Working to Resonate: Rhetorical Mapping of Disciplinary Stances about Technology, Risk, and the Brain

References

• Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• About Us: Mike Males. (n.d.) Youth facts. Retrieved from https://www.youthfacts.org/?page_id=154
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2010). Editor’s note: Special section on the adolescent brain and risk taking. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 3. doi:10.1177/0743558409357231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, K. M. (n.d.). College of criminology & criminal justice, Florida State University. Retrieved from https://criminology.fsu.edu/faculty-and-staff/kevin-beaver
   Google Scholar
• Blum, R. W. (n.d.). Johns hopkins bloomberg school of public health. Retrieved from https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/1441/robert-w-blum.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. (2016). Value arguments in science research articles. Written Communication, 33(3), 302–327. doi:10.1177/0741088316653394
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2001). Shaping science with rhetoric: The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, F. (2012). Disciplinarity and the growth of knowledge. Social Epistemology, 26(3–4), 331–350. doi:10.1080/02691728.2012.727192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLisi, M., Wright, J. P., Vaughn, M. G., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). Nature and nurture by definition means both: A response to Males. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 24–30. doi:10.1177/0743558409353063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLisi, M. (n.d.). Iowa State University, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice. Retrieved from https://soc-cj.iastate.edu/directory/matthew-delisi/
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D. (2018). Going rogue: How I became a communication specialist in an engineering department. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 336–342. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1518511
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. (2017). The future of interdisciplinarity: An introduction to the 2nd edition. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. C. D. S. Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed., pp. 3–8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gere, A. R., Swofford, S. C., Silver, N., & Pugh, M. (2015). Interrogating disciplines/disciplinary in WAC/WID: An institutional study. College Composition and Communication, 67(2), 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk Druschke, C., Reynolds, N., Morton-Aiken, J., Lofgren, I. E., Karraker, N. E., & McWilliams, S. R. (2018). Better science through rhetoric: A new model and pilot program for training graduate student science writers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 175–190. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1425735
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2015). The politics of pain medicine: A rhetorical-ontological inquiry. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, D. R. (2016). The extent of engagement, the means of invention: Measuring debate about mirror neurons in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Science Communication, 15(2), 1–17. doi:10.22323/2.15020201
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, R. M. (2015). Topoi and the reconciliation of expertise: A model for the development of rhetorical commonplaces in public policy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(1), 57–75. doi:10.2190/TW.45.1.d
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Davidson, W., & Omizo, R. (2017). Genre signals in textual typologies. In L. Walsh & C. Boyle (Eds.), Topologies as techniques for a post-critical rhetoric (pp. 99–124). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, J., & Appelbaum, L. G. (2010). ‘This is your brain on rhetoric’: Research directions for neurorhetorics. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 40(5), 411–437. doi:10.1080/02773945.2010.516303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. B., Sudhinaraset, M., & Blum, R. W. (2010). Neuromaturation and adolescent risk taking: Why development is not determinism. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 4–23. doi:10.1177/0743558409353339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. B. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/profiles/details/sara-johnson
   Google Scholar
• Journet, D. (1993). Interdisciplinary discourse and “boundary rhetoric”: The case of S. E. Jelliffe. Written Communication, 10(4), 510–541. doi:10.1177/0741088393010004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Males, M. (2009). Does the adolescent brain make risk taking inevitable?: A skeptical appraisal. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/0743558408326913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Males, M. A. (2010). Is jumping off the roof always a bad idea? A rejoinder on risk taking and the adolescent brain. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 48–63. doi:10.1177/0743558409353780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May Sudhinaraset. (n.d.). UCLA fielding school of public health. Retrieved from https://ph.ucla.edu/faculty/sudhinaraset
   Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., Silka, L., & Lindenfeld, L. (2014). Interdisciplinarity and actionable science: Exploring the generative potential in difference. Journal of Community Practice, 22(1–2), 189–209. doi:10.1080/10705422.2014.901264
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). A study of interactions: Emerging issues in the science of adolescence workshop summary. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2016). The social life of DNA : Race, reparations, and reconciliation after the genome. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Post, R. (2009). Debating disciplinarity. Critical Inquiry, 35(4), 749–770. doi:10.1086/599580
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. E. (2013). Law, race, and biotechnology: Toward a biopolitical and transdisciplinary paradigm. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9(1), 149–166. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134009
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. G. (2013). Common topics and commonplaces of environmental rhetoric. Written Communication, 30(1), 91–131. doi:10.1177/0741088312465376
   Google Scholar
• Roundtree, A. K. (2021). Testing facial recognition software for young adults and adolescents: An integrative review. HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Trust, 23rd HCI International Conference July 24-29, 2021 Virtual. In A. Moallem (Ed.), (pp. 50–65). Washington, D.C.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sercombe, H. (2010). The gift and the trap: Working the “teen brain” into our concept of youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 31–47. doi:10.1177/0743558409353065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sercombe, H. (n.d.) Linkedin profile. Retrieved from https://au.linkedin.com/in/howardsercombe.
   Google Scholar
• St.Amant, K., & Graham, S. S. (2019). Research that resonates: A perspective on durable and portable approaches to scholarship in technical communication and rhetoric of science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 99–111. doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1591118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stember, M. (1991). Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. The Social Science Journal, 28(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham, J. C. K., Rosselot-Merritt, J., Veeramoothoo, S. C., Bollig, N. W., & Duin, A. H. (2020). Toward a radical collaboratory model for graduate research education: A collaborative autoethnography. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 341–357. doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1713404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M. (n.d.). College for public health and social justice, Saint Louis University. Retrieved from https://www.slu.edu/public-health-social-justice/faculty/vaughn-michael-1.php
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, L. (2010). The common topoi of STEM discourse: An apologia and methodological proposal, with pilot survey. Written Communication, 27(1), 120–156. doi:10.1177/0741088309353501
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, L. (2018). Visual invention and the composition of scientific research graphics: A topological approach. Written Communication, 35(1), 3–31. doi:10.1177/0741088317735837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, H. A. (2006). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. P. (n.d.). University of Cincinnati Research Directory. Retrieved from https://researchdirectory.uc.edu/p/wrightww
   Google Scholar