Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Introduction and Internal Auditing Legitimacy: An Institutional Analysis

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay of the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abdolmohammadi, M., & Boss, S. (2010). Factors associated with IT audits by the internal audit function. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(3), 140–151. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2010.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mudimigh, A., Zairi, M., & Al-Mashari, M. (2001). ERP software implementation—an integrative framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 216–226. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Twaijry, A. Brierley, J. and Gwilliam, D. (2003). The Development of Internal Audit in Saudi Arabia: An Institutional Theory Perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 507–531.
   Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2006). Internal audit in Italian organizations. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(3), 275–292. doi:10.1108/02686900610653017
   Google Scholar
• Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2007). Internal Audit Departments: Adoption and Characteristics in Italian companies. International Journal of Auditing, 11(2), 94–114.
   Google Scholar
• Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 43–60. doi:10.1111/ijau.2009.13.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. P., Bamberger, P., & Sonnenstuhl, W. J. (1996). The organizational transformation process: The micro politics dissonance reduction and the alignment of logics of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 477–506. doi:10.2307/2393939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S.R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 61–103. doi:10.2307/2393551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, September, 11(3), 396–386.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D. M., Wilkins, A. M., & Hermanson, D. R. (2012). Corporate governance: Preparing for the expanding role of the internal audit function. Internal Auditing, 27(2), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cadbury Report. (1992). The report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London, UK: Gee & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Huang, S. Y., Chiu, A., & Pai, F. (2012). The ERP system impact on the role of accountants. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1), 83–101. doi:10.1108/02635571211193653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, A. (2003). Information technology and productivity payoff in the banking industry: Evidence from the emerging markets. Journal of International Development, 15, 693–708. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1328
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2008). How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 769–782). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–57. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2002.6283388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., Harris, J., & Cantrell, S. (2004). Enterprise systems and ongoing process change. Business Process Management Journal, 10(1), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dillar, J. F., John, T. R., & Goodman, C. (2004). Making and remaking organizational context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506–542. doi:10.1108/09513570410554542
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., & Powell W. W. (Eds.). (1983). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 147–160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebaid, I. E. (2011). Internal audit function: An exploratory study from Egyptian listed firms. International Journal of Law and Management, 53(2), 108–128. doi:10.1108/17542431111119397
   Google Scholar
• Elbardan, H., Ali, M., & Ghoneim, A. (2015). The dilemma of internal audit function adaptation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 93–106. doi:10.1108/JEIM-10-2013-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuß, C., Gmeiner, R., Schiereck, D., & Strahringer, S. (2007). ERP usage in banking: An exploratory survey of the world’s largest banks. Information Systems Management, 24(2), 155–171. doi:10.1080/10580530701221056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosain, S. (2004). Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: The new iron cage? Journal of the Association Information Systems, 5(4), 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Grabski, S. V., Leech, S. A., & Schmidt, P. J. (2011). A review of ERP research: A future agenda for accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 37–78. doi:10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S. M., Hung, W. H., Yen, D. C., Chang, I. C., & Jiang, D. (2011). Building the evaluation model of the IT general control for CPAs under enterprise risk management. Decision Support System, 50, 692–701. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunton, J. E., Wright, A., & Wright, S. (2004). Are financial auditors overconfident in their ability to assess risks associated with enterprise resource planning systems? Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 7–28. doi:10.2308/jis.2004.18.2.7
   Google Scholar
• Ignatiadis, I., & Nandhakumar, J. (2009). The effect of ERP system workarounds on organizational control: An interpretivist case study. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 59–90.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2004). Internal audit consulting activity: Survey results. Retrieved from www.theiia.org/gain/con2_results.html
   Google Scholar
• Kanellou, A., & Spathis, C. (2011). Auditing in enterprise system environment: A synthesis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(6), 494–519. doi:10.1108/17410391111166549
   Google Scholar
• Kanellou, A., & Spathis, C. (2013). Accounting benefits and satisfaction in an ERP environment. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(3), 209–234. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiorgos, T., Drogalas, G., & Dimou, A. (2010). Effectiveness of internal control system in the Greek bank sector. The South European Review of Business Finance & Accounting, 8, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kholeif, A., Abdel-Kader, M., & Sherer, M. (2007). ERP customization failure: Institutionalized accounting practices, power relations and market forces. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 3(3), 250–299. doi:10.1108/18325910710820292
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94. doi:10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., Newman, M., & Al-Muharfi, A. R. (2009). Institutionalizing enterprise resource planning in the Saudi steel industry: A punctuated socio-technical analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 24, 286–304. doi:10.1057/jit.2009.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani, H. (2009). The role of internal auditors in ERP-based organizations. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 5(4), 514–526. doi:10.1108/18325910910994702
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, B., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2010). Delineating the ERP institutionalisation process: Go-live to effectiveness. Business Process Management Journal, 16(4), 744–771. doi:10.1108/14637151011065982
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 37–64). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (Reprinted from Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279–300, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignerat, M., & Rivard, S. (2009). Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 369–391. doi:10.1057/jit.2009.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihret, D. J., Mula, J. A., & James, K. (2012). The development of internal auditing in Ethiopia: The role of institutional norms. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 10(2), 153–170. doi:10.1108/19852511211273705
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nwankpa, J., & Datta, P. (2012). Perceived audit quality from ERP implementations. Information Resources Management Journal, 25(1), 61–80. doi:10.4018/IRMJ
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1996). The institutional embeddedness of economic activity. In J. A. C. Baum & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (pp. 163–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penini, G., & Caemeli, A. (2010). Auditing in organizations: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(1), 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2008). Software and organisations, the biography of the enterprise-wide system or how SAP conquered the world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., Humphrey, C., Khalifa, R., & Jones, J. (2007). Transforming audit technologies: Business risk audit methodologies and the audit field. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 32, 409–438. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saharia, A., Koch, B., & Tucker, R. (2008). ERP systems and internal audit. Issues in Information Systems, XL(2), 578–586.
   Google Scholar
• Sarens, G., Allegrini, M., D’Onza, G., & Melville, R. (2011). Are internal auditing practices related to the age of the internal audit function? Exploratory evidence and directions for future research. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(1), 51–64. doi:10.1108/02686901111090835
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shehab, E., Sharp, M., Supramaniam, L., & Spedding, T. (2004). Enterprise resource planning an integrative review. Business Process Management Journal, 10(4), 359–386. doi:10.1108/14637150410548056
   Google Scholar
• Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000). Cultural fits and misfits: Is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 47–51. doi:10.1145/332051.332070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spathis, C., & Constantinides, S. (2004). Enterprise resource planning systems’ impact on accounting processes. Business Process Management Journal, 10(2), 234–247. doi:10.1108/14637150410530280
   Google Scholar
• Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), 640–61.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryfonas, T., & Kearney, B. (2008). Standardizing business application security assessments with pattern-driven audit automations. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 30(4), 262–270. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W., Chou, Y., Lee, K., Lin, W., & Hwang, E. (2013). Combining decision making trial and evaluation laboratory with analytic network process to perform an investigation of information technology auditing and risk control in an enterprise resource planning environment systems. Research and Behavioral Science, 30, 176–193. doi:10.1002/sres.2129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74–81. doi:10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K., & Berente, N. (2007). An institutional analysis of pluralistic responses to enterprise system implementations. International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social science research methods to questions in library and information science (308 p.). West Port, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar