Write to Read: Investigating the Reading-Writing Relationship of Code-Level Early Literacy Skills

REFERENCES

• Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Au, K. H., Carroll, J. H., & Scheu, J. A. (1997). Balanced literacy instruction: A teacher's resource book. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: A report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, M. (2007). When opportunity knocks: Integrating language arts and the daily calendar. The Reading Teacher, 60, 488–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaiklock, K. E. (2004). The importance of letter knowledge in the relationship between phonological awareness and reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 36–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscolo, P. (2008). Writing in primary school. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 293–309). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherton, S., & Williams, C. (2002). Interactive writing instruction in a first grade Title I literacy program. Journal of Reading Education, 27, 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. D., Crowder, W., Hagan-Burke, S., & Zou, Y. (2009). A comparison of two path models for predicting reading fluency. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, K., Johnson, M. J., & Furgerson, P. (1996). Interactive writing in a primary classroom. The Reading Teacher, 49, 446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1994). The art of teaching writing (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1996). Learning to read: The great debate (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. A. (2006). The effects of an adapted interactive writing, intervention on kindergarten children's phonological awareness, spelling, and early reading development: A contextualized approach to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 714–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K., & McCabe, A. (2001). Bringing it all together: The multiple origins, skills, and environmental supports of early literacy. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 186–202.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. (1989). Teaching them to read. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., Lee, S. W., & Tollefson, N. (2001). A reliability and validity study of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills—Modified. School Psychology Review, 30, 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnan, N., & Dahl, K. (2003). Children's writing: Research and practice. In J. Flood D. Lapp J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 993–1007). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Portalupi, J. (2001). Writing workshop: The essential guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129–155.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Shinn, M., Bratten, J., Shinn, M., Laimon, L., … Flindt, N. (2004). Technical adequacy and decision making utility of DIBELS (Tech. Rep. No. 7). Eugene: university of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Wallin, J., Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). System-wide percentile ranks for DIBELS benchmark assessment. (Tech. Rep. No. 9). Eugene: university of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink-Chorzempa, B., & MacArthur, C. (2003). Primary grade teachers’ instructional adaptations for struggling writers: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and motivation of struggling writers in second grade: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G. (2006). Evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Literacy Support Program. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 351–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G., Jr. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D., Reutzel, D. R., & Fargo, J. D. (2010). Comparing two methods of writing instruction: Effects on kindergarten students’ reading skills. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 327–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juzwik, M. M., Curcic, S., Wolbers, K., Moxley, K. D., Dimling, L. M., & Shankland, R. K. (2006). Writing into the 21st century: An overview of research on writing, 1999–2004. Written Communication, 23, 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A., & Flihan, S. (2000). Writing and reading relationships: Constructive tasks. In R. Indrisano & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 112–139). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• LeVasseur, V. M., Macaruso, P., & Shankweiler, D. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21, 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarrier, A., Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (2000). Interactive writing: How language and literacy come together, K-2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J. (2008). The impact of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25, 462–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinley, W., & Tierney, R. J. (1989). Traversing the topical landscape: Reading and writing as ways of knowledge. Written Communication, 6, 243–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected R: The need for a writing revolution. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing. (2006). Writing and school reform. New York, NY: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (National Institutes of Health Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. M. (2008). Beyond correlational analysis of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): A classification validity study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 542–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. K. (2004). The value of interactive writing as an intervention for the literacy acquisition of struggling first-grade students. In J. R. Dugan P. E. Linder M. B. Sampson B. A. Brancato, & L. Elish-Piper (Eds.), Celebrating the power of literacy (pp. 155–181). Pittsburg, KS: College Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, E., Schaller, M., & Clemens, J. (2008). A closer look at interactive writing. The Reading Teacher, 61, 496–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (1998). Word matters: Teaching phonics and spelling in the reading/writing classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Fingeret, L. (2007). What we have learned since the National Reading Panel: Visions of the next version of Reading First. In M. Pressley A. K. Billman K. H. Perry K. E. Reffitt, & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 216–245). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006). The state of educational intervention research. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2006). The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. In C. MacArthur S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 275–290). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. A. (2003). Effects of alphabet-letter instruction on young children's word recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 41–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, H. L., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). Validity of the Dynamic Indicators for Basic Early Literacy Skills as an indicator of early literacy for urban kindergarten children. School Psychology Review, 35, 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D. M., & Vellutino, F. R. (1996). Prerequisite skills, early instruction, and success in first-grade reading: Selected results from a longitudinal study. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In P. Accardo A. Capute, & B. Shapiro (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 77–121). Timonium, MD: York.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (1984). Nature of the reading-writing relation: An exploratory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 466–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In C. MacArthur S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–183). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (1988). A developmental comparison of three theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 196–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatil, E., Share, D., & Levin, I. (2000). On the contribution of kindergarten writing to grade one literacy: A longitudinal study in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading failure in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Pagnucco, J. R., & Suttles, C. W. (1996). First graders’ reading and writing instruction in traditional and process-oriented classes. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A., & Cramer, B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task compatibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G., & Lonigan, C. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from preread-ers to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11–29). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, F. B., Hill, D. F., Meyer, M. S., & Flowers, D. L. (2005). Predictive assessment of reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 193–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar