The Power of Context: Exploring Teachers’ Formative Assessment for Online Collaborative Writing

References

• Alotaibi, K. A. (2019). Teachers’ Perceptions on Factors Influence Adoption of Formative Assessment. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), 74-86.
   Google Scholar
• Au, K. H. (1998). Social constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969809548000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. W. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, M., & Bartz, D. E. (2017). Effective Use of Formative Assessment by High School Teachers. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(8), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s Conception of Language. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• (2008). Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D.J. (Eds.). Handbook of research on new literacies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crookes, G. (1997). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach. ? The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2014). A research synthesis on effective writing instruction in primary education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1219
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, N. (2018). Global K‐12 mobile PC market projected to pick up in 2018, as large national projects compensate the slowdown in the USA [Press release]. https://www.futuresource-consulting.com/press-release/education-technology-press/global-k-12-mobile-pc-market-projected-to-pick-up-in-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2013). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers (FAST) Collaborative. (2018). Retrieved June 11, 2019, from https://ccsso.org/formative-assessment-students-and-teachers-fast-collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer (s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. (2011). Informing Writing: The Benefits of Formative Assessment. A Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. G. & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K.R., Graham, S., Brindle, M., & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition and children’s writing. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 131–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. (1992) The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, E. A. (2000). A case study of assessment in a grade 10 English course. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 276–286.
   Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308329306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of educational research, 86(4), 945–980.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta‐analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
   Google Scholar
• Kost, C. (2011). Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 606–620.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J. Cusimano, A., Wang, D., & Yim, S. (2018). Writing Together: Online Synchronous Collaboration in Middle School. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(2), 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., Yim, S., Wolters, A. P., & Cusimano, A. (2019). Supporting Online Synchronous Collaborative Writing in the Secondary Classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63(2), 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. Illeris K, ed. Contemporary Learning Theories (Routledge, London), 200–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289, 331.
   Google Scholar
• Mangano, N., & Allen, J. (1986). Teachers’ beliefs about language arts and their effect on student beliefs and instruction. In National Reading Conference Yearbook. National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Maynes, N. (2012). Examining a False Dichotomy: The Role of Direct Instruction and Problem Solving Approaches in Today’s Classrooms. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach Social & Behavioral Science Series. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558
   Google Scholar
• McManus, S. (2017). Attributes of Effective Formative Assessment (pp. 3–6) (U.S.A., Council of Chief State School Officers, Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers).
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, L., Richardson, T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50(4), 537–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6363-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12440261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2009). P21 framework definitions. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, P. S. (2018). The professional development needs of rural high school principals: A seven-state study. The Rural Educator, 28(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v28i3.475
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2009 October). Language in academic subject areas and classroom instruction: What is academic language and how can we teach it. Paper presented at workshop on The role of language in school learning sponsored by The National Academy of Sciences, Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cfe/Paper_Mary_Schleppegrell.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, D. E. (2015). Constructivism and learning in the age of social media: Changing minds and learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(144), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20160
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (2014). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
   Google Scholar
• Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Treleaven, L. (1994). Making a space: A collaborative inquiry with women as staff development. In P. Reason (Ed.), Participation in human inquiry (pp. 138–162). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, M., Towndrow, P. A., & Wiz, C. (2010). Conditions for successful online document collaboration. TechTrends, 54(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0359-6
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Weurlander, M., Söderberg, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2012). Exploring formative assessment as a tool for learning: students’ experiences of different methods of formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.572153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, E. (2008). Formative Assessment: Examples of Practice (United States, Council of Chief State School Officers, State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards). Retrieved September 24, 2018, from https://www.ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/Formative_Assessment_Examples_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yim, S., Wang, D., Olson, J., Vu, V., & Warschauer, M. (2017, February). Synchronous Collaborative Writing in the Classroom: Undergraduates’ Collaboration Practices and their Impact on Writing Style, Quality, and Quantity. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 468–479). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Yim, S., Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., & Lawrence, J. F. (2014). Cloud‐based collaborative writing and the common core standards. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zinger, D., Krishnan, J., Warschauer, M. (2018). Bridging Student Digital Divides by Bridging Teacher Digital Divides. In A. Normore, & A. I. Lahera (Eds.) Crossing the Bridges of the Digital Divide: A Walk with Global Leaders. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zinger, D., Krishnan, J., Gilbertson, N., & Harris, K. (2019). Leading Teacher Professional Learning: Shared Language for Shared Goals. In Handbook of Research on Strategic Communication, Leadership, and Conflict Management in Modern Organizations (pp. 177–197). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar