More Errors, Better Results? The Relationship Among High-Stakes Test Achievement, Reading Error Types, and Reading Fluency in Different Text Types

References

• Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 478–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. (2013). Modeling the connections between word recognition and reading. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading (pp. 783–806). Newark, New Jersey: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Akın Arıkan, Ç., Kanık Uysal, P., Bilge, H., & Yıldırım, K. (2022). Reliability of ratings of Multidimensional Fluency Scale with Many-Facet Rasch Model. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 470–491. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.974214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyol, H. (2015). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi [Primary teaching of reading and writing in Turkish]. Ankara: PegemA.
   Google Scholar
• Akyol, H., Yıldırım, K., Ateş, S., Çetinkaya, Ç., & Rasinski, T. V. (2014). Okumayı değerlendirme: Öğretmenler için kolay ve pratik bir yol [Assessing reading: an easy and practical way for teachers]. Ankara: PegemA.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın Akay, A. (2004). İlköğretim 2. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin matematik problemlerini çözme başarısına etkisi [Effects of 2nd grade elementary school students’ reading comprehension skills on success of solving math problems] [Unpublished master thesis]. Marmara University.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seeley, J. R., Kame’enui, E. J., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low-performing, high-poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2008.12087905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başaran, M. (2013). Reading fluency as an indicator of reading comprehension. Educational Sciences Theory and Practice, 13(4), 2287–2290. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1922
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. (1942). An analysis of errors in word recognition made by retarded readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059948
   Google Scholar
• Best, R., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2004). Understanding the fourth-grade slump: Comprehension difficulties as a function of reader aptitudes and text genre. San Diego, CA: 85th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Biemiller, A. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 6(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/747049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilge, H., & Kalenderoğlu, İ. (2022). The relationship between reading fluency, writing fluency, speaking fluency, reading comprehension, and vocabulary. Ted Eğitim VE Bilim, 47(209), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2022.9609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björn, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2016). Primary school text comprehension predicts mathematical word problem-solving skills in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.992392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomquist, C. L. (2017). An examination of the relationship of oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, reading comprehension, and the Colorado State Reading Assessment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, J., & Torgesen, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and a performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCRR Tech. Rep. No. 1). Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED587688.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. S. (2008). Comprehension assessment. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research using SPSS]. Ankara: PegemA.
   Google Scholar
• Caner, H. A., & Bayhan, S. (2020). High-stakes examination policies and transformation of the Turkish education system. International Journal of Educational Development, 79, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caywood-Rukad, D. (2009). The predictive validity of early reading curriculum-based measurement of high-stakes tests in grades 3, 4 and 5 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Loyola University.
   Google Scholar
• Ceran, D., & Deniz, K. (2015). TEOG sınavı sorularının okuma becerisiyle çözülebilme düzeyi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.62200
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J. (2005). High-stakes testing: Contexts, characteristics, critiques, and consequences. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 23–54). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1968). A syntactic analysis of reading errors. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7(2), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80029-5
   Google Scholar
• Clore, G., & Ketelaar, T. (1997). Minding our emotions: On the role of automatic, unconscious affect. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (pp. 105–119). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core Standarts Initiative (2022). English Language Arts Standards. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
   Google Scholar
• Conradi Smith, K., Amendum, S. J., & Jang, B. G. (2020). Predicting performance on a 3rd grade high-stakes reading assessment. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. G. (2003). The utility of DIBELS as a curriculum based measurement in relation to reading proficiency on high-stakes tests [Unpublished master thesis]. Marshall University.
   Google Scholar
• Coomber, J. E. (1972). A psycholinguistic analysis of oral reading errors made by good, average, and poor readers. (Report No. 232). Wisconsin: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, The University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Stieber, S. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide achievement tests. Educational Assessment, 7(4), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0704_04
   Google Scholar
• Daini, R., Albonico, A., Malaspina, M., Martelli, M., Primativo, S., & Arduino, L. S. (2013). Dissociation in optokinetic stimulation sensitivity between omission and substitution reading errors in neglect dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 581–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devena, S. (2013). Relationship of oral reading fluency probes on students’ reading achievement test scores [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Roberts, K. L. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 74–86). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968709547585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, G. (1937). The relation between eye-movements and voice in the oral reading of good and poor silent readers. Psychological Monographs, 48(3), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093394
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 25 step by step: A simple guide and reference (15th ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godde, E., Bosse, M.-L., & Bailly, G. (2020). A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09968-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffreda, C. T., Diperna, J. C., & Pedersen, J. A. (2009). Preventive screening for early readers: Predictive validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). Psychology in the Schools, 46(6), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1964). A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading. Elementary English, 42, 633–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M. (1970). Using children’s reading miscues for new teaching strategies. The Reading Teacher, 23(5), 455–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M., & Goodman, K. S. (2013). To err is human: Learning about language processes by analyzing miscues. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading (pp. 525–543). Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the behavioral science. (10th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, K., & Leufkens, S. (2018). Transparent and non-transparent languages. Folia Linguistica, 52(1), 139–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollinger, J. L. (2009). The relationship between students’ reading performance on diagnostic assessments and the third grade reading achievement test in Ohio [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Bowling Green State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hunley, S. A., Davies, S. C., & Miller, C. R. (2013). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in oral reading fluency and high-stakes tests for seventh grade students. RMLE Online, 36(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2013.11462098
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. (2019). The role of science domain knowledge and reading motivation in predicting informational and narrative reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An international study. Learning and Individual Differences, 76, 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanık Uysal, P., & Bilge, H. (2019). An investigation on the relationship between reading fluency and level of reading comprehension according to the type of texts. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019248590
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, L., & Pearson, H. (1996). Genres and learning to read. Literacy, 30(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.1996.tb00842.x
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, H. (2017). Introductory statistics using SPSS. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The relation between students’ math and reading ability and their mathematics, physics, and chemistry examination grades in secondary education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9534-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2013). Fluency: Developmental and remedial practices-revisited. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading (pp. 385–411). Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli, M., Arduino, L. S., & Daini, R. (2011). Two different mechanisms for omission and substitution errors in neglect dyslexia. Neurocase, 17(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2010.498382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education (2018). Eğitim analiz ve değerlendirme raporları serisi Liselere Geçiş Sistemi (LGS) [Performance of students placed in 2018 High School Entrance System (LGS) central examination]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education of Türkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. (2019). Türkçe dersi̇ öğreti̇m programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Turkish Language Lesson Curriculum (Primary and secondary school 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8th grades)]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education of Türkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. (2022). Okul türleri, ortaöğretim kurumlarının amaçları, anadolu liseleri, fen liseleri, sosyal bilimler liseleri [Types of schools, aims of secondary education institutions, Anatolian high schools, science high schools, social sciences high schools]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education of Türkiye. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/kau-huzeyfe-pc/Downloads/09162636_Okul_Turleri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & Houwer, J. D. (2007). What is automaticity? An analysis of its component features and their interrelations. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processess. (pp. 11–50). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, G. P., Sudweeks, R. R., Morrison, T. G., & Wilcox, B. (2014). Reliability of ratings of children’s expressive reading. Reading Psychology, 35(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.675417
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary school in 35 countries. Chestnust Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Nese, J. F. T., Park, B. J., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2011). Applied curriculum-based measurement as a predictor of high-stakes assessment: Implications for researchers and teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1086/659034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ohaver, A. R. (1971). A comparison study of semantic and syntactic cueing by low reading performance college freshmen. In N. F. Greene (Ed.), Investigation relating to mature reading, Twenty first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 110–118). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Page, W. D. (1970). A psycholinguistic description of patterns of miscues generated by a proficient reader in second grade, an average reader in fourth grade, and an average reader in sixth grade encountering ten basal reader selections ranging from pre-primer to sixth grade [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2012). Is fluent, expressive reading important for high school readers? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polesel, J., Dulfer, N., & Turnbull, M. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Sydney: The Whitlam Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, Hawai‘i: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. (2010). The fluent reader. New York: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Padak, N. D., McKeon, C. A., Wilfong, L. G., Friedauer, J. A., & Heim, P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Paige, D., Rains, C., Stewart, F., Julovich, B., Prenkert, D., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2017). Effects of intensive fluency instruction on the reading proficiency of third-grade struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(6), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1250144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Samuels, S. J., Hiebert, E., Petscher, Y., & Feller, K. (2011). The relationship between a silent reading fluency instructional protocol on students’ reading comprehension and achievement in an urban school setting. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903346873
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratliff, C. H. (2007). The relationship between reading and science achievement of fifth grade students as measured by the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Test [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Houston.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, A. D., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S. M., Hudson, R. F., & Torgesen, J. K. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotberg, I. C. (2006). Assessment around the world. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250202300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. (2019). İstatistikten nefret edenler için istatistik [Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics]. (A. Çuhadaroğlu, Trans.). Ankara: PegemA. (Original work published 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Schale, F. C. (1966). Changes in oral reading errors at elementary and secondary levels. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 1(4), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345126600100408
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Keller, M. A., Lutz, J. G., Santoro, L. E., & Hintze, J. M. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282905285237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storie, G. L. (2011). Can oral reading fluency scores on DIBELS ORF predict ISTEP results [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ball State University.
   Google Scholar
• Taşkın, G., & Aksoy, G. (2021). School administrators’ opinions on the system of transition to high schools. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(2), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.743399
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R.-M. (1968). The study of oral reading errors: A survey of the literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 4(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/747099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R.-M. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors. Reading Research Quarterly, 5(3), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/747079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, K., Rasinski, T., & Kaya, D. (2017). Fluency and comprehension of expository texts in Turkish students in grades four through eight. Ted Eğitim VE Bilim, 42(192), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.7318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, K., Yıldız, M., Ateş, S., & Rasinski, T. (2010). Fifth-grade Turkish elementary school students’ listening and reading comprehension levels with regard to text types. Educational Sciences Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1879–1891.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, M., Kanık Uysal, P., Bilge, H., Patricia Wolters, A., Saka, Y., Yıldırım, K., & Rasinski, T. (2019). Relationships between Turkish eighth-grade students’ oral reading efficacy, reading comprehension and achievement scores on a high-stakes achievement test. Reading Psychology, 40(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2018.1555363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız, M., Yıldırım, K., Ateş, S. & Çetinkaya , Ç. (2009). An evaluation of the oral reading fluency of 4th graders with respect to prosodic characteristic. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 353–360.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. S., Rasinski, T., Was, C. A., Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., Kruse, S. D., & Nikbakht, E. (2019). Enhancing outcomes for struggling readers: Empirical analysis of the fluency development lesson. Reading Psychology, 40(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2018.1555365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zutell, J., & Rasinski, T. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502
   Google Scholar