Graphic Novel Comprehension Among Learners with Differential Cognitive Styles and Reading Abilities

References

• Aiken, K. G. (2010). Superhero history: Using comic books to teach US history. OAH Magazine of History, 24, 41–47. doi:10.1093/maghis/24.2.41
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkakoson, S. (2013) The relationship between strategic reading instruction, student learning of L2‐based reading strategies and L2 reading achievement. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 422–450. doi:10.1111/jrir.12004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleixo, P., & Norris, C. (2010). The comic book textbook. Education and Health, 28, 72–74.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, R., & Nalinci, G. Z. (2014). Development of visual literacy levels scale in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerinou, M., & Ericson, J. (1997). A review of the concept of visual literacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 280–291. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgar, D., Hunt, A., & Kite, Y. (2012). The effect of pleasure reading on Japanese university EFL learners’ reading rates. Language Learning, 62, 665–703. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00651.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, D., & Lundy, K. (2007). Boosting literacy with graphic novels. Austin, TX: Steck-Vaughn.
   Google Scholar
• Brenna, B. (2013). How graphic novels support reading comprehension strategy development in children. Literacy, 47, 88–94. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2011.00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, K. T., & Manning, M. L. (2004). Bringing graphic novels into a school’s curriculum. The Clearing House, 78, 67–72. doi:10.3200/tchs.78.2.67-72
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 175–197. doi:10.1002/rrq.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R., & Brna, P. (1995). Supporting the use of external representations in problem solving: The need for flexible learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6, 239–302.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, P. C. (2003). Graphic novels 101: Selecting and using graphic novels to promote literacy for children and young adults: A resource guide for school librarians and educators. Salt Lake City, UT: Hi Willow Research & Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, W. (1985). Comics and sequential art. Tamarac, FL: Poorhouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5–22. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. (2004). Bold books for innovative teaching. English Journal, 93, 119–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ghavamnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2013). L2 reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners: A think-aloud study. Reading Psychology, 34, 355–378.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. (2002). What teens want. School Library Journal, 48, 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gorzycki, M., Howard, P., Allen, D., Desa, G., & Rosegard, E. (2016). An exploration of academic reading proficiency at the university level: A cross-sectional study of 848 undergraduates. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55, 142–162. doi:10.1080/19388071.2015.1133738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323, 69–71. doi:10.1126/science.1167190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 9, 59–85. doi:10.1080/10573560308203
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2013). UCAS tariff for HKDSE. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/Media/Leaflets/UCAS_factsheet_Mar2013_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hong-Ham, K., & Page, L. (2014). Investigating metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use of EFL Korean university students, Reading Psychology, 35, 195–220. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.675418
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, K. (2004). Build it and they will come: Graphic novels for your collection. School Libraries in Canada Online, 23(3), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, B. D., & Anggoro, F. K. (2012). Comic cognition: Exploring the potential cognitive impacts of science comics. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11, 196–208. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.196
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 431–446. doi:10.1080/095006999290642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Khoii, R., & Forouzesh, Z. (2010). Using comic strips with reading texts: Are we making a mistake? Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1, 168–177. doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2010.0024
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., & Barletta, L. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 108–128. doi:10.1177/00222194060390020101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949–968. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199711)34:9<949::aid-tea7>3.3.co;2-f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–99. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutner, D., & Plass, J. L. (1998). Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior: Development of the Imager/Verbalizer Behavior Observation Scale (VV-BOS). Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 543–557. doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(98)00023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Vol. 1. Basic research (pp. 51–85) New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2004). Effects of comic strips on L2 learners’ reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 225–243. doi:10.2307/3588379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallia, G. (2007). Learning from the sequence: The use of comics in instruction. In ImageText (Vol. 3). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. Retrieved from http://www.english.ufl.edu/imagetext/archives/v3_3/mallia/
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. K., & Davis, C. (2012). A conceptual framework for teaching critical reading to adult college students. Adult Learning, 23, 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, L. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-imager cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 321–336. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzeo, J., Carlson, J. E., Voelkl, K. E., & Lutkus, A. D. (2000). Increasing the participation of special needs students in NAEP: A report on 1996 NAEP research activities (NCES 2000–473). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Merc, A. (2013). The effect of comic strips on EFL reading comprehension. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4, 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Metros, S. E. (2008). The educator’s role in preparing visually literate learners. Theory Into Practice, 47, 102–109. doi:10.1080/00405840801992264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, E., & Marsh, J. (2001). Sending Minnie the minx home: Comics and reading choices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31, 25–38. doi:10.1080/03057640123853
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2007). Optimizing learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 765–781. doi:10.1002/acp.1348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Kelly, J. (2001). Son of invisible art: Graphic novels for libraries. Aylesbury, UK: Library and Information Service for Schools, Buckinghamshire County Library.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. J. (2005). A new measure of verbal–imagery cognitive style: VICS. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1269–1281. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E., Rayner, S. G., & Armstrong, S. J. (2009). Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning styles: Is there really a future? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 518–523. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2009). Cognitive styles, dynamic geometry and measurement performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 5–26. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9139-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25–36. doi:10.1037/0022‐0663.90.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabin, R. (2001). Comics, comix and graphic novels: A history of comic art. London, UK: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E., & Riding, R. (1999). Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional Science, 27, 355–371. doi:10.1007/bf00892031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., Ludewig, U., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 974–989. doi:10.1037/a0037054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (2010). Graphic novels, new literacies, and good old social justice. The ALAN Review, 37(3), 71–75. doi:10.21061/alan.v37i3.a.10
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. S., Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., & Tai, R. (2009). Depth versus breadth: How content coverage in high school science courses relates to later success in college science coursework. Science Education, 93(5), 798–826. doi:10.1002/sce.20328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetana, L., Odelson, D., Burns, H., & Grisham, D. L. (2009). Using graphic novels in the high school classroom: Engaging deaf students with a new genre. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53, 228–240. doi:10.1598/jaal.53.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700–712. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.7.700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnek, H. J. M., & Simon, H. A. (1998). One person, multiple representations: An analysis of a simple, realistic multiple representation learning task. In M. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. A. P. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 197–236). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (2008). Adventures in graphica. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Um, E. R., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 485–498. doi:10.1037/a0026609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Grifith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Zha, P. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 867–887. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, S., & DeCandido, K. R. A. (2001). The 101 best graphic novels. New York, NY: Nantier.Beall.Minoustchine.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxson, L., Cotter, J., & Joy, S. (2011). Beyond the first-year experience: The impact on attrition of student experiences throughout undergraduate degree studies in six diverse universities. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 331–352. doi:10.1080/03075070903581533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. W. L. (2014). When a teacher met a cartoonist: A guide to creating educational graphic novels. Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 12–27. doi:10.1598/rrq.34.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerushalmy, M. (1991). Students perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(1), 42–57. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00223.x
   Google Scholar
• Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. New York, NY: Touchtone Applied Science.
   Google Scholar