Universal Screening with aimswebPlus Reading in Middle School

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. https://www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/standards_2014edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. L., Biancarosa, G., Park, B. J., Bousselot, T., Smith, J., Baker, S. K., Kame’enui, E. J., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2015). Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in grades 7 and 8. Reading and Writing, 28(1), 57–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, H., & Gefeller, O. L. A. F. (1997). Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Statistics in Medicine, 16(9), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9%3C981::AID-SIM510%3E3.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, N. H., Keller-Margulis, M. A., Scholten, T., & Yoon, M. (2016). Screening assessment within a multi-tiered system of support: Current practices, advances, next steps. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 187–213). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. M., Hixson, M. D., Shaw, A., & Johnson, G. (2014). Classification accuracy of oral reading fluency and maze in predicting performance on large-scale reading assessments. Psychology in the Schools, 51(6), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21773
   Google Scholar
• Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2004). Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. BMJ, 329(7458), 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Barth, A. E., Fletcher, J. M., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M., & Francis, D. J. (2011). The relations among oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension in middle school: Implications for identification and instruction of students with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading: The Official Journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 15(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2017). Critique of the national evaluation of response to intervention: A case for simpler frameworks. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917693580
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
   Google Scholar
• Geverdt, D. (2019). Education demographic and geographic estimates program (EDGE): Locale boundaries file documentation (NCES 2018-115). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/docs/EDGE_NCES_LOCALE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. A., & Albers, C. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Resources Research Organization. (2016). Independent evaluation of the validity and reliability of the STAAR grades 3 through 8 assessment scores: Part 2. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/Independent%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Validity%20and%20Reliability%20of%20STAAR%20Grades%203-8%20Assessments_Part2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, C.S., Rahman, T., and Yee, D.S. (2021). Mapping state proficiency standards onto the NAEP scales: results from the 2019 NAEP reading and mathematics assessments (NCES 2021-036). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED612877.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, S. C., Wanzek, J., & Yun, J. (2019). Screening in the upper elementary grades: Identifying fourth-grade students at-risk for failing the state reading assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 44(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418758371
   Google Scholar
• Kilgus, S. P., Methe, S. A., Maggin, D. M., & Tomasula, J. L. (2014). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening. Journal of School Psychology, 52(4), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingbeil, D. A., Van Norman, E. R., Nelson, P. M., & Birr, C. (2018). Evaluating screening procedures across changes to the statewide achievement test. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 44(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417747390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley, T. (2019). mitools: Tools for multiple imputation of missing data (version 2.4). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mitools
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson, Inc. (2016). aimswebPlus Development manual.
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson, Inc. (2017). aimswebPlus Technical Manual.
   Google Scholar
• NCS Pearson, Inc. (2018). aimswebPlus Tiers guide. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. M., Van Norman, E. R., & Lackner, S. K. (2016). A comparison of methods to screen middle school students for reading and math difficulties. School Psychology Review, 45(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-3.327-342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. M., Van Norman, E. R., & VanDerHeyden, A. (2017). Reduce, reuse, recycle: The longitudinal value of local cut scores using state test data. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(7), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916658567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendergast, L. L., Youngstrom, E. A., Ruan-Iu, L., & Beysolow, D. (2018). The nomogram: A decision-making tool for practitioners using multitiered systems of support. School Psychology Review, 47(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0097.V47-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prewett, S., Mellard, D. F., Deshler, D. D., Allen, J., Alexander, R., & Stern, A. (2012). Response to intervention in middle schools: Practices and outcomes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2021). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 2.1.9). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Robitzsch, A., Grund, S. (2021). miceadds: Some additional multiple imputation functions, especially for ‘mice’ (R package Version 3.11-6). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=miceadds
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg Patton, K. L., Reschly, A. L., & Appleton, J. (Curriculum-based measurement as a predictor of performance on a state assessment: Diagnostic efficiency of local norms. Educational Assessment, 19(4), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.964117
   Google Scholar
• Savitz, R. S., Allen, A. A., & Brown, C. (2022). Variations in RTI literacy implementation in grades 6-12: A national study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 61(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.1887416
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., & McMaster, K. (2019). Relations between CBM (oral reading and maze) and reading comprehension on state achievement tests: A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 73, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. (2005). Formative assessment using CBM-R cut scores to track progress toward success on statemandated achievement tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300402
   Google Scholar
• Smolkowski, K., & Cummings, K. D. (2015). Evaluation of diagnostic systems: The selection of students at risk of academic difficulties. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508415590386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, D. L., Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Walker, C. Y., & Andrusik, K. N. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., Sergeant, E. (2021). epiR: Tools for the analysis of epidemiological data (v. 2.0.38). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=epiR
   Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240(4857), 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo, S., & Sinclair, B. B. (2019). Readability of the STAAR test is still misaligned. Schooling, 10(1), 1–12. http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Szabo,%20Susan%20Readability%20of%20STARR%20%20is%20%20Misaligned%20Schooling%20V10%20N1,2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Texas Educational Agency. (2017). State of Texas assessments of academic readiness (STAAR®) performance labels and policy definitions. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/STAAR_Performance_Labels_and_Policy_Definitions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Texas Educational Agency. (2019). Technical digest 2017-2018: State of Texas assessment of academic readiness (Chapter 4). https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/TechDigest_2017_2018_Chapter4_r3_tagged.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. (2019). 2019 assessments final report: Part 1 (OSP# 201902572-001). University of Texas at Austin. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/staarstudypartifinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, N., Cook, D., McBain, M., Fay, C. (2021). Naniar: Data structures, summaries, and visualizations for missing data (v. 0.6.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=naniar
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2013). Universal screening may not be for everyone: Using a threshold model as a smarter way to determine risk. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2018). Improving decision making in school psychology: Making a difference in the lives of students, not just a prediction about their lives. School Psychology Review, 47(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0042.V47-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanMeveren, K., Hulac, D., & Wollersheim-Shervey, S. (2020). Universal screening methods and models: Diagnostic accuracy of reading assessments. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(4), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418819797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Norman, E. R., Klingbeil, D. A., & Nelson, P. M. (2017). Posttest probabilities: An empirical demonstration of their use in evaluating the performance of universal screening measures across settings. School Psychology Review, 46(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0046.V46-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Norman, E. R., Nelson, P. M., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2017). Single measure and gated screening approaches for identifying students at-risk for academic problems: Implications for sensitivity and specificity. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 32(3), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Denton, C. A., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Cirino, P. T., Barth, A. E., & Romain, M. A. (2008). Response to intervention with older students with reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnes, G. R., Bolker, B., Lumley, T., Johnson, R. C. (2018). gmodels: Various R programming tools for model fitting (Version 2.18.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gmodels
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Francois, R., Henry, L., Muller, K. (2022). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation (Version 1.0.8). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. (2010). Predicting performance on state achievement tests using curriculum-based measurement in reading: A multilevel meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar