Effects of a Mathematical Writing Intervention on Middle School Students’ Performance

References

• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375–404. doi:10.3102/00346543058004375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2005). Writing in mathematics: An alternative form of communication for academically low-achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(2), 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00127.x
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, R. J., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/027027100278310
   Google Scholar
• Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., Cahill, J., Cardetti, F., Choppin, J. M., Cohen, J., & Zawodniak, R. (2016). Types of and purposes for elementary mathematical writing: Task force recommendations. Retrieved from http://mathwriting.eduation.uconn.edu
   Google Scholar
• Case, L. P., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, J., & Reid, R. (1996). Use of a self-regulated strategy intervention to improve word problem-solving skills of students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. A., Casa, T. M., Miller, H. C., & Firmender, J. M. (2015). Characteristics of second grader’s mathematical writing. School Science and Mathematics, 115(7), 344–355. doi:10.1111/ssm.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca-Carlino, Y., Freeman-Green, S., Stephenson, G. W., & Hauth, C. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for teaching multi-step equations to middle school students struggling in math. The Journal of Special Education, 50(2), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. H., Rooze, G. E., & Runnels, M. K. T. (1992). Writing-to-learn in elementary social studies. Social Education, 56, 393–397. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ463244
   Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Strategy instruction in planning: Effects on the writing performance and behavior of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 167–181. doi:10.1177/001440299706300202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deatline-Buchman, A., & Jitendra, A. K. (2006). Enhancing argumentative essay writing of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(1), 39–54. doi:10.2307/30035531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, B., Higgins, K. N., & Horney, M. (2016). How students communicate mathematical ideas: An examination of multimodal writing using digital technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 281–313. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1117603
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Finelli, R., Courey, S. J., & Hamlett, C. L. (2004). Expanding schema-based transfer instruction to help third graders solve real-life mathematical problems. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 419–445. doi:10.3102/00028312041002419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1978). Writing and critical thinking in the social studies. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(4), 291–310. doi:10.1080/03626784.1978.11075578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B., & Porat, D. (2011). “Could they do it differently?” Narrative and argumentative changes in students’ writing following discussion of “hot” historical issues. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 185–217. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.556832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunel, M., Omar, S., Grimberg, I., & Hand, B. (2002). Quantitative results from using the Science Writing Heuristic as a tool for learning in 7th grade biology class. Paper presented at the International Conference on Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistic, and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Aitken, A., Barkel, A., Houston, J., & Ray, A. (2017). Teaching spelling, writing, and reading for writing: Powerful evidence-based practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 262–272.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Roehling, J. V. (2018). Writing informational text using provided information and text structures: An intervention for upper elementary struggling writers. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2165–2190. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9841-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, M. A., & Powell, S. R. (2016). Examining fourth-grade mathematics writing: Features of organization, mathematics vocabulary and mathematical representations. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1511–1537. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9649-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods or meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. M., Lee, J-Y., Cook, M. J., & Riccomini, P. J. (2019). Exploratory study of a self-regulation mathematical writing strategy. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 17(2), 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. M., Powell, S. R., & Lee, J. (in press). Development and psychometric report of a middle-school mathematics vocabulary measure. Assessment for Effective Intervention. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1534508418820116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. M., Powell, S. R., & Stevens, E. A. (2016). Supporting clear and concise mathematics language: Say this, not that. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(1), 7–17. doi:10.1177/0040059916654901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. (2010). A framework for content area writing: Mediators and moderators. Journal of Writing Research, 2(1), 1–46. doi:10.17239/jowr-2010.02.01.1
   Google Scholar
• Klein, P. D., & Rose, M. A. (2010). Teaching argument and explanation to prepare junior students for writing to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 433–461. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 16–26. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L. (2015). Writing as a tool to demonstrate mathematical understanding. School Science and Mathematics, 115(6), 302–313. doi:10.1111/ssm.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. S., Polly, D., & Kissel, B. (2017). Exploring the impact of written reflections on learning in the elementary mathematics classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 538–553. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1149793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Davison, M. D., Hammer, C. S., Miller, C. A., & Glutting, J. (2013). Knowledge, writing, and language outcomes for a reading comprehension and writing instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1133–1158. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9409-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Snyder, K. H., Sukhram, D. P., & Kedem, Y. (2006). TWA+PLANS strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 69–89.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, E. E., & Panchyshyn, R. (1995). Vocabulary considerations for teaching mathematics. Childhood Education, 72(2), 80–83. doi:10.1080/00094056.1996.10521849
   Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C., & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing asks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 273–299. doi:10.1177/1086296X12450445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, A. S., Swanson, H. L., Gerber, M. M., & Fung, W. (2014). The effects of paraphrasing interventions on problem-solving accuracy for children at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 97–105. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP) (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2015). The Pennsylvania System of School Assessment: Mathematics item and scoring sampler (2015–2016, Grade 5). Retrieved from https://www.education.pa.gov/K-12/Assessment%20and%20Accountability/PSSA/Pages/Mathematics.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Driver, M. K. (2015). The influence of mathematics vocabulary instruction embedded within addition tutoring for first-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(4), 221–233. doi:10.1177/0731948714564574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Hebert, M. A. (2016). Influence of writing ability and computational skill on mathematics writing. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 310–335. doi:10.1086/688887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Hebert, M. A., Cohen, J. A., Casa, T. M., & Firmender, J. M. (2017). A synthesis of mathematics writing: Assessment, interventions, and surveys. Journal of Writing Research, 8(3), 493–526. doi:10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, G. A., & Perin, D. (2009). A comparison of text structure and self-regulated writing strategies for composing from sources by middle school students. Reading Psychology, 30(3), 265–300. doi:10.1080/02702710802411547
   Google Scholar
• Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. W., Hughes, E. M., & Fries, K. M. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31, 235–252. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogevich, M. E., & Perin, D. (2008). Effects on science summarization of a reading comprehension intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders. Exceptional Children, 74(2), 135–154. doi:10.1177/001440290807400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, P., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643–470. doi:10.1002/sce.21069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV test of achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Schrank, F. A., & Wendling, B. J. (2018). The Woodcock-Johnson IV: Tests of cognitive abilities, tests of oral language, tests of achievement. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 383–451). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shield, M., & Galbraith, P. (1998). The analysis of student expository writing in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(1), 29–52. doi:10.1023/A:100310981
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 134–146. doi:10.2307/747358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2013). The common core state standards and evidence-based educational practices: The case of writing. School Psychology Review, 42(3), 343–357. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED566949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar