References
- Avnoon, N., Kotliar, D. M., & Rivnai-Bahir, S. (2023). Contextualizing the ethics of algorithms: A socio-professional approach. New Media & Society, 146144482211457. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221145728
- Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
- Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.
- Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033745
- Conway, M., Oppegaard, B., Bullen, M., Miguel, A., & Brown-Ogilvie, T. (2023). Describing people and portraits through audio description: Preferences of people who are blind, low vision, and deafblind ( Research to practice paper). Helen Keller National Center.
- Conway, M., Oppegaard, B., & Hayes, T. (2020). Audio description: Making useful maps for blind and visually impaired people. Technical Communication, 67(2), 68–85. https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2020/04/28/audio-description-making-useful-maps-for-blind-and-visually-impaired-people/
- Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
- Davenport, T. H., & Mittal, N. (2022). How generative AI is changing creative work. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2022/11/how-generative-ai-is-changing-creative-work
- De Cosmo, L. (2022). Google engineer claims AI chatbot is sentient: Why that matters. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-claims-ai-chatbot-is-sentient-why-that-matters/
- Dilmegani, C. (2023). Generative AI copyright concerns you must know in 2023. AI Multiple. https://research.aimultiple.com/generative-ai-copyright/
- Duncan, M. (2022). Expanding ethical pedagogy in technical communication: Learning from Killer Nanobots. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1977850
- Farhi, P. (2023). A news site used AI to write articles. It was a journalistic disaster. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/01/17/cnet-ai-articles-journalism-corrections/
- Fresno, N., Castellà Mate, J., Matamala, A., & Soler Vilageliu, O. (2015). Audio describing characters: What features do audiences remember? https://ddd.uab.cat/record/131429
- Graham, S. S., & Hopkins, H. R. (2022). AI for social justice: New methodological horizons in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1955151
- Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
- Heath, A. (2024, February 27). Google CEO says Gemini AI diversity errors are ‘completely unacceptable.’ The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/28/24085445/google-ceo-gemini-ai-diversity-scandal-employee-memo
- Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787127
- Huang, K. (2023). Alarmed by A.I. chatbots, universities start revamping how they teach. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technology/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-universities.html
- Iyer, A. (2023). ChatGPT hits ethical roadblock; blocked. Analytics India Mag. https://analyticsindiamag.com/chatgpt-hits-ethical-roadblock-blocked/
- Jones, N. N., Moore, K. R., & Walton, R. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
- Kendall, L. (2011). “White and nerdy”: Computers, race, and the nerd stereotype. The Journal of Popular Culture, 44(3), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2011.00846.x
- Koirala, S., & Oppegaard, B. (2022). The light bulb went on: A historiography-based approach to disentangling audio description’s influential U.S. roots from its common practices. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X221116903
- Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
- Levitt, H. M. (2021). Essentials of critical-constructivist grounded theory research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000231-000
- Maszerowska, A., Matamala, A., & Orero, P. (2014). Audio description: New perspectives illustrated. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Matamala, A., & Orero, P. (2016). Researching audio description: New approaches. Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56917-2
- McPherson, P. (2020). Facebook says technical error caused vulgar translation of Chinese leader’s name. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-facebook-idUSKBN1ZH0IB
- Melonçon, L. (2013). Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231501
- Oppegaard, B., & Miguel, A. (2024). Audio description of gender: Self-description as an evocation of identity. Perspectives, 32(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2022.2116990
- Oppegaard, B., & Rabby, M. (2022). Gamifying good deeds: User experience, agency, and values in play during a descriptathon and beyond. Technical Communication, 69(4), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc124312
- Oppegaard, B., & Rabby, M. (2024). Inclusive measures: Establishing audio description tactics that impact social inclusion. In A. Lancaster & C. King. (Eds.), Amplifying voices in UX: Balancing design and user needs in technical communication (pp. 273–298). SUNY Press. https://bit.ly/amplifyingvoicesinUX
- Osborne, A., & Coombs, D. S. (2013). Performative sport fandom: An approach to retheorizing sport fans. Sport in Society, 16(5), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2012.753523
- Owens, T. J., Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134725
- Ploin, A., Eynon, R., Hjorth, I., & Osborne, M. A. (2022). AI and the arts: How machine learning is changing artistic work ( Report from the Creative Algorithmic Intelligence Research Project). Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/reports/ai-the-arts/
- Rennie, D. L. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as methodological hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104003
- Roose, K. (2022). A.I.-generated art is already transforming work. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/21/technology/ai-generated-art-jobs-dall-e-2.html
- Ross, D., Oppegaard, B., & Willerton, R. (2018). Principles of place: Developing a place-based ethic for discussing, debating, and anticipating technical communication concerns. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(1), 4–26. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8528511
- Rouan, R. (2022, July 27). Republicans mock VP Harris for offering visual description at meeting with disability advocates. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/07/27/harris-gop-disability-blind/10164235002/
- Schwartz, O. (2019, November 25). 2016, Microsoft’s racist chatbot revealed the dangers of online conversation. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/in-2016-microsofts-racist-chatbot-revealed-the-dangers-of-online-conversation
- Simonite, T. (2018, January 11). When it comes to gorillas, Google Photos remains blind. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/when-it-comes-to-gorillas-google-photos-remains-blind/
- Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
- Suleyman, M. (2022, December 28). Humans and AI will understand each other better than ever. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/artificial-intelligence-neural-networks/
- Tu, W., Fang, J., Fangyu, J., Ci, Y., & Ci, Y. (2021). Bibliometric research in the field of artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1883(1), 12165. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1883/1/012165
- Walch, K. (2021, May 6). How to detect bias in existing AI algorithms. Cognilytica. https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/How-to-detect-bias-in-existing-AI-algorithms
- Walton, R., Moore, K. R., & Jones, N. N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.
- WebAIM. (2024, February 22). Screen Reader User Survey No. 10. https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey10/#descriptions
- Wood, G. (2022, July 27). Kamala Harris’s blue suit. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/kamala-harris-pronouns-description-disabilities/670970/
- Wright, D., Malone, E. A., Saraf, G. G., Long, T. B., Egodapitiya, I. K., & Roberson, E. M. (2011). A history of the future: Prognostication in technical communication: An annotated bibliography. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20(4), 443–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2011.596716
- Zdenek, S. (2015). Reading sounds: Closed-captioned media and popular culture. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226312811