Professional Development to Differentiate Kindergarten Tier 1 Instruction: Can Already Effective Teachers Improve Student Outcomes by Differentiating Tier 1 Instruction?

REFERENCES

• Al Otaiba, S., Clancy-Menchetti, J., & Schatschneider, C. (2006). Examining the effects of professional development designed to improve the effectiveness of early reading instruction for students at-risk for reading difficulties: Experimental and quasi-experimental approaches. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Vol. Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 19. Applications of research methodology (pp. 207–243). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. Elementary School Journal, 111, 535–560. doi:10.1086/659031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J. & Treadway, G. H. (2002). Open Court reading. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of Literacy Collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34. doi:10.1086/653468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Crowe, E. C., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized control study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from 1st through 3rd grade. Psychological Science, 24, 1408–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Ponitz, C. C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P. S. & Schatschneider, C. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38, 85–99. doi:10.3102/0013189x09332373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Schatschneider, C., & Underwood, P. (2007, January 26). Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction. Science, 315, 464–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Piasta, S. B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E. & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child × instruction interactions on first graders’ literacy development. Child Development, 80, 77–100. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8624.2008.01247.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte, K. L., & Hintze, J. M. (2000). The effects of performance feedback and goal setting on oral reading fluency within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 25, 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Croninger, R. G., Rice, J. K., Rathbun, A., & Nishio, M. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 26, 312–324. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., Connor, C. M., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Examining the core: Relations among reading curriculums, poverty, and first through third grade reading Achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 187–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Swanson, E. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2007). Assessment-based instructional coaching provided to reading intervention teachers. Reading and Writing, 20, 569–590. doi:10.1007/s11145–007-9055–0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. A., Fuchs, L., & Vaughn, S. R. (2005). Multi-tiered reading instruction: Linking general education and special education. In S. O. Richardson & J. W. Gilger (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know (pp. 21–43). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Center for Reading Research. (2007). Student Center Activities: Grades K–1 [Instructional routines]. Retrieved from http://www.fcrr.org/curriculum/SCAindex.shtm
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1991). The contribution of skills analysis to curriculum-based measurement in spelling. Exceptional Children, 57, 443–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L., & Vaughn, S. (2006). A response to “Competing views: A dialogue on response to intervention”: Why response to intervention is necessary but not sufficient for identifying students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32(1), 58–61. doi:10.1177/15345084060320010801
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Graves, A. W. (2003). The English-language learner classroom observation instrument for beginning readers. In S. Vaughn & K. L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 111–144). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Harn, B. A., Chard, D. J., Biancarosa, G., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2011). Coordinating instructional supports to accelerate at-risk first grade readers performance: An essential mechanism for effective RTI. Elementary School Journal, 112, 332–354. doi:10.1086/661997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, G., & Hong, Y. (2009). Reading instruction time and homogeneous grouping in kindergarten: An application of marginal mean weighting through stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 54–81. doi:10.3102/0162373708328259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458–492. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Paro, K. M., Hamre, B., Locasale-Crouch, J., Pianta, R. C., Bryant, D., Early, D. & Burchinal, M. (2009). Quality in kindergarten classrooms: Observational evidence for the need to increase children's learning opportunities in early education classrooms. Early Education & Development, 20, 657–692. doi:10.1080/10409280802541965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apolionia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458. doi:10.3102/00346543066004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., O'Connell, A. A., & Levitt, H. (2006). Ability grouping across kindergarten using an early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 339–346. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.339–346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation's report card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., Fulmer, D., Harty, K. R., & Bell, K. M. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and student outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440–455. doi:10.1177/00222194050380050701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Applying Hamlet's question to the ethical conduct of research: A conceptual addendum. American Psychologist, 39, 561–563. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.39.5.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler, J. M. (1982). Age effects on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised tests. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 785–786. doi:10.1037/0022–006X.50.5.785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D. M., Gelzheiser, L. M., Vellutino, F. R., Schatschneider, C., & Sweeney, J. M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers versus direct interventions for children. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 346–359. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, J. R. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45, 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301–315. doi:10.1177/07419325030240050501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Woodruff, T., Murray, C., Wanzek, J., Scammacca, N. & Elbaum, B. (2008). Effects of professional development on improving at-risk students’ performance in reading. In C. R. Greenwood R. R. Kratochwill, & M. Clements (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 115–142). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Woodruff, A. L., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2007). Prevention and early identification of students with reading disabilities. In D. H. Haager S. Vaughn & J. K. Klingner (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 11–27). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2011). Is a three-tier reading intervention model associated with reduced placement in special education? Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 167–175. doi:10.1177/0741932510361267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas, L. B. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 56–63.
   Google Scholar