Examining Writing Measures and Achievement for Students of Varied Language Abilities and Linguistic Backgrounds Using Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Berninger, V. W., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Booth Olson, C., Matuchniak, T., Chung, H.Q., Stumpf, R., & Farkas, G. (2017). Reducing achievement gaps in academic writing for Latinos and English Learners in Grades 7–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/edu0000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F. (1996). An exploratory study of morphological errors in children’s written stories. Reading and Writing, 8(1), 61–72. doi:10.1007/BF00423925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danzak, R. L. (2011). The integration of lexical, syntactic, and discourse features in bilingual adolescents’ writing: An exploratory approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(4), 491–505. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 368–371. doi:10.1177/001440298204800417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J. E., Connelly, V., Walter, K., & Critten, S. (2015) Assessing children’s writing products: the role of curriculum based measures. British Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 575–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., Connelly, V., & Mackie, C. (2007). Constraints in the production of written text in children with specific language impairment. Exceptional Children, 73(2), 147–164. doi:10.1177/001440290707300202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2008). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Education Northwest. (2006). 6 + 1 trait® writing. Retrieved from https://educationnorthwest.org/traits.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Petscher, Y., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Florida assessments for instruction in reading aligned to the language arts Florida standards (FAIR-FS): Grades 3 through 12 administration manual and technical manual. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4058). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. doi:10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–486. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 123–145. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9
   Google Scholar
• Green, L., McCutchen, D., Schwiebert, C., Quinlan, T., Eva-Wood, A., & Juelis, J. (2003). Morphological development in children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 752–761. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2002). Topic continuity in L2 English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 387–418. doi:10.1017/S0272263102003029.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50. Doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. (2016). Writing process products in intermediate-grade children with and without language-based learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(6), 1471–1483. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2012). Comparison of narrative and expository writing in students with and without language-learning disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(4), 395–409. doi:10.1044/01611461(2012/11-0018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2013). A structural equation model of the writing process in typically-developing sixth grade children. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 941–966. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9399-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Kelley, J. G., & Russ Harris, J. (2014). Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents: Evidence from a randomized field trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1159–1194. doi:10.3102/0002831214532165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Koda, K., Siegel, L. S., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Development of literacy of language minority learners. In D. L. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in a second language: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 75–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mabry, L. (1999). Writing to the rubric: Lingering effects of traditional standardized testing on direct writing assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 80(9), 673–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, C., & Dockrell, J. E. (2004). The nature of written language deficits in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1469–1483. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/109)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Hapshire, NY: Palgrave Macmillon.
   Google Scholar
• Matuchniak, T., Olson, C. B., & Scarcella, R. (2014). Examining the text-based, on-demand, analytical writing of mainstreamed Latino English learners in a randomized field trial of the Pathway Project intervention. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 973–994. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9490-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, T. U., & Gillam, R. B. (1996). An examination of the quality of narratives produced by children with language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27(1), 48–56. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2701.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B., & McCardle, P. (2011). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 121–132. doi:10.1007/s11145010-9267-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F., Andriacchi, K., & Nockerts, A. (2015). Assessing language production using SALT software: A clinician’s guide to language sample analysis. Middleton, WI: SALT Software LLC.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/neglectedr.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Nippold, M. A., & Sun, L. (2008). Knowledge of morphologically complex words: A developmental study of older children and young adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(3), 365–373. doi:10.1044/01611461(2008/034).
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86. doi:10.1075/swll.11.14per.
   Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., Lombardino, L. J., & Altman, L. J. P. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 107–120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, J. (1996). The manual of the Weschler objective language dimensions (WOLD): UK edition. London, UK: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(2), 324–339. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4302.324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, D., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. D., Coker, D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J., Piantedosi, K. W., & Hartranft, A. M. (2015). The relationship between language skills and writing outcomes for linguistically diverse students in upper elementary school. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 103–125. doi:10.1086/683135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L. G., Tschinkel, E., & Kantor, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 203–220. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIATT-II). London, UK: Pearson; Harcourt Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. J., Larkin, R. F., & Blaggan, S. (2013). Written language skills in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(2), 160–171. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Bustamante, K., Schatschneider, C., & Hart, S. (2019). Relationship between children’s lexical diversity on written narratives and performance on a standardized reading vocabulary measure. Assessment for Effective Interventions, 44(3), 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, C. Schatschneider, C., & Hart, S. (2019). Average One Year Change in Lexical Measures of Written Narratives for School Age Students. Reading Writing Quarterly, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–259. doi:10.1093/applin/amp024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar