The Effect of Computer-Assisted Conceptual Model-Based Intervention Program on Mathematics Problem-Solving Performance of At-Risk English Learners^*

References

• Blomhøj, M. (2004). Mathematical modelling – a theory for practice. In B. Clarke., et al. (Eds.), International perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 145–159). Göteborg: National Center for Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boulineau, T., Fore, C, Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M. D. (2004). Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 105–121. doi:10.2307/1593645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., & Reinking, D. (2011). A formative experiment to enhance teacher-child language interactions in a preschool classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(3), 362–401. doi:10.1177/1468798411410802
   Google Scholar
• Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1(3), 245–296. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0103_1
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, W. G., Pothier, Y. M., Vance, J. H., & Bezuk, N. S. (2006). Learning mathematics in elementary and middle schools: A learner-centered approach (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Merkel, G. (1989). Thinking strategies as an example of teaching arithmetic through problem solving. In P. Trafton (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics: 1989 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 70–81). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Wheatley, G. (1988). Children's initial understandings of ten. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(3), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012). Common core state standards for mathematics practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org.
   Google Scholar
• Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araujo, Z., Roberts, S. A., Willey, C., & Zahner, W. (2018). English learners in K–12 mathematics education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 8(6), 879–919. doi:10.3102/0034654318798093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1153. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. K., & Powell, S. R. (2017). Culturally and linguistically responsive schema intervention: Improving word problem solving for english language learners with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 41–53. doi:10.1177/0731948716646730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Culatta, B. E., & Horn, D. G. (1987). Influence of irrelevant information in addition word problems on problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(1), 29–36. doi:10.2307/1510752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESL workshop. (2019). Scaffolding theory – a guide to learning English. Retrieved from esl.fis.edu/teachers/fis/scaffold/page1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., Cutting, L. E., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2019). Connections between reading comprehension and word-problem solving via oral language comprehension: Implications for comorbid learning disabilities. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(165), 73–90. doi:10.1002/cad.20288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerena, L., & Keiler, L. (2012). Effective intervention with urban secondary English language learners: How peer instructors support learning. Bilingual Research Journal, 35(1), 76–97. doi:10.1080/15235882.2012.667372
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2014). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, M. (2016). Assessing English language learners: Bridges to educational equity: Connecting academic language proficiency to student achievement, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine, D. (1990). Story grammar. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(6), 335–342. doi:10.1177/002221949002300603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 189–196. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2016). Assessing a multi-component math intervention within a cognitive-behavioral framework on the word problem-solving responses of a diverse group of third graders. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–26. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1160638.
   Google Scholar
• Klerlein, J., & Hervey, S. (2019). Mathematics as a complex problem-solving activity: Promoting students’ thinking through problem-solving. Generation Ready. Retrieved from https://www.generationready.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Mathematics-as-a-Complex-Problem-Solving-Activity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulm, G. (1979). The classification of problem solving. Columbus, OH: Education Resources Information Center.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. C., Parker, R. M., & Trenholme, B. (1978). The effects of syntactic complexity upon arithmetic performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1(4), 80–85. doi:10.2307/1510980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. B., & Cherney, L. R. (2018). Tau-U: A quantitative approach for analysis of single-case experimental data in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1S), 495–503. doi:10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, Q., Mason, R., Xin, Y. P., Davis, J., & David, M. V. (2019). Meta-analysis of single-case research on mathematics word problem-solving instructions for scaffolding English learners at-risk for learning disabilities. Paper presented at 2019 Indiana STEM Education Conference, WL, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Q., Xin, Y. P., Morita-Mullaney, T., & Tzur, R. (in press). Instructional scaffolds in mathematics instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: An exploratory case study. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., Doerr, H. M., Carmona, G., & Hjalmarson, M. (2003). Beyond constructivism. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 211–233. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0502&3_05
   Google Scholar
• Lester, F. K. Jr. (1983). Trends and issues in mathematical problem solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 229–261). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 363–371. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maletsky, E. M., Andrews, A. G., Burton, G. M., Johnson, H. C., & Luckie, L. A. (2004). Harcourt math (Indiana ed.). Chicago, IL: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2008). Mathematical modeling and meta-cognitive instruction. Retrieved from http://www.icme-organisers.dk/tsg18/S32MevarechKramarski.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Scaffolding student participation in mathematical practices. ZDM, 47(7), 1067–1078. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0730-3
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress Result (NAEP). (2017). NAEP Report Card: Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/math_2017?grade=4.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress result (NAEP). (2019). NAEP report card: Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics/?grade=4
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics electronic version. http://standards.nctm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Orosco, M. (2014). Word problem strategy for Latino English language learners at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(1), 45–53. doi:10.1177/0731948713504206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. Y., Xin, Y. P., Tzur, R., Si, L., Liu, J., Hord, C., Cordova, M., & Ruan, L. Y. (2013). Exploring the effects of intelligent tutoring system on multiplicative reasoning and problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the 2013 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson Inc. (2004). Stanford Achievement Test, Tenth Edition (SAT-10). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Rand, R. H. (1984). Computer algebra in applied mathematics: An introduction to MACSYMA. Boston: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M. (1993). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). New York: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1992). Schemes of action and operation involving composite units. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(3), 259–309. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(92)90005-y
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children's counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application. New York: Praeger Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/essa?src=rn
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, J. A. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved from singlecaseresearch.org.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Cognitive and linguistic predictors of mathematical word problems with and without irrelevant information. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcutt, E., G., Petrill, S. A., Wu, S., Boada, R., Defries, J. C., Olson, R. K., & Pennington, B. F. (2013). Comorbidity between reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(6), 500–516. doi:10.1177/0022219413477476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word-problem-solving tasks presented in textbooks and their relation to student performance: A cross-curriculum comparison case study. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 347–359. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.6.347-360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P. (2012). Conceptual model-based problem solving: Teach students with learning difficulties to solve math problems. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P. (2015). Research related to modeling and problem solving: Conceptual model-based problem solving: emphasizing prealgebraic conceptualization of mathematical relations. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Ed.) More lessons learned from research: useful and useable research related to core mathematical practices (pp. 235–246). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., Kastberg, S., & Chen, Y. (2015). Conceptual model-based problem solving (COMPS): A response to intervention program for students with LDM. National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., Wiles, B., & Lin, Y. (2008). Teaching conceptual model-based word-problem story grammar to enhance mathematics problem solving. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 163–178. doi:10.1177/0022466907312895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., Zhang, D., Park, J. Y., Tom, K., Whipple, A., & Si, L. (2011). A comparison of two mathematics problem-solving strategies: Facilitate algebra-readiness. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 381–395. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.487080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., Liu, J., & Zheng, X. (2011). A cross-cultural lesson comparison on teaching the connection between multiplication and division. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 354–367. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00098.x
   Google Scholar
• Zentall, S. S. (2014). Students with mild exceptionalities: Characteristics and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781506374604
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., Flynn, L. J., & Swanson, H. L. (2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem solving and math disabilities: A selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 97–111. doi:10.1177/0731948712444277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar