Disrupting Textual Regimes of Climate Disaster Recovery Governance Through Translation

References

• Amant, K. S. (2019). The dynamics of—and need to understand—translation and localization in technical communication. In B. Maylath & K. S. Amant (Eds.), Translation and localization: A guide for technical and professional communicators (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baniya, S. (2022). Transnational assemblages in disaster response: Networked communities, technologies, and coalitional actions during global disasters. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 326–342. doi:10.1080/10572252.2022.2034973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios, R. E. (2017). Governing affect: Neoliberalism and disaster reconstruction. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2008). Grassroots literacy writing, identity and voice in Central Africa. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom-Pojar, R. (2018). Translanguaging outside the academy: Negotiating rhetoric and healthcare in the Spanish Caribbean. Urbana, IL: Conference on College Composition and Communication, National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Budach, G., Kell, C., & Patrick, D. (2015). Objects and language in trans-contextual communication. Social Semiotics, 25(4), 387–400. 2015. doi:10.1080/10350330.2015.1059579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, E. (2016). Translingual and decolonial approaches to meaning making. College English, 78(3), 234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs. (2016, August 16). Federal agencies issue joint guidance to help emergency preparedness, response and recovery providers comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-agencies-issue-joint-guidance-help-emergency-preparedness-response-and-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2014). Rhetoric of a global epidemic: Transcultural communication about SARS. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durá, L. (2018). Expanding inventional and solution spaces: How asset-based inquiry can support advocacy in technical communication. In G. Y. Agboka & N. Matveeva (Eds.), Citizenship and advocacy in technical communication (pp. 23–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evia, C., & Patriarca, A. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 340–367. doi:10.1177/1050651912439697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, F. M., & Cadwell, P. (2018). Training citizen translators: Red Cross translation needs and the 55 delivery of a bespoke training on the fundamentals of translation. Special Issue of Translation Spaces, 7(1), 20–43. doi:10.1075/ts.00002.fed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, F., & O’Brien, S. (2019). Translation in cascading crises. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, E. A. (2013). Transcultural risk communication on Dauphin Island: An analysis of ironically located responses to the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 50–66. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.726483
   Google Scholar
• Gilyard, K. (2016). The rhetoric of translingualism. College English, 78(3), 284–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. (2018). Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. (2022). Designing multilingual experiences in technical communication. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L., & Turner, H. N. (2017). Converging fields, expanding outcomes: Technical communication, translation, and design at a non-profit organization. Technical Communication, 64(2), 126–140. 2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L., & Zantjer, R. (2015). Translation as a user-localization practice. Technical Communication, 62(4), 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T. (2007). Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. M., & Eble, M. F. (2018). Introduction: The social justice turn. In A. M. Haas & M. F. Eble (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 3–20). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., & Williams, M. F. (2018). Technologies of disenfranchisement: Literacy tests and black voters in the US from 1890 to 1965. Technical Communication, 65(4), 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism (1st ed.). New York, NY: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, J., & Fitzgerald, S. (2018). Immediate report–final: Hurricane Harvey storm and flood information [Memo]. Retrieved from https://www.hcfcd.org/Portals/62/Harvey/immediate-flood-report-final-hurricane-harvey-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mihut, L. A. (2014). Literacy brokers and the emotional work of mediation. Literacy in Composition Studies, 2(1), 57–79. doi:10.21623/1.2.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, D. (2022, September 21). U.S. Civil Rights Commission sees inequities in FEMA disaster response. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/21/hurricane-fema-poor-disabled-immigrants/
   Google Scholar
• Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The theory and practice of translation. Leiden, NL: E. J. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S., & Federici, F. M. (2020). Crisis translation: Considering language needs in multilingual disaster settings. Disaster Prevention & Management, 29(2), 129–143. doi:10.1108/DPM-11-2018-0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornatowski, C. M., & Bekins, L. K. (2004). What’s civic about technical communication? Technical communication and the rhetoric of “community. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 251–269. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_2
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2014). Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, N. K. (2022). Understanding agency through testimonios: An Indigenous approach to UX research. Technical Communication, 69(4). doi:10.55177/tc986798
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suojanen, T., Koskinen, K., & Tuominen, T. (2015). User-centered translation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tesseur, W. (2022). Translation as social justice: Translation policies and practices in non-governmental organisations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uekusa, S. (2019). Disaster linguicism: Linguistic minorities in disasters. Language in Society, 48(3), 353–375. doi:10.1017/S0047404519000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzella, M. (2017). Making culture relevant in technical translation with dynamic equivalence: The case of bilingual instructions. Rhetoric, Professional Communication and Globalization, 10(1), 54–77.
   Google Scholar
• Vieria, K. (2016). American by Paper: How documents matter in immigrant literacy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Moore, K. R., & Jones, N. N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wierda, L., DayBranch, E., & Jacobs, E. (2023). Community engaged translation of adverse childhood experiences information into locally relevant public health messaging. Annals of Family Medicine, 21(Supplement 1).
   Google Scholar