Unofficial Vaccine Advocates: Technical Communication, Localization, and Care by COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participants

References

• Alexander, J., & Edenfield, A. C. (2021). Health and wellness as resistance: Tactical folk medicine. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 241–256. doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.1930181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduser, L. (2017). Living chronic: Agency and expertise in the rhetoric of Diabetes. Columbus: Ohio State UP.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E., & Eggly, S. (2009). Ethical or unethical persuasion?: The rhetoric of offers to participate in clinical trials. Written Communication, 26(3), 295–319. doi:10.1177/0741088309336936
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, T., Capan, E., Larsen, B., Preston, R., & Sparby, E. M. (2021). Tactical risk communication: Observations from teaching and learning about crisis communication during COVID-19. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(2), 175–189. doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.2008509
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. (2021). Rhetorical body work: Professional embodiment in health provider education and the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 157–173. doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1804620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campeau, K. L. (2019). Vaccine barriers, vaccine refusals: Situated vaccine decision-making in the wake of the 2017 Minnesota measles outbreak. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 2(2), 176–207. doi:10.5744/rhm.2019.1007
   Google Scholar
• David, P.-M., Mathiot, B., Thiongane, O., & Graham, J. E. (2021). Under consent: Participation of people with HIV in an Ebola vaccine trial in Canada. BMC Medical Ethics, 22. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00606-6
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2009). Rhetorics of alternative media in an emerging epidemic: SARS, censorship, and extra-institutional risk communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 327–350. doi:10.1080/10572250903149548
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., & Tameris, M. (2018). Clean blood, religion, and moral triage in tuberculosis vaccine trials. Medical Anthropology, 37(8), 708–721. doi:10.1080/01459740.2018.1463528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenfield, A. C., Holmes, S., & Colton, J. S. (2019). Queering tactical technical communication: DIY HRT. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 177–191. doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1607906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. A. (2020). Adverse events: Race, inequality, and the testing of new pharmaceuticals. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., & Lawrence, H. Y. (2020). Rhetorical appeals and tactics in New York Times comments about vaccines: Qualitative analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), E19504. doi:10.2196/19504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler, P. W. (2015). Para-States and medical science: Making African global health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, L., Hausman, B. L., Cashion, M., Lucchesi, N., Patel, K., & Roberts, J. (2015). Vaccination persuasion online: A qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), E133. doi:10.2196/jmir.4153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, B. L. (2017). Immunity, modernity, and the biopolitics of vaccination resistance. Configurations, 25(3), 279–300. doi:10.1353/con.2017.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, B. L. (2019). Anti/Vax: Reframing the vaccination controversy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, B. L., Lawrence, H. Y., Marmagas, S. W., Fortenberry, L., & Dannenberg, C. J. (2020). H1N1 vaccination and health beliefs in a rural community in the southeastern United States: Lessons learned. Critical Public Health, 30(2), 245–251. doi:10.1080/09581596.2018.1546825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinson, K. (2017). Framing illness through Facebook enabled online support groups. Communication Design Quarterly, 4(2b), 22–31. doi:10.1145/3068755.3068758
   Google Scholar
• Holladay, D. (2017). Classified conversations: Psychiatry and tactical technical communication in online spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 8–24. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.125774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). (2021). COVID-19 vaccine monitor. Retrieved from https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/dashboard/kff-covid-19-vaccine-monitor-dashboard/
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, L. R. (2014). Harms of hedging in scientific discourse: Andrew Wakefield and the origins of the autism vaccine controversy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 165–183. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.816487
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, L. R. (2020). Beyond the “hullabaloo” of the vaccine “debate”: Understanding parents’ assessment of risks when making vaccine decisions. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 3(1), 63–92. doi:10.5744/rhm.2020.1003
   Google Scholar
• Larson, H. J. (2020). Stuck: How vaccine rumors start and why they don’t go away. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, H. Y., Hausman, B. L., & Dannenberg, C. J. (2014). Reframing medicine’s publics: The local as a public of vaccine refusal. The Journal of Medical Humanities, 35(2), 111–129. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9278-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence, H. Y. (2018). When patients question vaccines: Considering vaccine communication through a material rhetorical approach. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 1(1), 161–178. doi:10.5744/rhm.2018.1010
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, H. Y. (2020). Vaccine rhetorics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkowski, J. (2014). Confessions of a pharmaceutical company: Voice, narrative, and gendered dialectics in the case of Gardasil. Health Communication, 29(1), 81–92. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.719178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkowski, J. A., & DeTora, L. M. (2019). “Pregnant? You need a flu shot!”: Safety and danger in medical discourses of maternal immunization. In J. White-Farnham, B. S. Finer, & C. Molloy (Eds.), Women’s health advocacy: Rhetorical ingenuity for the 21st Century (pp. 111–121). New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marback, R., & Barton, E. (2019). Why should I really consider this? The rhetoric of patient motives in phase 1 cancer clinical trial consultations. Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, 2(3), 233–258. doi:10.5744/rhm.2019.1012
   Google Scholar
• McCaughey, J. (2021). The rhetoric of online exclusive pumping communities: Tactical technical communication as eschewing judgment. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 34–47. doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1823485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, C. M., & Pool, R. (2017). From ‘trial community’ to ‘experimental publics’: How clinical research shapes public participation. Critical Public Health, 27(1), 50–62. doi:10.1080/09581596.2016.1212161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pengilly, C. (2019). Rhetorics of empowerment for managing lupus pain: Patient-to-patient knowledge sharing in online health forums. In J. White-Farnham, B. S. Finer, & C. Molloy (Eds.), Women’s health advocacy: Rhetorical ingenuity for the 21st Century (pp. 45–58). New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pigozzi, L. (2018). Negotiating informed consent: Bueno aconsejar, mejor remediar. In L. Meloncon & J. B. Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 195–213). New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, B. (1998). Embodied knowledge: The textual representation of embodied sensory information in a dynamic and uncertain material environment. Written Communication, 15(2), 131–169. doi:10.1177/0741088398015002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2015). Boundary work and the construction of scientific authority in the vaccines-autism controversy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/0047281615600638
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. (2005). Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 457–481. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_3
   Google Scholar
• Wentzell, E. (2017). Medical research participation as “Ethical intercorporeality”: Caring for bio-social bodies in a Mexican human papillomavirus (HPV) study. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 31(1), 115–132. doi:10.1111/maq.12326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wentzell, E., & Racila, A. (2021). Collective care amid US individualism through COVID-19 vaccine trial participation. Medical Anthropology, 1–15. doi:10.1080/01459740.2021.1998041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar