Using Elements of a Screenplay to Promote Visualization and Increase Reading Comprehension in Secondary Students with High Incidence Disabilities

References

• Allington, R. & McGill-Franzen , (2013). Comprehension difficulties among struggling readers. In J. Ippolito, J. F. Lawrence & C. Zaller (Eds.), Adolescent literacy in the era of the common core (pp. 551–568). Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alturki, N. (2017). The effectiveness of using group story-mapping strategy to improve reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(18), 915–926.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, K. D., Kennedy, M. J., Brown, T. S., & Solis, M. (2015). Story grammar instruction with third and fifth grade students with learning disabilities and other struggling readers. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13(1), 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, L., & Dial, M. (1995). Scripting screenplays: An idea for integrating writing, reading, thinking, and media literacy. The English Journal, 84(2), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/821058
   Google Scholar
• Boon, R. T., Paal, M., Hintz, A., & Cornelius-Freyre, M. (2015). A review of story mapping instruction for secondary students with LD. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13(2), 117.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J., & Scanlon, D. (2019). Methods and strategies for teaching students with high incidence disabilities (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, J. N., Martinez, J., & Pienta, R. S. (2015). Effects of story mapping on third-grade students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Pedagogy, 6(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0006
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research (3rd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Commonlit.org. (2019, February). commonlit.org/en/library?genres=Short20%Story
   Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., Campano, G., & Harste, J. C. (2009). Transactional theory and critical theory inreading comprehension. In Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 177–188). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, B. (1983). Think-aloud: Modeling the cognitive process of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2013). Becoming part of the story! refueling the interest in visualization strategies for reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 25(2), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9222-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derado, J., Garner, M., Edwards, B. P., & Garrett, V. L. (2010). The story of the Trojan octagon. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(3), 172–179.
   Google Scholar
• Deshler, D. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Nair, M. (2007). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers. International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, K., Pleban, F. T., & Wood, R. J. (2005). Lights, camera, action: Integrating popular film in the health classroom. The Journal of School Health, 75(7), 271–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domke, L. M., Weippert, T. L., & Apol, L. (2018). Beyond school breaks: Reinterpreting the uses of film in classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmann, A., & Metzger, M. (2013). Discussion in practice: Sharing our learning curve. In J. Ippolito, J. F. Lawrence & C. Zaller (Eds.), Adolescent literacy in the era of the common core (pp. 103–116). Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, S. (2005). Screenplay: The art of screenwriting. Bantam Dell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fore, C., III, Scheiwe, K., Burke, M. D., & Boon, R. T. (2007). Teaching a story mapping procedure to high school students with specific learning disabilities to improve reading comprehension skills. Learning Disabilities, 14(4), 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafreniere, M. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9170-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünke, M., & Leidig, T. (2017). The effects of an intervention combining peer tutoring with story mapping on the text comprehension of struggling readers: A case report. Educational Research Quarterly, 41(1), 41.
   Google Scholar
• Grünke, M., Wilbert, J., & Stegemann, K. C. (2013). Analyzing the effects of story mapping on the reading comprehension of children with low intellectual abilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 11(2), 51.
   Google Scholar
• Gorlewski, J. (2009). Research for the classroom. English Journal, 98(4), 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD and EMR reconsidered. The Journal of Special Education, 11(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697701100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isikdogan, N., & Kaigin, T. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness of the story-map method on reading comprehension skills among students with mental retardation. Educational Science Theory Practice, 10(3), 1509–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, V. L., Cain, K., & Mari, N. (2007). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: Does mental imagery training help? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(6), 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601084402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2000). Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehenders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 772–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/00220663.92.4.772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2014). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kocaarslan, M. (2016). An exploratory study of the relationships between reading comprehension competence, reading attitude and the vividness of mental imagery among Turkish fourth-grade students. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 675–686.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, A., Elliot, S. N., Lemons, C. J., Zigmond, N., Kloo, A., & Kettler, R. J. (2014). Assessing opportunity-to-learn for students with disabilities in general and special education classes. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508414522685
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, J., & Looney, J. (2013). Multiple texts in practice fostering accessibility, engagement and comprehension. In J. Ippolito, J. F. Lawrence & C. Zaller (Eds.), Adolescent literacy in the era of the common core (pp. 163–180). Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeal, K. S., Spry, J. M., Mitra, R., & Tipton, J. L. (2014). Measuring student engagement, knowledge, and perceptions of climate change in an introductory environmental geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-111.1
   Google Scholar
• Melekoglu, M. (2011). Impact of motivation to read on reading gains for struggling readers with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711421761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• National Joint Committee of Learning Disabilities. (2008). Adolescent literacy and other students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel, (U. S.). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• NAEP. (2017). Nations report card- National Assessment of Educational Progress- NAEP. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
   Google Scholar
• Nayir, F. (2017). The relationship between student motivation and class engagement levels. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(71), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.71.4
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2015). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal of Research in Reading, 14(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00012.x
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, S., & Bidin, A. (2015). The impact of multimedia graphic and text with autistic learners in reading. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(12), 989–996. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031206
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, L. T. (2006). Visualizing worlds from words on a page. Language Arts, 83(6), 492–500. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41962144
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P.D., Palincsar, A.S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A.I. (Eds.). (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. National Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group, & Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. RAND. https://doi.org/10.7249/mr1465oeri
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1981). On the aesthetic as the basic model of the reading process. In H. R. Garvin (Ed.), Theories of reading, looking and listening. Bucknell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabornie, E. J., Evans, C., & Cullinan, D. (2006). Comparing characteristics of high incidence disability groups: A descriptive analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270020701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, V. M., & O’Connor, R. E. (2015). Building tier 3 intervention for long-term slow growers in grades 3–4: A pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 30(4), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuss, D. (1957). The cat in the hat. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, B. (2005). Save the cat. Michael Wiese Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T. (2010). Using story grammar to assist students with learning disabilities and reading difficulties improve their comprehension. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(1), 115–151.
   Google Scholar
• UDL Guidelines. (n.d.). udlguidelines.cast.org
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Fall, A. M., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Swanson, E., & Martinez, L. R. (2019). Class percentages of students with reading difficulties on content knowledge and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Lawson, M. J., & Curtis, D. D. (2015). The effect of image quality training on reading comprehension of EFL students using the keyword method. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Mitchell, M. A., Clancy, E. E., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 258–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Swanson, E., Kurz, L. A., Shelton, A., & Vaughn, S. (2020). Enhancing reading comprehension in middle school classrooms using a critical reading routine. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219855738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. D. (2001). Improving comprehension with think-aloud strategies. Scholastic, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar