking to teach creative problem solving in writing courses. College Composition and Communication, 71(3), 399–425.
- Wickman, C. (2014). Wicked problems in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(1), 23–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.1.c
- Williams, J., Rice, R., Lauren, B., Morisson, S., Van Winkle, K., & Elliot, T. (2013). Problem-based universal design for learning in technical communication and rhetoric instruction. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 247–261.
- Zachry, M., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2016). Human-centered design and the field of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 392–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653497
- Zhang, Y., & Kitalong, K. S. (2015). Influences on creativity in technical communication: Invention, motivation, and constraints. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 199–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.1043028