Universal Screening for Writing Risk in Spanish-Speaking First Graders

References

• Agencia Canaria de Calidad Universitaria y Evaluación Educativa. (2018). Evaluación de diagnóstico en tercero y en sexto de educación primaria (Curso 2017/2018). Informe Ejecutivo [Third and sixth grade elementary school diagnostic evaluation (2017/2018). Executive report]. Retrieved from http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/accuee/nouniversitaria/evadia/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, C. R., & Christ, T. J. (2012). Supporting valid decision making: Uses and misuses of assessment data within the context of RtI. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 231–244. doi:10.1002/pits.21592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrientos, P. (2017). Handwriting development in Spanish children with and without learning disabilities: A graphonomic approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 552–563. doi:10.1177/0022219416633866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., … Apel, K. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 61–92. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., & Winn, W.D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Augsburger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3), 123–141. doi:10.2307/27740364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boletín Oficial del Estado. (2013). Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa [Organic Law 8/2013, of December 9, for the improvement of educational quality]. Pub. L. No. 295, 12886 et seq. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2013/BOE-A-2013-12886-consolidado.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Jacob, S., & Wagner, A. R. (2008). Ethical and legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 263–279. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Espin, C. A., & McMaster, K. (2013). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based writing measures with English learners. Reading and Writing, 26(3), 431–452. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9375-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 163–176. doi:10.1177/0022219408326219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2010). Curriculum-based measurement of writing in kindergarten and first grade: An investigation of production and qualitative scores. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 175–193. doi:10.1177/001440291007600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, D. L., & Ritchey, K. D. (2014). Universal screening for writing risk in kindergarten. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(4), 245–256. doi:10.1177/1534508413502389.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Gilbert, J. K., Barquero, L. A., … Crouch, R. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 327–340. doi:10.1037/a0018448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defior, S., & Serrano, F. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 81–98. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1.
   Google Scholar
• Defior, S., Jiménez-Fernández, G., & Serrano, F. (2009). Complexity and lexicality effects on the acquisition of Spanish spelling. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 368–371. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1982-08581-001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 140–153. doi:10.1177/002246690003400303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics a review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 121–139. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Slider, N. J., Hoffpauir, L. D., Whitmarsh, E. L., & Naquin, G. M. (2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 291–300. doi:10.1002/pits.10166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansle, K., Noell, G., VanDerHeyden, A., Naquin, G., & Slider, N. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477–497. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ667622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansle, K., VanDerHeyden, A., Noell, G., Resetar, J., & Williams, K. (2006). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students. School Psychology Review, 35, 435–450. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ788267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Early screening for risk of reading disabilities: Recommendations for a four-step screening system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(1), 6–14. doi:10.1177/1534508412451491.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. A., & Albers, C. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 117–135. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 19–52. 10.1017/S0142716400010560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 7–87. doi:10.1007/BF01761831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 620–633. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Struck, M., Santoro, J., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: Motor programs, visual-spatial arrangement, and letter formation parameter setting. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 43–60. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán, R., & Jiménez, J. E. (2001). Estudio normativo sobre parámetros psicolingüísticos en niños de 6 a 8 años: La familiaridad sujetiva. [Normative study on psycholinguistic parameters in children from 6 to 8 years old: Subjective familiarity]. Cognitiva, 2, 153–191. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-05636-002.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, D. D., & Lembke, E. S. (2016). Examining the technical adequacy of progress monitoring using early writing curriculum-based measures. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 32, 336–352. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.973984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148(3), 839–843. doi:10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Jr, Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 115–162. doi:10.1080/02643290242000871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Douglas, D. D. (2009). Universal screening within a response-to-intervention model. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M. J., Neessen, E., & Witt, J. C. (2008). Best practices in universal screening. Best Practices in School Psychology, 5, 103–114. Retrieved from http://www.joewitt.org/Downloads/IkedaBPV60.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ788363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, J., & Malecki, C. K. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34, 27. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-03651-004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E. (2017a). Early grade writing assessment: An instrument model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50 (5), 491–503. doi:10.1177/0022219416633127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E. (2017b). Implementation of response to intervention model in the Canary islands. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 43(4), 47–50. