Effects of Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Intervention on Comprehension-Related Outcomes for Ninth Graders With Low Reading Comprehension

References

• Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., Capin, P., Cho, E., Stillman-Spisak, S., Martinez, L., & Kincaid, H. (2016). Effects of a text-processing comprehension intervention on struggling middle school readers. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), 368–389. doi:10.1097/TLD.0000000000000101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57(1), 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293. doi:10.1044/1092-4388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, L., Zumeta-Edmonds, R., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2016). Intensive intervention: What it is, who it’s for, and why it’s important [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://www.intensiveintervention.org/video-resource/intensive-intervention-what-it-who-its-and-why-its-important
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. doi:10.1037/a0024338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., Smith-Johnson, J., Dimino, J., & Peterson, A. (2006). Eyes on the prize: Teaching complex historical content to middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 264–280. doi:10.1177/001440290607200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Snow, C., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Common themes in teaching reading for understanding: Lessons from three projects. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(3), 255–264. doi:10.1002/jaal.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: How to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. Gaithersburg, MD: STATAXIS.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9295-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. L., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2011). The effects of strategic morphological analysis instruction on the vocabulary performance of secondary students with and without disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 17–34. doi:10.1177/073194871103400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, M. F., Brasseur, I. F., Deshler, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A., & Stribling, J. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling reader in urban schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(1), 21–38. doi:10.2307/25474660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2001). Any small goodness. New York, NY: Scholastic, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov//
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5, 1270–1328. doi:10.1598/0872075028.46
   Google Scholar
• Lang, L., Torgesen, J., Vogel, W., Chanter, C., Lefsky, E., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 149–175. doi:10.1080/19345740802641535
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 211–224. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L., & Hughes, K. E. (2007). GMRT manual for scoring and interpretation. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, R., Krohn, K. R., Skinner, C. H., Hilton-Prillhart, A., Hopkins, M., Waller, S., & Polite, F. (2011). Improving reading comprehension of at-risk high-school students: The ART of Reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 78–86. doi:10.1002/pits.20541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsy, L., Kieffer, M., & Snow, C. (2010). Measure for measure: A critical consumers’ guide to reading comprehension assessments for adolescents. Final Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York’s Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2015). The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2015: Summary data tables. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Oslund, E. L., Clemens, N. H., Simmons, D. C., Smith, S. L., & Simmons, L. E. (2016). How vocabulary knowledge of middle-school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds influences comprehension processes and outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 159–165. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, C. G. (2002). Teaching decoding skills to poor readers in high school. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(1), 99–118. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2013). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 336–365). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research based strategies all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–39.
   Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A Meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (2003). Assessment of reading comprehension: Researchers and practitioners helping themselves and each other. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 192–206). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Vaughn, S., & Scammacca, N. (2015). The effects of a reading comprehension and vocabulary intervention for secondary students demonstrating adequate word reading and low comprehension. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 30(3), 104–113. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12061
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129–140. doi:10.1207/sldrp1403_1
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Fall, A. M., Roberts, G., Hall, C., & Miller, V. L. (2016). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below-average readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(1), 37–53. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1072068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency (2004). Appendix 10—Technical digest 2004–2005. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index3.aspx?id=4397&menu_id=793
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education (2015). (Accessed from www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015//files/Tech_Appendix_Reading.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. D., …. Francis, D. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 244–256. doi:10.1177/0022219412442157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Linan-Thompson, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for seventh-grade English language learners: Findings from two experimental studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 297–324. doi:10.1080/19345740903167018
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman, ‐Spisak, S. J., … Simmons, D. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93. doi:10.1002/rrq.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2010). Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Metz, K., Murray, C., Roberts, G., & Danielson, L. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 163–195. doi:10.3102/0034654313477212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Denton, C. A. (2010). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 2–10. doi:10.1111/j.15405826.2009.00296.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Mather, N. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar