Does a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students’ Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings From an Intervention Study

References

• Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
   Google Scholar
• Bamforth, R. (1993). Process versus genre: Anatomy of a false dichotomy. Prospect, 8 (2), 89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, H. (2006). What kind of resource is language and why does it matter for advanced language learning? In H. Byrnes. (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 1–28). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (Eds.) (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam, NLD: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing: Report of the Disadvantaged Schools Program Literacy Project. Sydney, Australia: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing. Assessing Writing. 40, 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment and curriculum reform in China: The College English Test and tertiary English as a foreign language education. Proceedings of 2008 AARE International Education Conference. Brisbane City: The Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Su, S. (2012). A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal, 66(2), 184–192. doi:10.1093/elt/ccr061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2012). Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291–304. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The power of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 1–21). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ generic competence: A genre-based and process-genre approach. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Sydney, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performances: John Swales’ genre analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 44–51. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. (1987). The question of genres. In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 9–21). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Feak, C., & Swales, J. (2011). Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres. Ann Abor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. doi:10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. (1993). An educational, or process, approach to the teaching of professional genres. ELT Journal, 47(4), 305–315.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives, (pp. 91–104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A. (1994). Do as I say’: The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In A. Freedman, & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 191–210). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Introductions: New views of genre and their implications for education. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 1–22). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). Whole language and process writing: Does one approach fit all? In J. Lloyd, E. Kameenui, & D. Chard. (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 239–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, W., & Liu, J. (2005). Test analysis of college students communicative competence in English. Asian EFL Journal, 7, 118–133.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modelling and remodelling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. doi:10.1177/0741088312451260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (1998). An evaluation of a genre-based approach to the teaching of EAP/ESP writing. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 147–156. doi:10.2307/3587913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L. (2011). Revisiting joint construction in the tertiary context. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 98–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research and pedagogy. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2014). Academic Written English. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and Researching Writing (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland, & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 206–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722. doi:10.2307/3587930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ka-Kan-Dee, M., & Kaur, S. (2015). Teaching strategies used by Thai EFL lectures to teaching argumentative writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 143–156. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.191
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Goh, H., Chan, J., & Yang, Y. (2009). Effective college writing: A process-genre approach (2nd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).
   Google Scholar
• Lefkowitz, N. (2009, November). The Future of Foreign Language Writing. Paper Presented at the Symposium of Second Language Writing, Tempe, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on L2 writing in English. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). Something to shoot for’: A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 21–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M., Martin, J. R., Kress, G., Kalantzis, M., Rothery, J., & Cope, W. (1989). An approach to writing K-12. Vol. 1–4. Sydney, Australia: Literacy and Education Research Network and Directorate of Studies, NSW Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Language studies: Children writing reader (pp. 21–30). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memari Hanjani, A., & Li, L. (2014). EFL learners’ written reflections on their experience of attending a process genre-based, student-centred essay writing course. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. T., Mitchell, T. D., & Pessoa, S. (2014). Valued voices: Students’ use of engagement in argumentative history writing. Linguistics and Education, 28, 107–120. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. T., Mitchell, T. D., & Pessoa, S. (2016). Impact of source texts and prompts on students’ genre uptake. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 11–24. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munice, J. (2002). Finding a place for grammar in EFL composition classes. EFL Journal, 56(2), 180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12–31. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin, S., & Mohammad, N. (2006). The best of two approaches: Process/genre-based approach to teaching writing. The English Teacher, 30, 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), Handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 347–366). Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pessoa, S., Mitchell, T., & Miller, R. (2017). Emergent arguments: A functional approach to analyzing student challenges with the argument genre. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 42–55. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa, S., Mitchell, T., & Miller, R. (2018). Scaffolding the argument genre in a multilingual university history classroom: Tracking the writing development of novice and experienced writers. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 81–96. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racelis, J. V., & Matsuda, P. K. (2013). Integrating process and genre into the second language writing classroom: Research into practice. Language Teaching, 46(3), 382–393. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 407–430. doi:10.2307/3586978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London, England: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J. (1994). Exploring literacy ill school English (Write it right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney, Australia: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1995). Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney, Australia: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2006). The linguistic features of advanced language use: The grammar of exposition. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 134–146). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions: Language studies unit. Birmingham, UK: University of Aston.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 79–101. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, S. L., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the Writing Strategies for Motivational Regulation Questionnaire (WSMRQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 123–134. doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0243-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tribble, C. (2015). Writing academic English further along the road. What is happening now in EAP writing instruction? ELT Journal, 69(4), 442–462. doi:10.1093/elt/ccv044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. X. (2014). Reform in the teaching of college English writing in the big data era. Modern Distance Education Research, 3, 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Q. (2018). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51(4), 526–540. doi:10.1017/S026144481600001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wette, R. (2017). Using mind maps to reveal and develop genre knowledge in a graduate writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2012). Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. (2019). Understanding students’ mimicry, emulation and imitation of genre exemplars: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2019.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111–133. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda, S. (2015). Exploring changes in FL writers’ meaning-making choices in summary writing: A systemic functional approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 105–121. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yayli, D. (2011). From genre awareness to cross-genre awareness: A study in an EFL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 121–129. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. (2018). The development of ESL writing quality and lexical proficiency: Suggestions for assessing writing achievement. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 387–319. doi:10.1080/15434303.2018.1536756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, X. (2004). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97–110. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195–209. doi:10.2307/3586792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165–187. doi:10.2307/3586647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36(2), 89–116. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2016). Reflections on the pedagogical imports of western practices for professionalizing ESL/EFL writing and writing-teacher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 203–232. doi:10.1075/aral.39.3.01zha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., Aryadoust, V., & Zhang, D. (2016). Taking stock of the effects of strategies-based instruction on writing in Chinese and English in Singapore primary schools. In R. E. Silver, & W. Bokhorst-Heng (Eds.), Quadrilingual education in Singapore: Pedagogical innovation in language education (pp. 103–126). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., & Qin, T. L. (2018). Validating a questionnaire on EFL writers’ metacognitive awareness of writing strategies in multimedia environments. In Haukås A, Bjørke C, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.),. Metacognition in language learning and teaching (pp. 157–179). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3–17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). Test review: College English test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408–417.
   Google Scholar