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/9a1bfa7a34d42fc7380e4a049d3073b9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=28091.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E. (2019). Early grade writing assessment: A report on development of an instrument. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000266277.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E., & Gil, V. (2019). IPAE: Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Escritura [Indicators of Basic Early Writing Skills] [Supplemental material]. In J. E. Jiménez (Ed.), Modelo de Respuesta a la Intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje [Response to Intervention model: A preventive approach for learning disabilities]. Pirámide.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E., & Hernández-Cabrera, J. A. (2019). Transcription skills and written composition in Spanish beginning writers: Pen and keyboard modes. Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1847–1879. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9928-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Mellard, D. F., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M. A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. [RTI Manual]. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C., Griffith, P., & Gough, P. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243–255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., & Perret, C. (2015). How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition? Cognition, 136, 325–336. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2005). The effect of orthographic regularity on children’s handwriting production. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain and Cognition, 17, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lembke, E., Deno, S. L., & Hall, K. (2003). Identifying and indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 23–35. doi:10.1177/073724770302800304.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D., Lowry, L., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. (1981). An analysis of learning trends in simple measures of reading, spelling, and written expression: A longitudinal study (Research Report no. 49). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED211602.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., & Campbell, H. (2008). Technical features of new and existing measures of written expression: An examination within and across grade levels. School Psychology Review, 37, 550–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Du, X., & Pétursdóttir, A. L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 41–60. doi:10.1177/0022219408326212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Du, X., Yeo, S., Deno, S. L., Parker, D., & Ellis, T. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 185–206. doi:10.1177/001440291107700203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 68–84. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Capasso, R. (2006). Spelling and dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 110–134. doi:10.1080/02643290500202730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación (2010). Evaluación general de diagnóstico 2009. Educación Primaria. Cuarto curso. Informe de Resultados [General diagnostic evaluation 2009. Elementary School. Fourth grade. Results report]. Retrieved from https://www.mecd.gob.es/dctm/ievaluacion/evaluaciongeneraldiagnostico/pdf-completo-informe-egd-2009.pdf?documentId=0901e72b8015e34e.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., McMaster, K. L., & Burns, M. K. (2011). Determining an instructional level for early writing skills. School Psychology Review, 40, 158. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ921471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchey, K. D. (2006). Learning to write: Progress monitoring tools for beginning and at-risk writers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(2), 22–26. doi:10.1177/004005990603900204.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, K. D., & Coker, D. L. (2014). Identifying writing difficulties in first grade: An investigation of writing and reading measures. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29, 54–65. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchey, K. D., Coker, D. L., & McCraw, S. B. (2010). A comparison of metrics for scoring beginning spelling. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(2), 78–88. doi:10.1177/1534508409336087.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, C., & Villarroel, R. (2017). Predicting handwriting difficulties through spelling processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 504–510. doi:10.1177/0022219416633863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romig, J. E., Therrien, W. J., & Lloyd, J. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of criterion validity for curriculum-based measurement in written language. The Journal of Special Education, 51(2), 72–82. doi:10.1177/0022466916670637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, N. (2013). Early development of text writing in two contrasting orthographies: English and Spanish (Doctoral dissertation). Bangor, Wales: Bangor University. Retrieved from http://e.bangor.ac.uk/4942/.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, V., Diuk, B., Borzone, A.M., &., & Ferroni, M. (2009). El desarrollo de la escritura de palabras en español: Interacción entre el conocimiento fonológico y ortográfico [The development of the writing of words in Spanish: Interaction between phonological and orthographic knowledge]. Interdisciplinaria, 26, 95–119. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=18011862005.
   Google Scholar
• Schatschneider, C., Petscher, Y., & Williams, K. M. (2008). How to evaluate a screening process: The vocabulary of screening and what educators need to know. In L. M. Justice & C. Vukelich (Eds.), Achieving excellence in preschool literacy instruction (pp. 304–316). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M., oration with COST Action A8 network (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M., & Marston, D. (1985). Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A Curriculum-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 6(2), 31–45. doi:10.1177/074193258500600207.
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1989). Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs. The Journal of Special Education, 23(2), 169–183. doi:10.1177/002246698902300204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10(2–3), 165–191. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videen, J., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Vol. IRLD-RR-84). Minneapolis, MN: Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED225112.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wydell, T. N., & Butterworth, B. (1999). A case study of an English-Japanese bilingual with monolingual dyslexia. Cognition, 70(3), 273–305. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00016-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar