A Role-based Typology of Information Technology: Model Development and Assessment

REFERENCES

• Agarwal, R., & Lucas, H. C. (2005). The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quarterly,29, 381–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, I. R., Krishnan, V. V., & Lin, S. (2007). Project performance and the enabling role of information technology: An exploratory study on the role of alignment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,9, 579–595. doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17, 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research,6, 3–23. doi:10.1287/isre.6.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly,24, 169–196. doi:10.2307/3250983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, G., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems,22, 253–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, H., Van Den Hoof, B., Van De Wijngaert, L., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). Information & communication technology in organizations: Adoption, implementation, use and effects (1st ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives,14, 23–48. doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, G. (2010). A four-dimensional view of IT business value. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,27, 267–284. doi:10.1002/sres.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review,81, 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly,15, 275–292. doi:10.2307/249639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja, R., & Blair, J. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science,32, 554–571. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review,31, 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Davern, M. J., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems,16, 121–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emory, C. W., & Cooper, D. R. (1991). Business research methods. Boston, MA: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank, J. F., Labianca, G., Steensma, H. K., & Metters, R. D. (2006). Information processing design choices, strategy and risk management performance. Journal of Management Information Systems,23, 293–319. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. D., Grover, V., & Teng, J. T. C. (1994). Information technology-enabled change: The risks and rewards of business process redesign and automation. Journal of Information Technology,9, 267–275. doi:10.1057/jit.1994.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, L. W. (1982). Technology-structure research: Three critical issues. The Academy of Management Journal,25, 532–552. doi:10.2307/256078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces,4, 28–36. doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattiker, T. F., & Goodhue, D. L. (2005). What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes? MIS Quarterly,29, 559–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review,33, 114–135. doi:10.2307/41166664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review,68, 104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1997). Information technology and internal firm organization: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems,14, 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision-making. Academy of Management Review,15, 47–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, K. D., Chi, L., Datta, A., & Han, S. (2010). Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Information Systems Research,21, 472–495. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, P. G. W. (1991). Shaping the future: Business design through information technology (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M. (1995). Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly,19, 421–450. doi:10.2307/249627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koellinger, P. (2008). The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance—Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy,37, 1317–1328. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,9, 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, V. (2001). Intra-organizational communication with intranets. Communications of the ACM,44, 95–100. doi:10.1145/379300.379324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2009). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys,26, 87–119. doi:10.1145/174666.174668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2007). The CIO dilemma. Information Week,131, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, A. (2006). Mastering the three worlds of information technology. Harvard Business Review,84, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly,28, 283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, J. G., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (1996). A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. ACM SIGMIS Database,27, 68–81. doi:10.1145/243350.243363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, T., & Cooper, R. B. (1993). A microeconomic production assessment of the business value of management information systems: The case of inventory control. Journal of Management Information Systems,10, 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, P. (2002). Specification of a capability-based IT classification framework. Information & Management,39, 647–658. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00117-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business & management. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization,17, 2–26. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quarterly,27, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences. MIS Quarterly,34, 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, M., Watson, R., & Kavan, C. (1999). Managing the three levels of change. Information Systems Management,16, 63–70. doi:10.1201/1078/43197.16.3.19990601/31317.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research,12, 121–134. doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly,29, 747–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal,18, 375–405. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan, A., Zu, X., & Grover, V. (2008). A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: An empirical investigation. Omega,36, 1105–1125. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems,21, 237–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remenyi, D., Money, A., & Twite, A. (1994). A guide to measuring and managing IT benefits (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: NCC Blackwell Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., & Chan, Y. E. (2001). Alignment between business and IS strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Information Systems Research,12, 11–33. doi:10.1287/isre.12.1.11.9714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly,27, 237–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2000). Research commentary: The organizing logic for an enterprise’s IT activities in the digital era—A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Information Systems Research,11, 105–114. doi:10.1287/isre.11.2.105.11780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1998). Qualitative research: Meanings or practices? Information Systems Journal,8, 3–20. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.1998.00002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sircar, S., & Choi, J. (2009). A study of the impact of information technology on firm performance: A flexible production function approach. Information Systems Journal,19, 313–339. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sircar, S., Turnbow, J. L., & Bordoloi, B. (2000). A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems,16, 69–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2003). IT doesn’t matter—Business processes do. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. Z., & Song, M. (2010). The role of information technologies in enhancing R&D–marketing integration: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management,27, 382–401. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00723.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. W., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1989). Information technologies for the 1990s: An organizational impact perspective. Communications of the ACM,32, 1328–1339. doi:10.1145/68814.68818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon, P. P., Kraemer, K. L., & Gurbaxani, V. (2000). Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems,16, 145–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multi-business firms. MIS Quarterly,29, 311–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, H.-H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (1997). Organizational transformation using electronic data interchange: The case of tradeNet in Singapore. Journal of Management Information Systems,13, 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Turban, E., Leidner, D., McLean, E., & Wetherbe, J. (2009). Information technology for management: Transforming organizations in the digital economy (7th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley International.
   Google Scholar
• Turban, E., Rainer, R. K., & Potter, R. E. (2004). Introduction to information technology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review,3, 613–624.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. (1994). IT-enabled business transformation—From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review,35, 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly,28, 107–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., Griffiths, P., & Whitmore, P. (2002). Strategic planning for information systems (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems,4(2), 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research,3, 307–333. doi:10.1287/isre.3.4.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2009). IT savvy: What top executives must know to go from pain to gain. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westerman, G., & Curley, M. (2008). Building IT-enabled innovation capabilities at Intel. MIS Quarterly Executive,7, 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science,18, 749–762. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zand, F. (2011). Information technology and firm performance: The role of innovation (Doctoral dissertation). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar