Literacy and Text Reading in Middle and High School Social Studies and English Language Arts Classrooms

REFERENCES

• Armbruster, B. B. & Gudbrandsen, B. (1986). Reading comprehension instruction in social studies programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(1), 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., Marshak, L., Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (2011). Improving student comprehension of social studies text: A self-questioning strategy for inclusive middle school classes. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 105–113. doi:10.177/0741932510361261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G. & Snow, C. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, S. C., Burns, L. D. & Callaway, P. (2009). Middle- and high-school content area teachers’ perceptions about literacy teaching and learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 76–94. doi:10.1080/19388070802434899
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K. S. (1991). Promoting strategy generalization through self-instructional training in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 427–433. doi:10.1177/002221949102400708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. & Graves, M. F. (1995). Effects of previewing and providing background knowledge on Taiwanese college students’ comprehension of American short stories. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 663–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. & Pimentel, S. (2012). Revised publishers’ criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and literacy, grades 3–12. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Publishers_Criteria_for_3-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G. & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E. & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, B., Lenz, K., Bulgren, J. A., Hock, M. F., Knight, J. & Ehren, B. J. (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. (1978–1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P. & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 7, 279–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, M. F., Cooke, C. L. & LaBerge, M. (1983). Effects of previewing difficult short stories on low ability junior high school students’ comprehension, recall, and attitudes. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 262–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: How to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. Gaithersburg, MD: STATAXIS.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. (2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs, and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 403–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, L. M., Hedrick, W. B. & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261–280. doi:10.1080/10573560590949377
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, D. P. & Wood, D. D. (1990). Observational methods. In A. Bellack M. Hersen A. Kazdin & E. Alan (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (2nd ed., pp. 107–138). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Haeussler-Bohan, C. & Davis, O. L., Jr. (1998). Historical constructions: How social studies student teachers historical thinking is reflected in their writing of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 173–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, R. & Greenleaf, C. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge—of words and the world. American Educator, 27(1), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 209–219. doi:10.1080/10573560590949278
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T. & Torgesen, J. (2008, August). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices (NCEE No. 2008–4027). Retrieved from the Institute of Education Sciences website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/adlit_pg_082608.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J. & Wei, S. (2004). A synthesis of research on graphic organizers and their effect on reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Research methods for primary care (Vol. 3, pp. 31–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53, 253–279. doi:10.3102/00346543053002253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2005). Creating a culture of literacy: A guide for middle and high school principals. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association & Council of Chief School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards initiative: Preparing America's students for college and career. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, M. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content-area classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 229–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, W. D., Young, C. A. & Rickelman, R. J. (2007). Improving middle school professional development by examining middle school teachers’ application of literacy strategies and instructional design. Reading Psychology, 28, 97–130. doi:10.1080/02702710601115497
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. G., Moje, E. B. & Stewart, R. (2001). Exploring the context of secondary literacy: Literacy in people's everyday school lives. In E. B. Moje & D. G. O'Brien (Eds.), Construction of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. 105–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. G., Stewart, R. A. & Moje, E. B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 442–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/eag-2011-en
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 415–432). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. A., Jamieson-Noel, D. & Asselin, M. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty-three Canadian upper-elementary classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 269–286. doi:10.1086/499726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1998). Student teachers thinking historically. Theory & Research on Social Education, 26, 310–341. doi:10.1080/00933104.1998.10505854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. R. & Feathers, K. M. (1983a). The role of reading in content classrooms: Assumptions vs. reality. Journal of Reading, 27, 262–267.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. R. & Feathers, K. M. (1983b). Teacher and student perceptions of content area reading. Journal of Reading, 26, 348–354.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Porche, M. V., Tabors, P. O. & Harris, S. R. (2007). Is literacy enough? Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, P. J. & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers’ and principals’ beliefs about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 221–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Houston, D. D., Rissman, L. M., Decker, S. M., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S. …Lesaux, N. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S. & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M. & Simmons, D. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93. doi:10.1002/rrq.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Swanson, E. A., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G. & Kent, S. C. (in press). Promoting acceleration of comprehension and content through text in high school social studies classes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar