Predictors of Reading Comprehension Among Struggling Readers Who Exhibit Differing Levels of Inattention and Hyperactivity

References

• ACT. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68–82. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi:10.1007/BF02294359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80(2), 606–621. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01282.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 325–346. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.902461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. A., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., & Francis, D. J. (2016). Cognitive difficulties in struggling comprehenders and their relation to reading comprehension: A comparison of group selection and regression-based models. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 153–172. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1111482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, A. E., Barnes, M., Francis, D. J., Vaughn, S., & York, M. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehends and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28, 587–609. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9540-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 541–552. doi:10.1177/0022219410371676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212. doi:10.1007/BF01246098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling, 20(4), 681–703. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 687–700. doi:10.1037/a0019452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03214546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuPaul, G. J., Gormley, M. J., & Laracy, S. D. (2013). Comorbidity of LD and ADHD: Implications of DSM-5 for assessment and treatment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 43–51. doi:10.1177/0022219412464351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 145–200. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S., D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 586–592. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A., Glutting, J. J., & Watkins, M. W. (2007). ADHD and achievement meta-analysis of the child, adolescent, and adult literatures and a concomitant study with college students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 49–65. doi:10.1177/00222194070400010401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. M., Rapport, M. D., Raiker, J. S., Orban, S. A., & Eckrich, S. J. (2017). Reading comprehension in boys with ADHD: The mediating roles of working memory and orthographic conversion. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 273–287. doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0171-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., Fustoe, M., & Woodcock, R. W. (1974). Auditory skills test battery. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., Snowling, M., & Clarke, P. (2013). Accessing, integrating, and inhibiting word meaning in poor comprehenders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 177–198. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.652721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, second edition (K-BIT-2). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778. doi:10.1037/a0015956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakes, K. D., Swanson, J. M., & Riggs, M. (2012). The reliability and validity of the English and Spanish Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD and Normal Behavior Rating Scales in a preschool sample continuum measures of hyperactivity and inattention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(6), 510–516. doi:10.1177/1087054711413550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. S., & Cheung, G. W. (2012). Estimating and comparing specific mediation effects in complex latent variable models. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 3–16. doi:10.1177/1094428110391673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loe, I. M., & Feldman, H. M. (2007). Academic and educational outcomes of children with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. (2007). Subtypes versus severity differences in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the northern Finnish birth cohort. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1584–1593. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31815750dd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, M., & Tannock, R. (2007). Working memory and inattentive behaviour in a community sample of children. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(12), 1–11. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-3-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141, 302–320. doi:10.1037/a0025250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervag, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291. doi:10.1037/a0028228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W., & Horn, J. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change: Decade of behavior (pp. 203–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., & Nylund, K. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Evaluation & Regional Assistance. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices (NCEE Publication No. 2008-4027). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502398.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palladino, P., & Ferrari, M. (2013). Interference control in working memory: Comparing groups of children with atypical development. Child Neuropsychology, 19, 37–54. doi:10.1080/09297049.2011.633505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 380–391. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., Rane, S., Fall, A.-M., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2014). The impact of intensive reading intervention on level of attention in middle school students. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44(6), 942–953. doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.913251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, J. M. (1995). SNAP-IV scale. Irvine: University of California Child Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Educational Agency. (2003). Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS). Austin, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co‐activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351. doi:10.1002/acp.1418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcutt, E. G., Nigg, J. T., Pennington, B. F., Solanto, M. V., Rohde, L. A., Tannock, R., … Lahey, B. B. (2012). Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 991–1010. doi:10.1037/a0027347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar