SPANISH READABILITY FORMULAS FOR ELEMENTARY-LEVEL TEXTS: A VALIDATION STUDY

References

• Amiran , M. R. and Jones , B. F. 1982 . Toward a new de?nition of readability . Educational Psychologist , 17 : 13 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.) (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chall , J. S. , Bissex , G. L. , Conard , S. S. and Harris-Sharples , S. 1996 . Qualitative assessment of text dif?culty: A practical guide for teachers and writers , Cambridge, MA : Brookline .
   Google Scholar
• Fredericksen , C. H. 1979 . “ Discourse comprehension and early reading ” . In Theory and practice of early reading , Edited by: Resnick , L. B. and Weaver , P. A. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Fry , E. 1968 . A readability formula that saves time . Journal of Reading , 11 : 513 – 516 .
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (1977). Fry’s Readability Graph: Clari?cations, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242-252.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam , B. , Pe?a , S. C. and Mountain , L. 1980 . The Fry graph applied to Spanish readability . The Reading Teacher , 33 : 426 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck , J. E. and Tindal , G. 1992 . Curriculum-based oral reading ?uency norms for students in grades 2-5 . Teaching Exceptional Children , 24 ( 3 ) : 41 – 44 .
   Google Scholar
• Henkin , A. B. , Singleton , C. A. and Nguyen , L. T. 1984 . Seeking goodness of ?t: Measuring the readability of bilingual learning materials . Bilingual Review , 11 ( 3 ) : 9 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Kanellos , N. 1993 . The Hispanic-American almanac , Detroit, MI : Gale Research, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch , W. and van Dijk , T. A. 1978 . Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production . Psychological Review , 85 : 363 – 394 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klare , G. R. 1984 . “ Readability ” . In Handbook of reading research , Edited by: Pearson , P. D. 68l – 744 . New York : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Koretz , D. , Stecher , B. , Klein , S. and McCaffrey , D. 1994 . The Vermont portfolio assessment program: Findings and implications . Education Measurement: Issues and Practice , 13 : 5 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin , G. H. 1969 . SMOG grading--a new readability formula . Journal of Reading , 12 : 639 – 646 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer , B. J. F. 1985 . “ Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems ” . In Understanding expository text , Edited by: Britton , B. K. and Black , J. B. 269 – 304 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Olson, A. V. (1980). Readability concerns for the school librarian (unpublished manuscript). Victoria, BC: Victoria University.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. (Ed.) (1993). Statistical record of Hispanic Americans. Detroit, MI: Gale Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Grif?n, P. (Eds.) (1998) .Preventing reading dif?culties. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spache , G. 1953 . A new readability formula for primary grades reading materials . Elementary English , 53 : 410 – 4l3 .
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, E. W. (1996, April). A report on the reliability of large-scale portfolio assessment for language arts, mathematics, and science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Adams , M. J. 1990 . Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bormuth , J. R. 1966 . Readability: A new approach . Reading Research Quarterly , 1 : 79 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn , M. R. , Good , R. , Knutson , N. , Tilly , D. and Collins , V. 1992 . Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading ?uency: A con?rmatory analysis of its relation to reading . School Psychology Review , 21 : 459 – 480 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell , P. L. 1987 . Readability in ESL . Reading in a Foreign Language , 4 : 2l – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J. E., Ihnot, C., & Rogers, G. H. (1999). ’’Read Naturally’’: A strategy to increase oral reading ?uency. Reading Research & Instruction, 39(1), 27-38.
   Google Scholar
• Ihnot, C. (1992). Read naturally: Teacher modeling and repeated reading. St. Paul, MN: Read Naturally.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper , S. 1983 . Measuring the inference load of a text . Journal of Educational Psychology , 75 : 391 – 401 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding , S. 1951 . Two formulas for estimating the reading dif?culty of Spanish . Educational Research Bulletin , 30 : 117 – l24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnihotri , R. K. and Khanna , A. L. 1988 . Evaluating the readability of school textbooks: An Indian study . Journal of Reading , 35 : 282 – 288 .
