Measuring What Matters—Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving. London: Sage. Retrieved from http://books.google.de/books?id=DMbyE1S16kUC
   Google Scholar
• Allman, K., Edler, J., Georghiou, L., Jones, B., Miles, I., Omidvar, O., Ramlogan, R., & Rigby, R. (2011). Measuring Wider Framework Conditions for successful innovation: A system’s review of UK and international innovation data. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Lawton Smith, H., & Oughten, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government, Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. (2011). Working towards a measurement framework for public sector innovation in Australia: A draft discussion paper for the Australian Public Sector Innovation Indicators Project. Retrieved from https://innovation.govspace.gov.au/tools/measuring-and-reporting-part-2/
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blättel-Mink, B. (2006). Compendium of innovation research. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. (2011). Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries: Copenhagen Manual. Aarhus, Denmark: The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA).
   Google Scholar
• Bordieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2007). Social economy organizations in the theory of the firm. In A. Noya & E. Clarence (eds.), The social economy. Building inclusive economies (pp. 23–60). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2009 Global Report. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association & Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of European Policy Advisors (BEPA). (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Caroll, G. R., & Delacroix, J. (1982). Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(2), 169–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double bottom line project: Assessing social impact in double bottom line ventures. Working Paper Series. Berkeley, CA: Center for Responsible Business,University of California Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Crepaldi, C., Rosa, E. de, & Pesce, F. (2012). Workpackage 1: Literature Review on innovation in social services in Europe (sectors of Health, Education and Welfare Services) Report. IRS. A deliverable of the project INNOSERV, European Commission-7th Framework Program. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1987). Social innovation: Management’s new dimension. Long Range Planning, 20(6), 29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2010). Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems – Complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31, 191–211.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 6(31), 899–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillwald, K. (2000). Concepts of social innovation. WZB paper. Berlin: Querschnittsgruppe Arbeit und Ökologie.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendersen, H. (1993, April). Social innovation and citizen movements. Futures, 322–338.
   Google Scholar
• Hippel, E. V. (1995). The sources of innovation ( [Nachdr.]). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). “Soziale Innovation“ im Fokus: Skizze eines gesellschaftstheoretisch inspirierten Forschungskonzepts. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Hubrich, D. K., Schmitz, B., Mildenberger, G., & Bund, E. (2012). The measurement of social economies in Europe–A first step towards an understanding of social innovation: A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical, and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission–7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Huysentruyt, M., & Stephan, U. (2010, July). Social enterprises and service innovation in Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/7-marieke-huysentruyt_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James, S. D., Leiblein, M. J., & Lu, S. (2013). How firms capture value from their innovations. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1123–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovations for productivity in the American corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. A., & Gartner, W. B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: The structural perspective. Structural analysis in the social sciences. Vol. 4. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kondratieff, N. D. (1926). Long economic cycles. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 56, 573–609.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Cultural influences on entrepreneurial orientation: The impact of national culture on risk taking and proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 959–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krlev, G. (2012). Strategies in social entrepreneurship: Depicting entrepreneurial elements and business principles in SEOs from Germany and Bangladesh. Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1), 61–96.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev, G. (2013). Framework conditions for social entrepreneurship–A spotlight on legal and financial issues. Trusts & Trustees, 19(6), 526–534.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lingane, A., & Olsen, S. (2004). Guidelines for social return on investment. California Management Review, 46(3), 116–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marée, M., & Mertens, S. (2012). The limits of economic value in measuring performance of social innovation. In A. Nicholls & A. Murdock (eds.), Social innovation. Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets (pp. 114–138). Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. (1993). Policy Netzwerke und die Logik von Verhandlungsnetzwerken. In A. Windhoff-Héritier (Ed.), Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Sonderheft: Vol. 24. Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (pp. 39–56). Opladen, Germany Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milbergs, E., & Vonortas, N. (2004). Innovation metrics: Measurement to insight. Washington, DC: George Washington University for the National Innovation Initiative 21st Century Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, N., Wilkinson, C., Edler, J., Bleda, M., Simmonds, P., & Clark, J. (2009). The wider conditions for innovation in the UK: How the UK compares to leading innovation nations. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, V., Rosenbusch, N., & Bausch, A. (2013). Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation: A meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1606–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation (Social Innovator Series: Ways to design, develop and grow Social Innovation). London: The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. In A. Nicholls & A. Murdock (eds.), Social innovation. Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets (pp. 1–32). Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2011). How’s life? Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pappi, F. U., & Henning, C. H. C. A. (1998). Policy networks: More than a metaphor? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 553–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1990). Prolegomena to a theory of social institutions. American Sociological Review, 55, 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, R. (2003). Managing and measuring social enterprises. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005): Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008, Fall). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., Stern, S., & Loria, R. A. (2013). Social progress report 2013. Washington, DC: Social Progress Imperative.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, N., O’Sullivan, C., Tucker, S., Ramsden, P., & Mulgan, G. (2012). Strengthening social innovation in Europe: Journey to effective assessment and metrics. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector 2: The problem of classification. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3(3), 267–309.
   Google Scholar
• Schibany, A., & Streicher, G. (2008). The European innovation scoreboard: Drowning by numbers? Science and Public Policy, 35(10), 717–732.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1994). Capitalism, socialism, democracy (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1983). Introduction: From technology to environment. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (eds.), Organizational environments. Ritual and rationality (pp. 9–20). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Foundations for organizational science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Seelos, C., Mair, J., Battilana, J., Dacin, T. M. (2011). The embeddedness of social entrepreneurship: Understanding variation across local communities. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33, 333–363.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford India paperbacks. Delhi, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, D., & Bowman, N. (1985). The entrepreneur: A capable executive and more. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2012). Explaining cooperation between IGOs and NGOs–Push factors, pull factors, and the policy cycle. Review of International Studies, 39(4), 993–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. K., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved from http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: The view of young Schumpeter. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjorth (eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change. A third movements in entrepreneurship book (pp. 21–34). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2009). Schumpeter’s full model of entrepreneurship: Economic, non-economic, and social entrepreneurship. In R. Ziegler (Ed.), An introduction to social entrepreneurship. Voices, preconditions, contexts (pp. 77–106). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• The Young Foundation. (2012). Social Innovation Overview: A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission–7th Framework Program. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31(5), 667–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, M. T. (2008). Measuring and/or estimating social value creation: Insights into eight integrated cost approaches. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Impact Planning and Improvement. Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/documents/wwl-report-measuring-estimating-social-value-creation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tura, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pekkola, S. (2008). Breaking inside the black box: Towards a dynamic evaluation framework for regional innovative capability. Science and Public Policy, 35(10), 733–744.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, A., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Policy innovation in isolation? Public Management Review, 11(3), 375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Jeanes, E. (2001). Innovation in a regulated service: The case of English housing associations. Public Management Review, 3(4), 525–550.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 282–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werlen, B. (2000). Sozialgeographie: Eine Einführung. UTB für Wissenschaft Uni-Taschenbücher (Vol. 1911). Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 74–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windhoff-Héritier, A., Knill, C., & Mingers, S. (1996). Ringing the changes in Europe: Regulatory competition and the transformation of the state: Britain, France, Germany. De Gruyter studies in organization international management, organization and policy analysis (Vol. 74). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wobbe, W. (2012). Measuring social innovation and monitoring progress of EU Policies. In H.-W. Franz (ed.), Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (pp. 309–324). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar