Developing a Value Management Capability: A Literature Study and Exploratory Case Study

REFERENCES

• Akkermans, H., & van Helden, K. (2002). Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mudimigh, A., Zairi, M., & Al-Mashari, M. (2001). ERP software implementation: An integrative framework. European Journal of Information Systems,10(4), 216–226. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal,14(1), 33–46. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., Banker, R., & Ravindran, S. (2006). Value implications of investments in information technology. Management Science,52(9), 1359–1376. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriole, S. (2009). Boards of directors and technology governance: The surprising state of the practice. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems,24(1), 22.
   Google Scholar
• Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 408–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artto, K., Martinsuo, M., Gemünden, H., & Murtoaro, J. (2009). Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management,27(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashurst, C., Doherty, N., & Peppard, J. (2008). Improving the impact of IT development projects: The benefits realization capability model. European Journal of Information Systems,17(4), 352–370. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas Copco. (2009). Annual Report, Sustainability Report, Corporate Governance Report. Atlas Copco AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassellier, G., Reich, B., & Benbasat, I. (2001). Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model. Journal of Management Information Systems,17(4), 159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaroch, M., Lichtenstein, Y., & Robinson, K. (2006). Real options in information technology risk management: An empirical validation of risk-option relationships. MIS Quarterly,30(4), 827–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernroider, E. (2008). IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone–McLean model of information systems success. Information & Management, 45(5), 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly,24, 169–196. doi:10.2307/3250983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A., Bharadwaj, S., & Konsynski, B. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science,45, 1008–1024. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, M., & Philip, G. (2005). Information systems management: role of planning, alignment and leadership. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(5), 391–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management,11(1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM,36(12), 66–77. doi:10.1145/163298.163309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, T. A., & Turner, D. E. (2000). Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: Exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems,17(1), 167–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review Onpoint. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2003/05/it-doesnt-matter
   Google Scholar
• Cha, K., Gregor, S., & Fernandez, W. (2008). Towards a deeper understanding of IT-enabled transformation. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, USA, 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, M., Devaraj, S., & David, P. (2008). Research note—The impact of information technology investments and diversification strategies on firm performance. Management Science,54(1), 224–234. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Chiasson, M., & Davidson, E. (2005). Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quarterly,29(4), 591–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Cavanaugh, N., Brown, C., & Sambamurthy, V. (1997). Building change-readiness capabilities in the IS organization: Insights from the Bell Atlantic experience. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (1988). Organizing knowledge synthesis, a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society,1, 104–126.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology,13(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, M. (2009). Introducing an IT capability maturity framework. In J. Filipe, J. Cordeiro, J. Cardoso, W. Aalst, J. Mylopoulos, M. Rosemann, … C. Szyperski (Eds.), Enterprise information systems (Vol. 12, pp. 63–78). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dao, V., Langella, I., & Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2008). An exploratory study into the design of an IT governance minimum baseline through Delphi research. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 443–458.
   Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management,26(2), 123–137. doi:10.1080/10580530902794786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Reyck, B., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lockett, M., Calderini, S., Moura, M., & Sloper, A. (2005). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management,23(7), 524–537. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.003
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy synthesis: Resolving strategy paradoxes to create competitive advantage (3rd ed.). Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning EMEA.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, D. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review,21(3), 619–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K., & Evaristo, J. (2006). Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes. International Journal of Information Management, 26(5), 414–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, M. J. (1993). Experiences in strategic information systems planning. MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review,14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2007). Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model. Strategic Management Journal,28(4), 431–453. doi:10.1002/smj.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeny, D., & Willcocks, L. (1998). Re-designing the IS function around core capabilities. Long Range Planning,31(3), 354–367. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80003-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken, A., Edwards, C., & Lambert, R. (2009). Executing strategic change: Understanding the critical management elements that lead to success. California Management Review,51(3), 49–73. doi:10.2307/41166493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2005). Critical success factors from IT outsourcing theories: an empirical study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(6), 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review,33, 114–135. doi:10.2307/41166664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Segars, A. (2005). An empirical evaluation of stages of strategic information systems planning: patterns of process design and effectiveness. Information & Management, 42(5), 761–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., Jeong, S., Kettinger, W., & Teng, J. (1995). The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems,12(1), 109–144.
   Google Scholar
• Halaweh, M., Fidler, C., & McRobb, S. (2008). Integrating the grounded theory method and case study research methodology within is research: A possible “road map.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, USA, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal,24(10), 997–1010. doi:10.1002/smj.332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, L., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly,20(2), 121. doi:10.2307/249475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITGI. (2003). Board Briefing on IT Governance (2nd Edition) (p. 65). IT Governance Institute. Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org.
   Google Scholar
• ITGI. (2008). Enterprise value: Governance of IT investments. The Val IT Framework 2.0 (p. 116). IT Governance Institute. Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org
   Google Scholar
• Janz, B., & Prasarnphanich, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences,34(2), 351–384. doi:10.1111/1540-5915.02328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, J., Bhattacherjee, A., Gupta, Y., & Somers, T. (2000). The effects of MIS steering committees on information technology management sophistication. Journal of Management Information Systems,17(2), 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes-Pearce, S. (2005). IT value management in leading firms, the fit between theory and practice (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., & Devaraj, S. (2004). Realizing the business value of information technology investments: an organizational process. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(1), 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. (2002). Managing risks in IT projects: an options perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., Ajjan, H., & Niu, Y. (2008). Information technology portfolio management: literature review, framework, and research issues. Information Resources Management Journal, 21(3), 64–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kydd, C. (1989). Understanding the information content in MIS management tools. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuschagne, C., & Brent, A. (2005). Sustainable project life cycle management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Project Management, 23(2), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lechler, T., & Cohen, M. (2009). Exploring the role of steering committees in realizing value from project management. Project Management Journal,40(1), 42–54. doi:10.1002/pmj.20094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179– 228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentz, C. M., Gogan, J., & Henderson, J. (2002). A comprehensive and cohesive IT value management capability: Case studies in the North American life insurance industry. In Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, USA, 3181–3190.
   Google Scholar
• Letavec, C. (2006). The program management office: Establishing, managing and growing the value of a PMO. J. Florida, USA: Ross Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W., & Shao, B. (2006). The business value of information technology and inputs substitution: The productivity paradox revisited. Decision Support Systems,42(2), 493–507. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Luo, Y., & Liu, T. (2009). Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management,27(4), 294–309. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, M., De Reyck, B., & Sloper, A. (2008). Managing project portfolios. Business Strategy Review, 19(2), 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Luftman, J., & Ben-Zvi, T. (2011). Key issues for IT executives 2011: Cautious optimism in uncertain economic times. MIS Quarterly Executive,10(4), 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, M., Rassau, A., & Danson, J. (2004). Programme management: a critical review. International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 289–299.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, K., De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2012). IT value management as a vehicle to unleash the business value from IT enabled investments: A literature study. International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance,3(1), 47–62. doi:10.4018/jitbag.2012010103
   Google Scholar
• Marble, R. (2003). A system implementation study: management commitment to project management. Information & Management, 41(1), 111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Pearson, J., & Furumo, K. (2007). IS project management: Size, practices and the project management office. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(4), 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsons, M., Davison, R., & Tse, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems, 25(1), 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R., MacMillan, I., & Venkataraman, S. (1995). Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal,16(4), 251–275. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly,28(2), 283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal,13, 233–249. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science,26(3), 322–341. doi:10.1287/mnsc.26.3.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S., Sambamurthy, V., & Westerman, G. (2011). Measuring IT performance and communicating value. MIS Quarterly Executive,10(1), 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moingeon, B., Ramanantsoa, B., Métais, E., & Orton, J. (1998). Another look at strategy–structure relationships: The resource-based view. European Management Journal,16(3), 297–305. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00006-1
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, T., Kekre, S., & Kalathur, S. (1995). Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly,19, 137–156. doi:10.2307/249685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, F., Lau, J., & Kuang, J. (2001). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 285–296.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, R., & McFarlan, F. (2005). Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review,83(10), 96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OGC. (2010). Portfolio, Programme and Project Management Maturity Model. London, UK: Office of Government Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly,31(2), 239–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S. (2002). Shaping context: The role and challenge for programmes. International Journal of Project Management,20(3), 229–233. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00073-4
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S., & Garagna, L. (2009). Towards a conceptualisation of PMOs as agents and subjects of change and renewal. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 649–656.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S., Partington, D., Hemingway, C., Mohdzain, Z., & Shah, M. (2007). The importance of context in programme management: An empirical review of programme practices. International Journal of Project Management,25(1), 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2004). Beyond strategic information systems: Towards an IS capability. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,13(2), 167–194. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2005). Unlocking sustained business value from IT investments. California Management Review,48(1), 52–70. doi:10.2307/41166327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. (2004). Information strategies and tactics for information technology governance. In W. Van Grembergen (Ed.), Strategies for information technology governance. (pp. 37–80). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P., O’Callaghan, R., & Ribbers, P. (2000). Information technology governance by design: Investigating hybrid configurations and integration mechanisms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, USA, 435–452.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumusa, S., & Von Solms, R. (2005). IT oversight: an important function of corporate governance. Computer Fraud & Security, 2005(6), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal,18(5), 375–405. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, G., Muhanna, W., & Barney, J. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly,29(4), 625–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. (1995). A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,16(4), 277–299. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., Beath, C., & Goodhue, D. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review,38(1), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. (1994). IT management competency assessment: A tool for creating business value through IT/IT tool packet. New Jersey, USA: Financial Executives Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly,41, 229–240. doi:10.2307/2393715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, K. (2010). Information Technology: Project Management. Cengage Learning EMEA, Hampshire, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sircar, S., Turnbow, J., & Bordoloi, B. (2000). A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems,16(4), 69–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, C., & Markus, M. (1995). How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems (pp. 29–42). Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon, S. (2009). Achieving competitive advantage through the use of project management under the plan-do-check-act concept. Journal of General Management, 34(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., & Gordon, S. (2007). Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,16(4), 353–392. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, J. (2003). The information paradox: Realizing the business benefits of information technology (2nd ed.). Canada: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Torkzadeh, G., & Xia, W. (1992). Managing telecommunications by steering committee. MIS Quarterly,16, 187–199. doi:10.2307/249575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Zee, J., & De Jong, B. (1999). Alignment is not enough: integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 137– 156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems (pp. 1–13). Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Daniel, E. (2006). Benefits management: delivering value from IS and IT investments. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 418 p.
   Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D., & Sillanpaä, M. (1998). Including the stakeholders: the business case. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WITSA. (2010). Digital planet 2010, executive summary (pp. 1–27). Virginia, USA: WITSA.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2005). Introducing the world of education: A case study reader. California, USA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar