Creating a Macrostructure in Academic Writing: Contributions of Tutor–Tutee Interaction When Performing a Text Revision

References

• Alexander, C. (1979). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1964)
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. H. (2002). Better writers: Writing center tutoring and the revision of rough drafts. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/10790195.2002.10850133
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. (1985). Application of self-regulating speech in the basic writing program. Journal of Basic Writing, 4(2), 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1979). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cayer, R. L., & Sacks, R. R. (1979). Oral and written discourse of basic writers: Similarities and differences. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanquay, L., Foulin, J. N., & Fayol, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 513–540.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, F. J. (1986). The topic sentence revisited. College Composition and Communication, 37(4), 431–441. doi:10.2307/357913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykstra, P. D. (1994). Say it, don’t write it: Oral structures as frameworks for teaching writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 13(1), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 400–414. doi:10.2307/356602
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 481–506. doi:10.2307/1170433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freed, A. F., & Ehrlich, S. (Eds.). (2010). “Why do you ask?” The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, E. N. (1978). Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., & Graesser, A. C. (2007). The role of dialogue in reciprocal teaching and naturalistic tutoring. In R. Horowitz (Ed.), Talking texts: How speech and writing interact in school learning (pp. 253–270). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (1984). Orality and literacy in bilingual-bicultural contexts. National Association of Bilingual Education (NABE) Journal, 8(3), 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (1985a). Text Patterns. Part I. Journal of Reading, 28(5), 448–454.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (1985b). Text Patterns. Part II. Journal of Reading, 28(6), 534–541.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (1987). Rhetorical structure in discourse processing. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 117–160). London, UK & San Diego, CA: Academic Press; Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (1991). A reexamination of oral versus silent reading. Text, 11(1), 133–166.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (Ed.). (2007). Talking texts: How speech and writing interact in school learning. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (2015). Oral language: The genesis and development of literacy for schooling and everyday life. In P. D. Pearson & E. Hiebert (Eds.), Research-based practices for teaching common core (pp. 57–75). New York, NY: Teachers College Press; Newark, DE: International Literacy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R. (2016, March). Toward a rhetorical theory of oracy in literacy. Multilingual, multi-cultural, multi-national contextual considerations. Presentation at the National Association of Bilingual Education conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R., & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.). (1987). Comprehending oral and written language. London, UK & San Diego, CA: Academic Press; Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R., & Zhi, M. (2016, August). Reconceptualizing academic L2 writing: Cultural conversational contributions within written language in international assessments. Presentation at the 16th World Congress of Comparative Education Societies, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. A., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limberb, H., Modey, C., & Dyer, J. (2016). “So what do you say is your thesis so far?” Tutor questions in writing tutorials. Journal of Writing Research, 7(3), 371–396. doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.07.3.3
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J., & Thompson, I. K. (2015). Talk about writing: The tutoring strategies of writing center tutors. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103. doi:10.2307/747349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogey, N., & Hartley, J. (2013). To write or to type? The effects of handwriting and word-processing on the written style of examination essays. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 50(1), 85–93. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.748334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newkirk, T. (1995). The writing conference as performance. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(2), 193–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, A. M., Hurtado, S., & Galdeano, E. C. (2015). Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Advancing research and transformative practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. E. (1993). A comparison of student revisions when composing with pen and paper versus word-processing. Computers in the Schools, 9, 55–69. doi:10.1300/j025v09n04_06
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. L., & Dodd, W. M. (1987). Talking into writing: Exercises for basic writers. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Schilperoord, J. (1996). It’s about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Severinson-Eklundh, K. (1992). Problems in achieving a global perspective of the text in computer-based writing. Instructional Science, 21, 73–84. doi:10.1007/bf00119656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 378–388. doi:10.2307/356588
   Google Scholar
• Stay, B. (1983). When rewriting succeeds: An analysis of student revisions. The Writing Center Journal, 4(1), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Thonus, T. (2002). Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials. What is “success”? Assessing Writing, 8, 110–134. doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00002-3
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 6(5), 568–580.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L., Siegel, M. J., & Davenport, Z. (2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 173–201. doi:10.1016/jslw.2004.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., & de Cani, J. S. (1984). Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1065–1075. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.76.6.1065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, S. P. (1987). Revising, composing theory, and research design. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 250–284). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar