Curriculum-Based Readers Theatre as an Approach to Literacy and Content Area Instruction for English Language Learners

References

• Ariza, E., Morales-Jones, C., Yahya, N., & Zainuddin, H. (2010). Why TESOL? Theories and issues in teaching English as a second language for K-12 teachers (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• August, D., Carlo, M. Dressier, C, & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 50–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00120.x
   Google Scholar
• Batt, E. G. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of ELL education: Potential solutions to overcome the greatest challenges. Multicultural Education, 15(3), 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, K., & Thurston, L. P. (2010). English language learner academic engagement and instructional grouping configurations. American Secondary Education, 39(1), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. L. (2007). Supporting English language learners in content-reading. Reading Improvement, 44(1), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Calderon, M., Slavin, R., & Sanchez, M. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. Future of Children, 21(1), 103–127. doi: 10.1353/foc.2011.0007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dessler, C., Lippman, D. N., … White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrison, C., & Ernst-Slavit, G. (2005). From silence to a whisper to active participation: Using literature circles with ELL students. Reading Horizons, 46(2), 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & McDonnough, J. T. (2009). Meeting the needs of high school science teachers in English language learner instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 385–402. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9136-9
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (1976). An exact probability test for use with Likert-type scales. Educational Psychological Measurement, 36, 647–655. doi: 10.1177/001316447603600310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, C. A., & Davis, A. D. (2005). A study of the effects of readers’ theater on second and third grade special education students’ fluency growth. Reading Improvement, 42(2), 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C. J. (2017). Undergraduate biology students’ attitudes towards the use of Curriculum-Based Reader’s Theater in a laboratory setting. Bioscene, 43(1), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Richards-Tutor, C., Canges, R., & Francis, D. (2011). Using the SIOP Model to promote the acquisition of language and science concepts with English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 334–351. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2011.623600
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 195–210. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.4.195-211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2016). Making content comprehensible for English language learners: The SIOP model (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, R. (2004). Curriculum-based readers theatre: Setting the stage for reading and retention. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 360–365. doi: 10.1598/RT.58.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, R. (2007). Dramatizing the content with curriculum-based readers theatre, grades 6-12. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, T. D., & O’Connor, D. (2010). Readers’ theater: “Hold, on, let’s read it again.” TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(1), 6–13. doi: 10.1177/004005991004300101
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C., & Coleman, R. (2010). Promoting academic achievement among English learners: A guide to the research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. D., & Flynn, K. (2008). Asking the right questions. Journal of Staff Development, 29(1), 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. D., & Miller, K. B. (2013). Classroom instruction that works with English language Learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, C., & Evans, L. S. (2006). Mainstream teachers’ understanding of strategies for accommodating the needs of English language learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2), 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Keehn, S., Harmon, J., & Shoho, A. (2008). A study of readers theater in eighth grade: Issues of fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 24, 335–362. doi: 10.1080/10573560802004290
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, E. B. (2014). A place for readers theater. Teacher Librarian, 42(1), 59.
   Google Scholar
• Kinniburgh, L., & Shaw, E. (2007). Building reading fluency in elementary science through readers’ theatre. Science Activities, 44(1), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. D. (1979, June). Two recent statistical developments that aid in the analysis of instructor evaluation instruments. Paper presented at the Florida Statewide Conference of Institutional Research, Fort Meyers, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, W. D., Rupley, W. H., & Rasinski, T. (2009). Fluency in learning to reading for meaning: Going beyond repeated readings. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J. (2011). The system is broken and it’s failing these kids: High school social studies teachers’ attitudes towards training for ELLs. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 35(1), 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. (2004). “Like everybody else”: Equalizing educational opportunity for English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 43–66. doi: 10.2307/3588258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RMC Research (2011). Case study report: Promising arts integration practices for elementary school literacy instruction (Project STAGE Professional Development for Arts Educators Project). Tampa, FL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sudweeks, R. R., Glissmeyer, C. B., Morrison, T. G., Wilcox, B. R., & Tanner, M. W. (2004). Establishing reliable procedures for rating ELL students’ reading comprehension using oral retellings. Reading Research and Instruction, 43(3), 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Szpara, M. Y., & Ahmad, I. (2007). Supporting English-language learners in social studies class: Results from a study of high school teachers. The Social Studies, 98(5), 189–196. doi: 10.3200/TSSS.98.5.189-196
   Google Scholar
• Worthy, J., & Prater, K. (2002). “I thought about it all night”: Readers theatre for reading fluency and motivation. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 294–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C., & Rasinski, T. (2009). Implementing readers theatre as an approach to classroom fluency instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1598/RT.63.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar