After-School Programs for Bilingual Students: Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives and Students’ Achievement

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Teacher Education, 88(5), 785–810. doi:10.1002/sce.10143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, C. T., Snow, C. E., & Christian, D. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems.
   Google Scholar
• AIMSweb. (2014). Reading assessment resource for educators. Boston, MA: NCS Pearson, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. F. (1994). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(4), 304–307. doi:10.2307/747778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi, J., & Gambrell, L. (1997). Conflict during a classroom discussion can be a good thing. In J. Paratore & R. McCormack (Eds.), Peer talk in the classroom: Learning from research (pp. 130–155). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (1995, April). Talking is something we’re pretty deprived of at school: Middle school students speak out. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Childhood Education International. (2007). Elementary education standards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 141–170. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., & Willis, A. I. (2013). Conversation currents: On discourse and language learning. Language Arts, 91(1), 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, R., Quinn, S., & Morton, M. L. (2009). Consonance and dissonance in a study abroad program as a catalyst for professional development of preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 525–532. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. L. (2007). Supporting English language learners in content reading. Reading Improvement, 44(1), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (2005). The value of conversations for language development and reading comprehension. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Alberto, P. A., Compton, D. L., & O’Connor, R. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers. Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., & Harvey, S. (2009). Comprehension and collaboration: Inquiry circles in action. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dealy, A. E. (2015). “Language thins the line”: The cultural development of dual language graduates: A reciprocal relationship between language, culture and civic identity development. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3746325)
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Falk-Ross, F. C. (2002). Classroom-based language and literacy intervention: A programs and case studies approach. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Falk-Ross, F. C. (2007). Language factors in literacy achievement of young adolescents. In S. Mertens V. Anfara, & M. Caskey (Eds.), Handbook of research in middle level education: Vol. 6. The young adolescent and the middle school (pp. 73–89). Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Falk-Ross, F. C. (Ed.). (2014). Language-based approaches to support reading comprehension. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Falk-Ross, F. C., & Carrier, K. (2005). Transitions from Spanish to English: Supporting students’ language and literacy constructions in the classroom. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 33(4), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fecho, B., & Botzakis, S. (2007). Feasts of becoming: Imagining a literacy classroom based on dialogic beliefs. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(4), 548–558. doi:10.1598/jaal.50.7.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., Luke, A., & Gilbert, P. (1991). Reading positions and practices in the classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 21, 435–457. doi:10.1080/03626784.1991.11075380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, E. E., Jensen, B., & Cuellar, D. (2006). Early academic achievement of Hispanics in the United States: Implications for teacher preparation. New Educator, 2(2), 123–147. doi:10.1080/15476880600657215
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O., Johnson, S. I., & Seltzer, K. (2016). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging bilingualism for learning. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F., Reschly, D., & Shinn, M. R. (2010). RTI as a driving force in educational improvement: Historical legal, research, and practice perspectives. In M. R. Shinn & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems in a three-tier model, including RTI (pp. 47–77). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K. D. (1995). Unpackaging academic discourse. Discourse Processes, 19(1), 21–37. doi:10.1080/01638539109544903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. doi:10.1598/rrq.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. V., Mosley, M., Horan, D. A., Russell, K., Warren, H. K., & Roach, A. K. (2009). STELLAR tutoring in preservice teacher preparation: Exploring video case support for learning to teach. In J. Richards & C. Lassonde (Eds.), Literacy tutoring that works (pp. 7–20). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1982)
   Google Scholar
• Houge, T. T., Peyton, D., Geler, C., & Petrie, B. (2007). Adolescent literacy tutoring: Face-to-face and via webcam technology. Reading Psychology, 28(3), 283–300. doi:10.1080/02702710601186399
   Google Scholar
• Hynde, C. (1999). Instructional considerations in middle and secondary schools. In J. Guthrie & D. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 81–104). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., Apel, K., & Al Otaiba, S. (2013). The relation of linguistic awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling for first-grade students participating in response to intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(4), 337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsty, H., & Kennedy, H. (2011). Learning through conversation: Exploring and extending teacher and children’s involvement in classroom talk. School Psychology International, 32(4), 377–396. doi:10.1177/0143034311406813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantopoulos, S. (2009). Effects of teachers on minority and disadvantaged students’ achievement in the early grades. Elementary School Journal, 110, 92–113. doi:10.1086/598845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. (2012). Using the conceptual change model of learning as an analytic tool in researching teacher preparation for student diversity. Teachers College Record, 114(8), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Our children’s future: Changing the focus of literacy and literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 53(5), 424–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. T. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallette, M. H., & Mthethwa, P. M. (2012). Guest editorial: Web 2.0 and literacy: Enacting a vision, imagining the possibilities. Research in the Schools, 19(1), i–iv.
   Google Scholar
• Medcalf, N. A., Bessette, K., & Gibbs, D. (2009). Everybody wins: A school-higher education partnership for reading improvement. In J. Richards & C. Lassonde (Eds.), Literacy tutoring that works (pp. 96–107). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Melnick, S. L., & Zeichner, K. M. (1995). Teacher education for cultural diversity: Enhancing the capacity of teacher education institutions to address diversity issues. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED392751)
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 392–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, S, Pritchard, R., Huang, C., & Pella, S. (2013). Learning to integrate new technologies into teaching and learning through a design-based model of professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(2), 203–223.
   Google Scholar
• Paez, M. M., Bock, K. P., & Pizzo, L. (2011). Supporting the language and early literacy skills of English language learners: Effective practices and future directions. In S. B. Neumann & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 136–152). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for After School Education (PASE). (2017). Initiatives. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://pasesetter.org/initiatives
   Google Scholar
• Peck, S. M. (2009). Endless possibilities for learning and reflection: Lessons from two after-school urban literacy clinics. In J. Richards & C. Lassonde (Eds.), Literacy tutoring that works: A look at successful in-school, after-school, and summer programs. Newark, DE: International Literacy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, O. F. (1993). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL (3rd ed., pp. 119–131). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Perie, M., & Moran, R. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics (NCES 2005–464). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Powell, N. W., & Marshall, A. (2011). The relationship factor: Making or breaking successful transitions for youth at risk. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 20(2), 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, K. B. (2009). Professional development and the after-school literacy program: A partnership for overall academic achievement. In J. Richards & C. Lassonde (Eds.), Literacy tutoring that works (pp. 132–140). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ragonis, N., & Hazzan, O. (2009). A tutoring model for promoting the pedagogical-disciplinary skills of prospective teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/13611260802658553
   Google Scholar
• Richgels, D. J. (2004). Theory and research into practice: Paying attention to language. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 470–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1978). Reading. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, R. (1970). The language-experience approach to reading. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind Act. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J, Roberts, G, & Al-Otaiba, S. (2014). Academic regarding during instruction and reading outcomes for kindergarten students at-risk for reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 55–78. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9433-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. (2013). Educational psychology (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. P. (2011). Connecting multiliteracies and engagement of students from low socio-economic backgrounds: Using Bernstein’s pedagogic discourse as a bridge. Language and Education, 25(3), 203–220. doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.560945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, T. A., Solari, E. J., Landry, S. H., & Swank, P. R. (2013). Effects of a brief tiered language intervention for pre-kindergarteners at risk. Early Education & Development, 24(3), 366–392. doi:10.1080/10409289.2012.664763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar