780
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Winning the Hearts and Minds of Business Intelligence Users: The Role of Metadata

, &

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
  • Anilkumar, N., & Joseph, J. (2012). Factors influencing the pre-purchase attitude of consumers: A study. IUP Journal of Management Research, 11(3), 23–53.
  • Baba, V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012). Toward a theory of evidence based decision making. Management Decision, 50(5), 832–867.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1187.
  • Bollen, K., & Long, S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 52–60.
  • Breur, T. (2009). Data quality is everyone’s business— Managing information quality—Part 2. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 11(2), 114–123.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Chiou, J. S., Droge, C. & Hanvanich, S. (2002). Does customer knowledge affect how loyalty is formed? Journal of Service Research, 5(2), 113–124.
  • Crable, E., Brodzinski, J., & Frolick, M. (2008). The intelligent new business electronic application and automated underwriting solution at the western-southern life insurance company. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 155–158.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–331.
  • de Guinea, A. O., & Markus, M. L. (2009). Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 433–444.
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone & McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
  • Dempsey, L., & Heery, R. (1998). Metadata: A current view of practice and issues. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 145–172.
  • Dick, S., & Basu, S. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 22(2), 99–113.
  • Djamasbi, S., Fruhling, A., & Loiacono, E. (2009). The influence of affect, attitude and usefulness in the acceptance of telemedicine systems. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 10(1), 41–58.
  • Even, A., Shankaranarayanan, G., & Watts, S. (2006). Enhancing decision making with process metadata: Theoretical framework, research tool, and exploratory examination. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39) (pp. 209–224), Kauai, HI, January 2006. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
  • Fadel, K. J. (2012). User adaptation and infusion of information systems. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(3), 1–10.
  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
  • Fay, C. P., & Zahay, D. (2005). Why doesn’t marketing use the corporate data warehouse? The role of trust and quality in adoption of data-warehousing technology for CRM applications. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 20(4), 237–244.
  • Fisher, C. W., Smith, I. C., & Ballou, D. P. (2003). The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 170–188.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–51.
  • Foshay, N., Mukherjee, A., & Taylor, A. (2007). Does data warehouse end-user metadata add value? Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 70–79.
  • Frank, O., & Snijders, T. (1994). Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 10(1), 53–67.
  • Gabriel, R., Hoppe, T., & Pastwa, A. (2010). Classification of metadata categories in data warehousing—A generic approach. In Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, (Paper 133), Lima Peru, August 12–15, 2010. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
  • Garson, D. (2006). Statnotes for structural equation modeling [PowerPoint]. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), iii–A7.
  • Giesen, E., Riddleberger, E., Christner, R., & Bell, R. (2010). When and how to innovate your business model, Strategy & Leadership, 38(4), 17–26.
  • Goeke, R. J., Hogue, M., & Faley, R. H. (2010). The impact of gender and experience on the strength of the relationships between perceived data warehouse flexibility, ease-of-use, and usefulness. Information Resources Management Journal, 23(2), 1–19.
  • Gonzales, M. L. (2011). Success factors for business intelligence and data warehousing maturity and competitive advantage. Business Intelligence Journal, 16(1), 22–29.
  • Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 213–236.
  • Grajek, S., & Pirani, J. A. (2012). Top-ten IT issues, 2012. EDUCAUSE Review, 47(3), 36.
  • Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management, 40(3), 221–232.
  • Haley, B., & Watson H. (1998). Managerial considerations. Communications of the ACM, 41(9), 32–37.
  • Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 21–31.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
  • Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Liu, O. R., Sheng, K., & Tam, Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91–112.
  • Huang, T. C., Liu, C., & Chang, D. (2012). An empirical investigation of factors influencing the adoption of data mining tools. International Journal of Information Management, 32(3), 257–270.
  • Isik, O., Jones, M. C., & Sidorova, A. (2011). Business intelligence (bi) success and the role of BI capabilities. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 18(4), 161–176.
  • Jayanthi, R., & Bhatnagar, V. (2011). Role of knowledge management and analytical CRM in business: Data mining based framework. The Learning Organization, 18(2), 131–148.
  • Jordan, J., & Ellen, C. (2009). Business need, data and business intelligence. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 5(1), 10–20.
  • Jourdan, Z., Rainer, R. K., & Marshall, T. E. (2008). Business intelligence: An analysis of the literature. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 121–131.
  • Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2010). The Kimball Group Reader: Relentlessly practical tools for data warehousing and business intelligence. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
  • Kiron, D., Shockley, R., Kruschwitz, N., Finch, G., & Haydock, M. (2012). Analytics: The widening divide. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 1–22.
  • Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
  • Lukman, T., Hackney, R., Popovic, A., Jaklic, J., & Irani, Z. (2011). Business intelligence maturity: The economic transitional context within Slovenia. Information Systems Management, 28(3), 211–220.
  • Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 59–72.
  • Malhotra, N. K. (2005). Attitude and affect: New frontiers of research in the 21st century. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 477–482.
  • Muramatsu, R., & Hanoch, Y. (2005). Emotion as a mechanism for bounded rationality agents: The fast and frugal way. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(2), 201–221.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence customer loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue), 33–44.
  • Olszak, C., & Ziemba, E. (2007). Approach to building and implementing business intelligence systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 2, 135–148.
  • Porat, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2012). It’s a pleasure buying here: The effects of web-store design on consumers’ emotions and attitudes. Human–Computer Interaction, 27(3), 235–251.
  • Power, D. J. (2008). Understanding data-driven decision support systems. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 149–154.
  • Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. (2010). Consumer behavior (10th. ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Schultz, B. (2011). Weaving BI into the corporate fabric. Computerworld, 45(22), 28–30.
  • Sen, A., Ramamurthy, K., & Sinha, A. P. (2012). A model of data warehousing process maturity. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 38(2), 336–353.
  • Shankaranarayanan, G., & Cai, Y. (2006). Supporting data quality management in decision-making. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 302–312.
  • Shankaranarayanan, G., & Even, A. (2004). Managing metadata in data warehouses: Pitfalls and possibilities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 247–274.
  • Shankaranarayanan, G., & Even, A. (2006). The metadata enigma. Communications of the ACM, 49(2), 88–97.
  • Shin, A. (2003). An exploratory investigation of system success factors in data warehousing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 141–170.
  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
  • Vassiliadis, P., Simitsis, A., & Georgantas, P. (2005). A generic and customizable framework for the design of ETL scenarios. Information Systems, 30(7), 492–525.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  • Wang, R., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
  • Watson, H. J., Wixom, B. H., Hoffer, J. A., Anderson-Lehman, R., & Reynolds, A. M. (2006). Real-time business intelligence: Best practices at continental airlines. Information Systems Management, 23(1), 7–18.
  • Watts, S., Shankaranarayanan, G., & Even, A. (2009). Data quality assessment in context: A cognitive perspective. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 202–211.
  • Wells, J. D., & Hess, T. J. (2002). Understanding decision-making in data warehousing and related decision support systems: An explanatory study of a customer relationship management application. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(4), 16–32.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.
  • Yeoh, W., & Koronios, A. (2010). Critical success factors for business intelligence systems. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(3), 23–32.
  • Yeoh, W., Koronios, A., & Gao, J. (2008). Managing the implementation of business intelligence systems: A critical success factors framework. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 4(3), 79–94.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.