Institutional Diffusion of eParticipation in the English Local Government: Is Central Policy the Way Forward?

REFERENCES

• Bauer , M. W. 2000 . “ Classical content analysis: A review ” . In Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound: A practical handbook , Edited by: Bauer , M. W. and Gaskell , G. 131 – 151 . London , , England : SAGE .
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2011). 100,000 sign petition calling for EU referendum. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14834871 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14834871)
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers , V. and Homburg , V. 2007 . The myths of E-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government . The Information Society , 23 ( 5 ) : 373 – 382 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochel , C. in press . Petitions systems: Contributing to representative democracy? Parliamentary Affairs. ,
   Google Scholar
• Carman , C. 2010 . The process is the reality: Perceptions of procedural fairness and participatory democracy . Political Studies , 58 ( 4 ) : 731 – 751 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick , A. and May , C. 2003 . Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “E-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union . Governance - An International Journal of Policy and Administration , 16 ( 2 ) : 271 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman , S. 2004 . “ The future of the internet and democracy beyond metaphors, towards policy ” . In Promise and problems of e-Democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement , Edited by: Caddy , J. and Vergez , C. 143 – 162 . Paris , , France : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Colombo , C. September 2010 2010 . “ E-participation experiences and local government in Catalonia: An explanatory analysis ” . In IFIP 2nd International Conference on eParticipation, LNCS 6229 , Edited by: Tambouris , E. , Macintosh , A. and Glassey , O. September 2010 , 82 – 94 . Switzerland : Lausanne .
   Google Scholar
• Communities and Local Government. (2008). Local petitions and calls for action consultation: Government response. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/906840.pdf (http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/906840.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Communities and Local Government. (2009). Listening to communities: Consultation on draft statutory guidance on the duty to respond to petitions. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/petitionsresponseconsultation (http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/petitionsresponseconsultation)
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank , P. and Smith , C. 2011 . Understanding the “E-petitioner . Transforming Government: People Process and Policy , 5 ( 4 ) : 319 – 329 .
   Google Scholar
• Dawes , S. S. 2008 . The evolution and continuing challenges of E-governance . Public Administration Review , 68 ( s1 ) : 86 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio , P. J. and Powell , W. W. 1983 . The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields . American Sociological Review , 48 : 147 – 160 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain , J. 2008 . “ Bureaucratic reform and E-government in the united states: An institutional perspective ” . In The handbook of internet politics , 1st , Edited by: Chadwick , A. and Howard , P. N. 99 – 113 . New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen , H. Z. and Damsgaard , J. 2007 . Dawn of E-government – An institutional analysis of seven initiatives and their impact . Journal of Information Technology , 22 ( 1 ) : 13 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring , S. C. 2010 . “ Web content analysis: Expanding the paradigm ” . In International handbook of internet research , 1st , Edited by: Hunsinger , J. , Klastrup , L. and Herring , M. A. 233 – 249 . Berlin , , Germany : Springer Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr , A. and Jürgens , P. 2010 . The political click: Political participation through E-petitions in Germany . Policy & Internet , 2 ( 4 ) : 131 – 165 .
   Google Scholar
• Lindner , R. and Riehm , U. 2009 . Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. International parliamentary e-petition systems in comparative perspective . EJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government , 1 ( 1 ) : 1 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Lindner , R. and Riehm , U. 2011 . Broadening participation through E-petitions? An empirical study of petitions to the German parliament . Policy & Internet , 3 ( 1 ) : 1 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act. (2009). http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2009/ukpga_20090020_en_1 (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2009/ukpga_20090020_en_1)
   Google Scholar
• Localism Bill. (2010). Localism bill starts a new era of people power. http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/newsroom/1794971 (http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/newsroom/1794971)
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes , V. 2005 . Something old, something new, something borrowed . Policy Studies , 26 ( 3--4 ) : 291 – 309 .
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh , A. 2004 . “ Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process ” . In Promise and problems of eDemocracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement , Edited by: Caddy , J. and Vergez , C. 19 – 142 . Paris: OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh , A. , Malina , A. and Farrell , S. 2002 . “ Digital democracy through electronic petitioning ” . In Advances in digital government , Edited by: McIver , W. J. and Elmagarmid , A. K. 137 – 148 . Boston, MA: Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Medaglia , R. 2007 . Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government . Information Polity , 12 ( 4 ) : 265 – 280 .
   Google Scholar
• Medaglia , R. 2012 . eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011) . Government Information Quarterly , 29 ( 3 ) : 346 – 360 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignerat , M. and Rivard , S. 2009 . Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research . Journal of Information Technology , 24 ( 4 ) : 369 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , L. 2009 . E-petitions at Westminster: The way forward for democracy? . Parliamentary Affairs , 62 ( 1 ) : 162 – 178 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assembly for Wales . 2011 . “ Petitioning: Bringing your issues to light ” . In National Assembly for Wales, Petitions Committee
   Google Scholar
• Number10. (2008). E-petitions: Questions and answers. http://tna.europarchive.org/20080923154820/http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/faq (http://tna.europarchive.org/20080923154820/http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/faq)
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2011). www.statistics.gov.uk/ (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/)
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos , P. and Al-Debei , M. M. September 2010 . “ Engaging with citizens online: Understanding the role of ePetitioning in local government democracy. Paper presented at Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment, St ” . In Anne's College , September , 16 – 17 . University of Oxford .
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos , P. , Al-Debei , M. M. , Fitzgerald , G. and Elliman , T. 2012 . A business model perspective for ICTs in public engagement . Government Information Quarterly , 29 ( 2 ) : 192 – 202 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos , P. and Elliman , T. 2012 . “ Online engagement from the grassroots: Reflecting on over a decade of e-petitioning experience in europe and the UK ” . In Empowering open and collaborative governance: Technologies and methods for on-line citizen engagement in public policy making , Edited by: Charalabidis , Y. and Koussouris , S. 79 – 94 . Berlin , , Germany : Springer-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos , P. , Moody , C. and Elliman , T. September 2011 2011 . “ An overview assessment of e-petitioning tools in the English local government ” . In IFIP 3nd International Conference on eParticipation, LNCS 6847 , Edited by: Tambouris , E. , Macintosh , A. and de Bruijn , H. September 2011 , 204 – 215 . Netherlands : Delft .
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett , L. and Leach , S. 2003 . Local government: Selectivity and diversity . Parliamentary Affairs , 56 ( 2 ) : 255 – 269 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratchett , L. , Wingfield , M. and Polat , R. K. 2006 . Local democracy online: An analysis of local government web sites in England and Wales . International Journal of Electronic Government Research , 2 ( 3 ) : 75 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , J. and Sæbø , O. 2010 . Designing deliberation systems . The Information Society , 26 ( 3 ) : 228 – 240 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø , Ø. , Rose , J. and Flak , L. S. 2008 . The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area . Government Information Quarterly , 25 ( 3 ) : 400 – 428 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott , J. K. 2006 . “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? . Public Administration Review , 66 ( 3 ) : 341 – 353 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaton , J. 2005 . The Scottish parliament and E-democracy . Aslib Proceedings , 57 ( 4 ) : 333 – 337 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Graft , P. and Svensson , J. 2006 . Explaining eDemocracy development: A quantitative empirical study . Information Polity , 11 : 123 – 134 .
   Google Scholar
• Weerakkody , V. , Dwivedi , Y. K. and Irani , Z. 2009 . The diffusion and use of institutional theory: A cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey . Journal of Information Technology , 24 ( 4 ) : 354 – 368 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. (2011). White house e-petitions. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions (http://https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions)
   Google Scholar
• Whyte , A. , Renton , A. and Macintosh , A. 2005 . E-petitioning in Kingston and Bristol: Evaluation of e-petitioning in the local e-Democracy national project , Edinburgh , , Scotland : Napier University .
   Google Scholar