Explaining Variance in Comprehension for Students in a High-Poverty Setting

REFERENCES

• Aber, J. L. (2007, May). Poverty and child development: Scientific advances and policy implications. Paper presented at the National Summit on America's Children, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19, 933–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P. (2004). National Reading Conference policy brief: High stakes testing and reading assessment. Retrieved from http://literacyresearchassociation.org/publications/HighStakesTestingandReadingAssessment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (2013). Summer reading loss. In R. Allington & A. McGill-Franzen (Eds.), Summer reading: Closing the rich/poor achievement gap (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, O., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 252–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basterra, M. D. R., Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (2011). Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (2009). Vocabulary and reading comprehension: The nexus of meaning. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 323–346). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2011). Words Their Way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, A. (2010). Children and adolescents from poverty and reading development: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26, 115–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brice-Heath, S. (1996). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1983)
   Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. Future Child, 7(2), 55–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterji, M. (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 489–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Children's Defense Fund. (2014). The state of America's children. Retrieved from http://www.childrensdefense.org/child-research-data-publications/state-of-americas-children/
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 127–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Researcher, 36, 564–572.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. V. (2013). Heterogeneity or homogeneity: What assessment data reveal about struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2014). Explaining reading: A resource for explicit teaching of the Common Core Standards. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2005). Comprehension of what for what: Comprehension as a nonunitary construct. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 93–104). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition (PPVT-III). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Dutro, E. (2009). Children writing “hard times”: Lived experiences of poverty and the class-privileged assumptions of mandated curriculum. Language Arts, 87, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, M. F., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 25, 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M. (2006). Measuring reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Catts, H. W., & Tomblin, J. B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369–394). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, R. G., Jr., & Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding the Black-White test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 447–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershoff, E. T. (2003). Living at the edge (Research Brief No. 4). New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, E., & Farnia, F. (2014, July). An argument for an expanded SVR framework: The case of recently immigrated adolescent ELLs. Paper presented at the meeting for the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Santa Fe, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, D., & Newcomer, P. (2008). Test of Oral Language Development, Intermediate, Fourth Edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J. J., Supkoff, L. M., Heistad, D., Chan, C. K., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2012). Early reading skills and academic achievement trajectories of students facing poverty, homelessness, and high residential mobility. Educational Researcher, 41, 366–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518818.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. V. (2009). In search of the “simple view” of reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 54–66). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, M., & Hayes, L. (2004). Developmental-spelling research: A systematic imperative. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 216–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Van Den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainz, K., & Pan, Y. (2014). Segregated school effects on first grade reading gains: Using propensity score matching to disentangle effects for African-American, Latino, and European-American students. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 531–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Walpole, S. (2005). A stage-sequential model of reading transitions: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 551–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., & Meenan, C. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 433–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J. (2012). Before and after third grade: Longitudinal evidence for the shifting role of socioeconomic status in reading growth. Reading and Writing, 25, 1725–1746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda, S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerman, L. V. (1991). Alive and well? Research and policy review of health programs for poor young children. New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers' reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2009). Assessment for reading instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. D., Foorman, B. R., Branum-Martin, L., & Taylor, W. P. (2005). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 85–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Trathen, W., Frye, E. M., Kucan, L., Ward, D., Schlagal, R., & Hendrix, M. (2013). The role of reading rate in the informal assessment of reading ability. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52, 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mucherah, W., & Yoder, A. (2008). Motivation for reading and middle school students’ performance on standardized testing in reading. Reading Psychology, 29, 214–235.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbot, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013a). NAEP data explorer. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013b). The nation's report card: A first look: 2013 Mathematics and Reading (NCES 2014–451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The nation's report card: Reading 2013 (NCES 2014–467). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23, 189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Carpenter, R. D. (2004). Children's motivation to read. In J. V. Hoffman & D. L. Schallart (Eds.), The texts in elementary classrooms (pp. 61–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. (2013). Research foundations for the Common Core State Standards in English language arts. In S. Neuman & L. Gambrell (Eds.), Quality reading instruction in the age of Common Core State Standards (pp. 237–262). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polychroni, F., Koukoura, K., & Anagnostou, I. (2006). Academic self-concept, reading attitudes and approaches to learning of children with dyslexia: Do they differ from their peers? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21, 415–430.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Duke, N. K., Fingeret, L., Park, Y., Reffitt, K., Mohan, L. … & Solic, K. L. (2008). Working with struggling readers: Why we must get beyond the simple view and visions of how it might be done. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 522–546). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pungello, E. P., Kupersmidt, J. B., Burchinal, M. R., & Patterson, C. J. (1996). Environmental risk factors and children's achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 32, 755–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V. (1996). Stories, coupons, and the TV Guide: Relationships between home literacy experiences and emergent literacy knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 406–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Rathbun, A. H., & West, J. (2004). From kindergarten through third grade: Children's beginning school experiences (NCES 2004–007). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Schimke, K. (2012, March). Third grade literacy policies: Identification, intervention, retention. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535949.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, S. G., Carlisle, J. F., Scott, S. E., & Zeng, J. (2007). Are fluency measures accurate predictors of reading achievement? The Elementary School Journal, 107, 429–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L., & Leiken, M. (2004). Language impairment at school entry and later reading disability: Connections at lexical versus supralexical levels of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 87–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. D., Speece, D. L., Harring, J. R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency has a role in the simple view of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 108–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children: A report of the National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterbinsky, A. (2007). Words Their Way spelling inventories: Reliability and validity analyses. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Soderstrom, I. (1999). Predicting elementary and secondary school achievement with school-related and demographic factors. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 330–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of Word Reading Efficiency–2. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., Denton, K., & Germino-Hausken, E. (2000). America's kindergarteners (NCES 2000–070). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Blalock, G. (2000). Gray Silent Reading Tests. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2012). Gray Oral Reading Tests–Fifth Edition (GORT-5). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, V. R., Chau, M., & Aratani, Y. (2010). Who are America's poor children? The official story. Retrieved from www.nccp.org/publications/pdf/text_912.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Kuhn, M., … Schwanenflugel, P. (2010). The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension in second-grade students who evidence different oral reading fluency difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zill, N., Moore, K. A., Smith, E. W., Stief, T., & Coiro, M. J. (1995). The life circumstances and development of children in welfare families: A profile based on national survey data. In P. L. Chase-Lansdale & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Escape from poverty: What makes a difference for children (pp. 38–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar