Determinants of adoption for open-source office applications: A plural investigation

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. (2010). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 576–656. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamgir Hossain, M., & Quaddus, M. (2011). The adoption and continued usage intention of RFID: An integrated framework. Information Technology & People, 24(3), 236–256. doi:10.1108/09593841111158365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavifar, S. A., Karimmalayer, M., & Anuar, M. K. (2012). Structural equation modeling vs multiple regression. Engineering Science and Technology: an International Journal, 2(2), 326–329.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., & Geller, D. (2012). Open source deployment in local government: Rapid innovation as an occasion for revitalizing organizational IT. Information Technology & People, 25(2), 136–155. doi:10.1108/09593841211232631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, M. (2008, December 8). Forrester: Open source delivers cost and quality benefits. Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10118123-16.html.
   Google Scholar
• Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 232–246. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2001). Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 1–16. doi:10.2307/3250956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouras, C., Kokkinos, V., & Tseliou, G. (2013). Methodology for public administrators for selecting between open source and proprietary software. Telematics and Informatics, 30(2), 100–110. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Campbell‐Kelly, M., & Garcia‐Swartz, D. D. (2010). The move to the middle: Convergence of the open‐source and proprietary software industries. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 17(2), 223–252. doi:10.1080/13571516.2010.483091
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. C. J., & King, W. R. (2003). Measuring the performance of information systems: A functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 85–115. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, P. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 1–24. doi:10.2307/249740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chengalur-Smith, I., Sidorova, A., & Daniel, S. (2010). Sustainability of free/libre open source projects: A longitudinal study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 657–683. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123–139. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375–402. doi:10.1177/017084069201300304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. (1979). The diffusion of process innovations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedrick, J., & West, J. (2004). An exploratory study into open source platform adoption. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), Waikoloa, HI, January 5–8, 2004 (p. 80265b). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Deodhar, S. J., Saxena, K. B. C., Gupta, R. K., & Ruohonen, M. (2012). Strategies for software-based hybrid business models. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(4), 274–294. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, Jr., F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37. doi:10.2307/1252055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikebrokk, T. R., & Olsen, D. H. (2007). An empirical investigation of competency factors affecting e-business success in European SMEs. Information & Management, 44(4), 364–383. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, M. S., & Scacchi, W. (2008). Mobilization of software developers: The free software movement. Information Technology & People, 21(1), 4–33. doi:10.1108/09593840810860315
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, B. (2011). Open source software adoption: Anatomy of success and failure. International Journal of Open Source Software & Processes, 1(1), 1–23. doi:10.4018/jossp.2009010101
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, F. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 587–598. doi:10.2307/25148740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaugher, J. M., & Wang, Y.-M. (2002). Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from web server pricing. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 303–327. doi:10.2307/4132311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghapanchi, A. H. (2013). Rallying competencies in virtual communities: A study of core processes and user interest in open source software projects. Information and Organization, 23(2), 129–148. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghapanchi, A. H. (2015). Investigating the interrelationships among success measures of open source software projects. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 25(1), 28–46. doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.990775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghapanchi, A. H., & Tavana, M. (2015). A longitudinal study of the impact of open source software project characteristics on positive outcomes. Information Systems Management, 32(4), 285–298. doi:10.1080/10580530.2015.1079999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghapanchi, A. H., Wohlin, C., & Aurum, A. (2014). Resources contributing to gaining competitive advantage for open source software projects: An application of resource-based theory. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 139–152. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, E., Fitzgerald, B., & Exton, C. (2005). Commercial adoption of open source software: An empirical study. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering. (pp. 225–234). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, A. L. (1985). Software reliability models: Assumptions, limitations, and applicability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-11(12), 1411–1423. doi:10.1109/TSE.1985.232177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hauge, Ø., Ayala, C., & Conradi, R. (2010). Adoption of open source software in software intensive organizations–A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(11), 1133–1154. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods., 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C., Lee, J.-N., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Institutional influences on information systems security innovations. Information Systems Research, 23(3–Part–2), 918–939. doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. (2005). Adopting open source and open standards in the public sector: Five deciding factors behind the movement. Michigan Journal of Public Affairs, 2, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B., & Sudzina, F. (2008). ERP systems and open source: An initial review and some implications for SMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(6), 649–658. doi:10.1108/17410390810911230
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, S. (2013, October 9). Is recession ringing the open source bells?. Retrieved from http://www.itnext.in/digital_assets/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000196/IT-NEXT-Vol-04-Issue-09-October–2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, M. H., Holck, J., & Pedersen, M. K. (2004). The challenges of open source software in IT adoption: Enterprise architecture versus total cost of ownership. Proceedings of the 27th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS27), Falkenberg, Sweden, August 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. T., Kim, H. W., & Gupta, S. (2009). Measuring open source software success. Omega, 37(2), 426–438. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Tan, C.-H., & Yang, X. (2013). It is all about what we have: A discriminant analysis of organizations’ decision to adopt open source software. Decision Support Systems, 56, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundell, B., Lings, B., & Lindqvist, E. (2010). Open source in Swedish companies: Where are we?. Information Systems Journal, 20(6), 519–535. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macredie, R. D., & Mijinyawa, K. (2011). A theory-grounded framework of open source software adoption in SMEs. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 237–250. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73. doi:10.1177/0092070305281090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L., & Finnegan, P. (2010). Open innovation in secondary software firms: An exploration of managers’ perceptions of open source software. ACM SIGMIS Database, 41(1), 76–95. doi:10.1145/1719051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, T., Tuisku, M., Hameri, A.-P., & Curtin, T. (2009). Server-based computing solution based on open source software. Information Systems Management, 26(1), 77–86. doi:10.1080/10580530802552227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Yamanouchi, T. (1989). Managing innovation as a self-renewing process. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(5), 299–315. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(89)90003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173–187. doi:10.2307/249687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, F. (2011, February 8). Open-source software gives competitive advantage: Gartner survey. Retrieved from http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Open-Source-Software-Gives-Competitive-Advantage-Gartner-Survey-729638/.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, B., Russo, B., & Succi, G. (2012). Adoption of free/libre open source software in public organizations: Factors of impact. Information Technology & People, 25(2), 156–187. doi:10.1108/09593841211232677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Vijande, M. L., & Álvarez-González, L. I. (2007). Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence. Technovation, 27(9), 514–532. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrab, M., & Rehman, O. M. H. (2014). Empirical study of open source software selection for adoption, based on software quality characteristics. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2009, July 30). Open source revenues on the rise, says IDC. Retrieved from http://www.itpro.co.uk/613348/open-source-revenues-on-the-rise-says-idc.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, R. (2007). A strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary software. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 233–257. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J.-Y., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Organizational buyers‘ adoption and use of B2B electronic marketplaces: Efficiency- and legitimacy-oriented perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 55–99. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinellis, D., & Giannikas, V. (2012). Organizational adoption of open source software. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(3), 666–682. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 63.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147–169. doi:10.2307/248922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L. B., & Fleisher, M. (1990). The process of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ven, K., & Verelst, J. (2011). An empirical investigation into the assimilation of open source server software. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28, 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ven, K., & Verelst, J. (2012). A qualitative study on the organizational adoption of open source server software. Information Systems Management, 29(3), 170–187. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.687305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ven, K., Verelst, J., & Mannaert, H. (2008). Should you adopt open source software? Software, IEEE, 25(3), 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vest, J. R., & Stephens, J. H. (2013). The use and role of open source software applications in public and not-for-profit hospitals in the United States. Health Care Management Review, 38(4), 361–370. doi:10.1097/HMR.0b013e318276f9ed
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, S., Dröge, C., & Germain, R. (1999). The relationship between product customization and organizational structure. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 377–391. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00053-9
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-S., & Yang, Y.-F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), 803–815. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., & Dedrick, J. (2005, March 11–12). The effect of computerization movements upon organizational adoption of open source. Proceedings of the Social Informatics Workshop: Extending the Contributions of Professor Rob Kling to the Analysis of Computerization Movements, Irvine, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. C. (2008). Strategic supply management, quality initiatives, and organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 490–502. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar