A 17-Week Teacher-Implemented Story Writing Intervention With Year 2 Students in New Zealand: A Mixed Methods Study

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., Cook, L., & Landrum, T. J. (2013). Moving research into practice: Can we make dissemination stick? Exceptional Children, 79(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, K., & McCrudden, M. T. (2019a). Teacherimplemented writing instruction for elementary students: A literature review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36, 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1604278
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, K., & McCrudden, M. T. (2019b). Teacher-implemented self-regulated strategy development for story writing with 6-year-olds in a wholeclass setting in New Zealand. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33, 307–322. http://dx.doi.org.helicon.vuw.ac.nz/10.1080/02568543.2019.1568328
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, K., & McCrudden, M. T. (under review). Teacherimplemented SRSD instruction for story writing with year 2 students in New Zealand: A mixed methods study.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., & Weinstein, M. (1995). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2014). Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.1
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2002). POW plus TREE equals powerful opinion essays. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(5), 74–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990203400513
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2006). Improving the writing knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Driscoll, S. A., Sandmel, K., Brindle, M., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). Practice-Based Professional Development for Self-Regulated Strategies Development in Writing: A Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Brindle, M., & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition and children’s writing. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Glasser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 131–153). Erbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Ray, A., Graham, S., & Houston, J. (2019). Answering the challenge: SRSD instruction for close reading of text to write to persuade with 4th and 5th grade students experiencing writing difficulties. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1459–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9910-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. D., Wehby, J. H., Symons, F. J., Moore, T. C., Maggin, D. M., & Sutherland, K. S. (2014). An analysis of preference relative to teacher implementation of intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 214–224. http://doi.org/10.1177/002246913475872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2008). In vivo coding. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 473–473). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n240
   Google Scholar
• Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, B. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 249–324. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leko, M. M. (2014). The value of qualitative methods in social validity research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514524002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2001). Making the most of college. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. W., & Heubusch, J. D. (1996). Issues of social validation in research on serving individuals with emotional or behavior disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 22(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299602200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B., Witt, J., Elliott, S., & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., Brindle, M., Harris, K., Graham, S., Collins, A., & Brown, M. (2016). Illuminating growth and struggles using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating SRSD instruction in writing. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 1105–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9627-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Sandmel, K., Steinbrecher, T. D., Graham, S., Lane, K. L., & Oakes, W. P. (2019). Teachers' voices: Perceptions of effective professional development and classwide implementation of self-regulated strategy development in writing. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 753–791. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218804146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., FitzPatrick, E., Brown, M., Brindle, M., Owens, J., & Hendrick, R. (2019). Urban teachers’ implementation of SRSD for persuasive writing following practice-based professional development: Positive effects mediated by compromised fidelity. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9864-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nations educational goals. Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, L. M., & Parker, C. E. (2014). A primer for analyzing nested data: Multilevel modeling in SPSS using an example from a REL study (REL 2015–046). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. M., & Jesson, R. (2016). Mapping the landscape of writing instruction in New Zealand primary school classrooms. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 981–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, (2)16, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1987.12085286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddler, B. (2006). Increasing story writing ability through self-regulated strategy development: Effects on young writers with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2007). The relationship between writing knowledge and writing performance among more and less skilled writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560701277575
   Google Scholar
• Saddler, B., Moran, S., Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2004). Preventing writing difficulties: The effects of planning strategy instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers. Exceptionality, 12(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1201_2
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology. (Vol. 4., pp. 251–288) Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. L., Hoskyn, M., Jai, D., Ellis, P., & Watson, K. (2008). The comparative efficacy of two approaches to teaching sixth graders opinion essay writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 757–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbrunn, S., & Bruning, R. (2013). Improving the writing and knowledge of emergent writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar