The Effects of Self-Questioning on Reading Comprehension: A Literature Review

REFERENCES

• *Baumann, J. F., Seifert-Kessel, N., & Jones, L. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students’ comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 143–172.
   Google Scholar
• *Benito, Y. M., Foley, C. L., Lewis, C. D., & Prescott, P. (1993). The effect of instruction in question-answer relationships and metacognition on social studies comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 16, 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• *Berkeley, S., Marshak, L., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2011). Improving student comprehension of social studies text: A self-questioning strategy for inclusive middle school classes. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cantrell, R. J., Fusara, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• *Chan, L. K. S. (1991). Promoting strategy generalization through self-instructional training in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Crabtree, T., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Konrad, M. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring of story elements on the reading comprehension of high school seniors with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, L. S. (2008). Bridging the pedagogical gap: Intersections between literacy and reading theories in secondary and postsecondary literacy instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 110–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ezell, H. K., Hunsicker, S. A., Quinque, M. M., & Randolph, E. (1996). Maintenance and generalization of QAR reading comprehension strategies. Reading Research and Instruction, 36, 64–81.
   Google Scholar
• *Ezell, H. K., Kohler, F. W., Jarzynka, M., & Strain, P. S. (1992). Use of peer-assisted procedures to teach QAR reading comprehension strategies to third-grade children. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 205–227.
   Google Scholar
• *Fagella-Luby, M., Schumaker, J. S., & Deschler, D. D. (2007). Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story structure pedagogy in heterogeneous secondary literature classes. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 30, 131–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gaultney, J. F. (1995). The effect of prior knowledge and metacognition on the acquisition of a reading comprehension strategy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 142–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Graham, L., & Wong, B. Y. L. (1993). Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension didactic and self-instructional training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hagaman, J. L., Casey, K. J., & Reid, R. (2010). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of young students. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• *Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 222–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (2000). The range of interpretation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14, 379–397.
   Google Scholar
• *Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., & Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Johnson, J. W., Reid, R., & Mason, L. H. (2011). Improving the reading recall of high school students with ADHD. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• *Johnson, L., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M., & Seery, M. E. (2004). Where is the phonics? An updated review on the use of phonics with students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Laidlaw, E. N., Skok, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1993). The effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77, 75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lauterbach, S. L., & Bender, W. N. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction for reading comprehension: A success for high school freshmen. The High School Journal, 79, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• *Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Manset-Williamson, G., Dunn, M., Hinshaw, R., & Nelson, J. M. (2008). The impact of self-questioning strategy use on the text-reader assisted comprehension of students with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 23, 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• *Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mason, L. H., Snyder, K. H., Sukhram, D. P., & Kedem, Y. (2006). TWA + PLANS strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73, 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McCallum, R. S., Krohn, K. R., Skinnder, C. H., Hilton-Prillhart, A., Hopkins, M., Waller, S., & Polite, F. (2011). Improving reading comprehension of at-risk high-school students: The art of reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McCormick, S., & Cooper, J. O. (1991). Can SQ3R facilitate secondary learning disabled students’ literal comprehension of expository test? Three experiments. Reading Psychology, 12, 239–271.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2011). The nation's report card: Reading 2011. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• *Nolan, T. E. (1991). Self-questioning and prediction: Combining metacognitive strategies. Journal of Reading, 35, 132–138.
   Google Scholar
• *Rogevich, M. E., & Perin, D. (2008). Effects on science summarization of reading a comprehension intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders. Exceptional Children, 74, 135–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stahl, K. A. D. (2008). The effects of three instructional methods on the reading comprehension and content acquisition of novice readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 359–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stone, R. H., Boon, R. T., Fore, C., III, & Bender, W. M. (2008). Use of text maps to improve the reading comprehension skills among students in high school with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33, 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Taylor, B. M., & Frye, B. J. (1992). Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• *Taylor, L. K., Alber, S. R., & Walker, D. W. (2002). The comparative effects of a modified self-questioning strategy and story mapping on the reading comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• *Therrien, W. J., & Hughes, C. (2008). Comparison of repeated readings and question generation on students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities, 6, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• *Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. (2006). Effects of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• *Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walker, M. L. (1995). Help for the “fourth-grade slump”—SRQ2R instruction in text structure or main idea. Reading Horizons, 36(1), 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55, 227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar