194
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of IT-related attributional style in voluntary technology training

&

References

  • Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2007). Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature. Information & Management, 44(6), 547–567.
  • Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731–745.
  • Anderson, C. A. (1983). Motivational and performance deficits in interpersonal settings: The effect of attributional style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1136.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Fugate, M. (2006). Style in work settings: Development of a measure. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(3), 12–29.
  • Barker, T., & Frolick, M. N. (2003). ERP implementation failure: A case study. Information Systems Management, 20(4), 43–49.
  • Bellu, R. R., & Sherman, H. (1995). Predicting firm success from task motivation and attributional style: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(4), 349–364.
  • Benamati, J., & Lederer, A. (2001). Rapid information technology change, coping mechanisms, and the emerging technologies group. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 183–202.
  • Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (1999). Small talk and conversational storytelling in embodied conversational interface agents. AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence, 87–92.
  • Bridges, K. R. (2001). Using attributional style to predict academic performance: How does it compare to traditional methods? Personality and Individual Differences, 31(5), 723–730.
  • Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295.
  • Chou, H. W., Chang, H. H., Lin, Y. H., & Chou, S. B. (2014). Drivers and effects of post-implementation learning on ERP usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 35(June), 267–277.
  • Choudrie, J., & Zamani, E. D. (2016). Understanding individual user resistance and workarounds of enterprise social networks: The case of Service Ltd. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), 130–151.
  • Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–212.
  • Corr, P., & Gray, J. (1996). Attributional style as a personality factor in insurance sales performance in the UK. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 83–87.
  • Coulson, T., Shayo, C., Olfman, L., & Rohm, C. (2003). ERP training strategies: Conceptual training and the formation of accurate mental models. Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS Conference, 87–97.
  • Davis, D., & Davis, D. (1990). The effect of training techniques and personal characteristics on training end users of information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(2), 93–110.
  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  • Davis, S. A., & Bostrom, R. P. (1993). Training end users - an experimental investigation of the roles of the computer-interface and training methods. MISQ Quarterly, 17(1), 61–85.
  • Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
  • Dezdar, S., & Ainin, S. (2011). The influence of organizational factors on successful ERP implementation. Management Decision, 49(6), 911–926.
  • Dudhagundi, D. (2016). End-User Training (EUT) – An option or a must for successful ERP implementation? Retrieved from http://blog.commlabindia.com/training-solutions/erp-end-user-training
  • Eckhardt, A., Laumer, S., Maier, C., & Weitzel, T. (2016). The effect of personality on IT personnel’s job-related attitudes: Establishing a dispositional model of turnover intention across IT job types. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 48–66.
  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Gargeya, V. B., & Brady, C. (2005). Success and failure factors of adopting SAP in ERP system implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 501–516.
  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), iii–xiv.
  • Ghosh, R. (2012). A comprehensive study on ERP failures stressing on reluctance to change as a cause of failure. Journal of Marketing and Management, 3(1), 123.
  • Gordon, R. A. (2008). Attributional style and athletic performance: Strategic optimism and defensive pessimism. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(3), 336–350.
  • GrandView. (2015). ERP software market analysis by deployment. San Francisco, CA: GrandView.
  • Gravill, J., & Compeau, D. (2008). Self-regulated learning strategies and software training. Information and Management, 45(5), 288–296.
  • Gupta, S., & Bostrom, R. (2012). An investigation of the appropriation of technology-mediated training methods incorporating enactive and collaborative learning. Information Systems Research, 24(2), 454–469.
  • Hair, J. F., ., Jr, Hult, G., Ringle, T. M. C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
  • Hanrahan, S. J., & Cerin, E. (2009). Gender, level of participation, and type of sport: Differences in achievement goal orientation and attributional style. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(4), 508–512.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Heider, F. (2013). The psychology of interpersonal relations. London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Hess, T. (2009). Journal of the association for information systems designing interfaces with social presence: Using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(12), 889–919.
  • Hewitt, A. K., Foxcroft, D. R., & MacDonald, J. (2004). Multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analysis of the attributional style questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1483–1491.
  • Higgins, N. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Hay, J. L. (1999). Construct validity of attributional style: Modeling context-dependent item sets in the Attributional Style Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(5), 804–820.
  • Hitt, L., Wu, D., & Zhou, X. (2002). Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 71–98.
  • Hoovers. (2015). ELLUCIAN INC. Revenue and Financial Data. Austin, TX: ELLUCIAN INC. Revenue and Financial Data. Retrieved from.
  • Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305.
  • Ke, W., Tan, C.-H., Sia, C.-L., & Wei, -K.-K. (2012). Inducing intrinsic motivation to explore the enterprise system: The supremacy of organizational levers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(3), 257–290.
  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128.
  • Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