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools (pp. 243-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dale , E. and Chall , J. S. 1948 . A formula for predicting readability . Educational Research Bulletin , 27 : 11 – 20, 37-54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry , E. B. 1989 . Reading formulas--aligned but valid . Journal of Reading , 32 : 292 – 297 .
   Google Scholar
• Schatzberg-Smith , K. 1989 . Readability revisited: Antiquated albatross or trusty steed? . Research & Teaching in Developmental Education , 5 : 63 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Vachon , M. K. and Haney , R. E. 1991 . A procedure for determining the level of abstraction of science reading material . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 28 : 343 – 352 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver , C. A. and Kintsch . 1991 . “ Expository text ” . In Handbook of reading research II , Edited by: Barr , R. , Kamil , M. L. , Mosenthal , P. B. and Pearson , P. D. 230 – 245 . New York : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Fountain , J. 1989b . SPANREAD [software manual]. 603 Serenada Dr. , Georgetown, TX : Bibliotechnics .
   Google Scholar
• Tinajero, J. V., & DeVillar, R. A. (Eds.) (2000). The power of two languages 2000: Effective dual-language use across the curriculum for academic success. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Barr , R. and Dreeben , R. 1991 . “ Grouping students for reading instruction ” . In Handbook of reading research , Edited by: Barr , R. , Kamil , M. L. , Mosenthal , P. B. and Pearson , P. D. Vol. 2 , 885 – 910 . New York : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Elbaum , B. , Vaughn , S. , Hughes , M. T. , Moody , S. W. and Schumm , J. S. 2000 . “ How reading outcomes of students with disabilities are related to instructional grouping formats: A meta-analytic review ” . In Issues and research in special education , Edited by: Gersten , R. , Schiller , J. , Schumm , S. and Vaughn . 89 – 120 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Bouf?er , C. 1984 . Predictability: A rede?nition of readability . Australian Journal of Reading , 7 : 125 – 134 .
   Google Scholar
• Chall , J. S. 1984 . “ Readability and prose comprehension continuities and discontinuities ” . In Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose , Edited by: Flood , J. S. Newark, DE : International Reading Association. .
   Google Scholar
• Dolenz, B. (1992, January=February). Factors that attenuate the correlation coef?cient and its analogs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman , M. and Liau , T. L. 1975 . A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring . Journal of Applied Psychology , 60 : 283 – 284 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A. N. (1984). A Spanish-language Fry-type readability procedure: Elementary level. Bilingual Education Paper Series. California State University, Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
   Google Scholar
• Millis, I. V. S., Campbell, J., & Farstrup, A. (1993). National assessment of educational progress 1992 reading report for the nation and the states: Data from the national and trial states assessment. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo , E. B. and Tinajero , J. V. 2000 . “ Literacy instruction through Spanish: Linguistic, cultural, and pedagogical considerations ” . In The power of two languages: Effective dual-language use across the curriculum for academic success. , Edited by: Tinajero , J. V. and DeVillar , R. A. 42 – 53 . New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Valde´s , G. , Barrera , R. and Cardenas , M. 1984 . Constructing matching texts in two languages: The application of propositional analysis . The Journal for the National Association of Bilingual Education , 9 : 3 – l9 .
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A., & Green, G. M. (1988). Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. (1989a). SPANREAD [computer software]. 603 Serenada Dr., Georgetown, TX: Bibliotechnics.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac , S. and Michael , W. B. 1987 . Handbook in research and evaluation , second , San Diego, CA : Robert R. Kapp Publishers. .
   Google Scholar
• Raygor , A. L. 1977 . “ The Raygor readability estimate: A quick and easy way to determine dif?culty ” . Edited by: Pearson , P. D. Reading : Theory, research, and practice (26th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding , S. 1956 . A Spanish readability formula . Modern Language Journal , 40 : 433 – 441 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vari-Cartier , P. 1981 . Development and validation of a new instrument to assess the readability of Spanish prose . Modern Language Journal , 65 : 141 – 148 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar