Understanding eParticipation State of Play in Europe

REFERENCES

• Aichholzer , G. and Westholm , H. 2009 . Evaluating eParticipation projects: Practical examples and outline of an evaluation framework . European Journal of ePractice , 7 : 27 – 44 . ISSN: 1988-625X
   Google Scholar
• Chevallier, M., Warynski, M., & Sdoz, A. (2006). Success factors of Geneva's e-Voting system. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on e-Government, 77–85, Marburg, Germany, April 27–28 http://www.google.com/books?id=KHmF1aZtUaYC&printsec=frontcover&hl=el#v=onepage&q&f=false (http://www.google.com/books?id=KHmF1aZtUaYC&printsec=frontcover&hl=el#v=onepage&q&f=false) (Accessed: November 21 2011, from ).
   Google Scholar
• Dalakiouridou , E. , Smith , S. , Tambouris , E. and Tarabanis , K. 2012 . Electronic participation policies and initiatives in the European Union institutions . Social Science Computer Review , 3 : 297 – 323 .
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen , E. 2007 . “ Conceptualising European public spheres—General, segmented and strong publics ” . In The European Union and the public sphere: a communicative space in the making? , Edited by: Fossum , J. and Schlesinger , P. 23 – 43 . London , , England : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, G. H., Newman, D., McCusker, P., & Murray, M. (2006). E-consultation: evaluating appropriate technologies and processes for citizens' participation in public policy. HEA http://www.nuim.ie/nirsa/econsult/ (http://www.nuim.ie/nirsa/econsult/) (Accessed: from ).
   Google Scholar
• Frances , J. , Levačic , R. , Mitchell , J. and Thompson , G. 1991 . “ Introduction ” . In Markets, Hierarchies & Networks: the coordination of social life , Edited by: Thompson , G. , Frances , J. , Levačic , R. and Mitchell , J. 1 – 20 . London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, H. (2007). Electronic democracy and deliberative consultation on urban projects: Putting e-Democracy into context. Report for the Congress of Regional and Local Authorities. Bremen, Germany: University of Bremen http://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/Creative_final.pdf (http://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/Creative_final.pdf) (Accessed: November 12, 2011, from ).
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, B., Aichholzer, G., Allhutter, D., Freschi, A. C., Macintosh, A., & Westholm, H. (2008). D13.3 booklet: eParticipation Evaluation and Impact. DEMO-net www.demo-net.org (http://www.demo-net.org) (Accessed: from ).
   Google Scholar
• Loukis , E. , Xenakis , A. and Charalabidis , Y. 2010 . An evaluation framework for e-Participation in parliaments . International Journal of Electronic Governance , 3 ( 1 ) : 25 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Lührs , R. , Albrecht , S. , Lübcke , M. and Hohberg , B. September 1–5 2003 . “ How to grow? Online consultation about growth in the city of Hamburg: Methods, techniques, success factors ” . In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eGovernment, (EGOV 2003) September 1–5 , 79 – 84 . Prague , , Czech Republic
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh , A. January 5–8 2004 . “ Characterizing e-Participation in policy-making ” . In Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS-37) January 5–8 , Big Island , HI
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh , A. 2006 . “ eParticipation in policy-making: The research and the challenges ” . In Exploiting the knowledge factory: Issues, applications, case studies , Edited by: Cunningham , P. and Cunningham , M. 364 – 369 . Amsterdam : IOS Press . In
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh , A. and Whyte , A. 2008 . Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation . Transforming Government: People, Process & Policy , 2 ( 1 ) : 16 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Millard , J. 2008 . eGovernment measurement for policy makers . European Journal of ePractice , 4 : 19 – 32 . (, August)
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2003). Promise and problems of e-Democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/11/35176328.pdf (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/11/35176328.pdf) (Accessed: from ).
   Google Scholar
• Panopoulou , E. , Tambouris , E. and Tarabanis , K. 2009 . eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing? . European Journal of ePractice , 7, 15–26
   Google Scholar
• Rowe , G. and Frewer , L. J. 2000 . Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation . Science Technology Human Values , 25 ( 1 ) : 3 – 29 . doi: 10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (2009). D3.1c: Main benefits of eParticipation developments in the EU–A contextualisation with reference to the EU governance regime and the European public sphere. European eParticipation http://islab.uom.gr/eP/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=36&&Itemid=82 (http://islab.uom.gr/eP/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=36&&Itemid=82) (Accessed: from ).
   Google Scholar
• Smith , S. , Macintosh , A. and Millard , J. 2011 . A three-layered framework for evaluating e-Participation . International Journal of Electronic Governance , 4 ( 4 ) : 304 – 321 .
   Google Scholar
• Tambouris , E. , Kalampokis , E. and Tarabanis , K. 2008 . A survey of eParticipation research projects in the European Union . International Journal of Electronic Business (IJEB) , 6 ( 6 ) : 554 – 571 . doi: 10.1504/IJEB.2008.021874
   Google Scholar
• Westholm , H. 2003 . Adaptability in online democratic engagement: A multi-channel strategy to enhance deliberative policies . Communications , 28 ( 2 ) : 205 – 227 .
   Google Scholar