  • Khoumbati, K., Themistocleous, M., & Irani, Z. (2006). Evaluating the adoption of enterprise application integration in health-care organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(4), 69–108.
  • King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.
  • Laumer, S., Maier, C., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2016). User personality and resistance to mandatory information systems in organizations: A theoretical model and empirical test of dispositional resistance to change. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 67–82.
  • Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
  • Lim, E. T. K., Pan, S. L., & Tan, C. W. (2005). Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – Understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 135–149.
  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114.
  • Lounsbury, J. W., Moffitt, L., Gibson, L. W., Drost, A. W., & Stevens, M. (2007). An investigation of personality traits in relation to job and career satisfaction of information technology professionals. Journal of Information Technology, 22(2), 174–183.
  • Magee, R. G., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2010). The perceived moral qualities of web sites: Implications for persuasion processes in human-computer interaction. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 109–125.
  • Marder, A. (2016). Five steps to avoid ERP failure. Retrieved from https://blog.capterra.com/steps-to-avoid-erp-failure/
  • Martin-Krumm, C. P., Sarrazin, P. G., Peterson, C., & Famose, J.-P. (2003). Explanatory style and resilience after sports failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(7), 1685–1695.
  • McElroy, J., & Hendrickson, A. (2007). Dispositional factors in internet use: Personality versus cognitive style. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 809–820.
  • Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.
  • Nelson, R. R., & Cheney, P. H. (1987). Training end users - an exploratory-study. MIS Quarterly, 11(4), 547–559.
  • Norman, P., Collins, S., Conner, M., Martin, R., & Rance, J. (1995). Attributions, cognitions, and coping styles: Teleworkers’ reactions to work-related problems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 117–128.
  • Peterson, C., & Barrett, L. C. (1987). Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 603.
  • Peterson, C., Semmel, A., Von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6(3), 287–299.
  • Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159–166.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
  • Proudfoot, J. G., Corr, P. J., Guest, D. E., & Dunn, G. (2009). Cognitive-behavioural training to change attributional style improves employee well-being, job satisfaction, productivity, and turnover. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 147–153.
  • Proudfoot, J. G., Corr, P. J., Guest, D. E., & Gray, A. (2001). The development and evaluation of a scale to measure occupational attributional style in the financial services sector. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 259–270.
  • Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 145–182.
  • Quinzio, L., Junger, A., Gottwald, B., Benson, M., Hartmann, B., Jost, A., … Hempelmann, G. (2003). User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 20(12), 967–972.
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, UK: CSLI Publications and Cambridge university press.
  • Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). A critical look at the use of pls-sem in mis quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1.
  • Ruzich, C. M. (2008). Our deepest sympathy: An essay on computer crashes, grief, and loss. Interaction Studies, 9(3), 504–517.
  • Sah, Y. J., & Peng, W. (2015). Effects of visual and linguistic anthropomorphic cues on social perception, self-awareness, and information disclosure in a health website. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 392–401.
  • Schneider, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2016). Determinant factors of cloud-sourcing decisions: Reflecting on the IT outsourcing literature in the era of cloud computing. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 1–31.
  • Seligman, M. E., Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., & Von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88(3), 242.
  • Seligman, M. E., Castellon, C., Cacciola, J., Schulman, P., Luborsky, L., Ollove, M., & Downing, R. (1988). Explanatory style change during cognitive therapy for unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 13.
  • Seligman, M. E., & Schulman, P. (1986). Explanatory style as a predictor of productivity and quitting among life insurance sales agents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 832.
  • Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 679–704.
  • Straub, D. (2012). Does MIS have native theories? MIS Quarterly, 36, 2.
  • Straumsheim, C. (2013). Workday enters SIS market. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/09/11/workday-introduce-cloud-based-student-information-system-2014
  • Sweeney, P. D., Anderson, K., & Bailey, S. (1986). Attributional style in depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 974.
  • Thatcher, J., & Perrewe, P. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–396.
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  • Venkatesh, V., Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., Davis, F. D., Morris, M. G., & Morris, M. G. (2007). Dead or alive? the development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 267–286.
  • Venkatesh, & Speier. (1999). Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 1–28.
  • Wagner, W. P., Najdawi, M. K., & Otto, J. (2000). An empirical investigation into the impact of ERP training on cross-functional education. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 1(January2000), 107. Retrieved from http://www.abe.villanova.edu/proc2000/n107.pdf
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247.
  • Warkentin, M., & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9(4), 271–289.
  • Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
  • Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186.
  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548.
  • Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28–36.
  • Welbourne, J. L., Eggerth, D., Hartley, T. A., Andrew, M. E., & Sanchez, F. (2007). Coping strategies in the workplace: Relationships with attributional style and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 312–325.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.