811
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Post-Implementation ERP Usage: A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Control and Empowerment

, &

References

  • Afonso, C., Schwarz, A., Roldán, J., & Franco, M. J. S. (2015). EDMS use in local E-government: An analysis of the path from extent of use to overall performance. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 11(2), 18–34. doi:10.4018/IJEGR.2015040102
  • Ahuja, M. K., & Thatcher, J. (2005). Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterl, 29(3), 427–459. doi:10.2307/25148691
  • Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007). Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1232–1248. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.002
  • Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211–218. doi:10.17705/1jais
  • Berends, J., & Lammers, I. (2010). Explaining discontinuity in organizational learning: A process analysis. Organization Studies, 31(8), 1045–1068. doi:10.1177/0170840610376140
  • Birkenshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. Harvard Business Review, 4(1), 47–53.
  • Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 657–679. doi:10.2307/25148815
  • Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2015). Exploration, exploitation and public sector innovation: An organizational learning perspective for the public sector. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 139–151.
  • Cooper, R., & Zmud, R. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123–139. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123
  • Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 241. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.241
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination. Rochester, NY: Research University of Rochester Press.
  • Elmes, M., Strong, D., & Volkoff, O. (2005). Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations. Information and Organization, 15(1), 1–37. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.12.001
  • Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 1173–1193. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478255
  • Fuss, C., Gmeiner, R., Schiereck, D., & Strahringer, S. (2007). ERP usage in banking: An exploratory survey of the world’s largest banks. Information Systems Management, 24, 155–171. doi:10.1080/10580530701221056
  • Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
  • Galy, E., & Sauceda, M. (2014). Post-implementation practices of ERP systems and their relationship to financial performance. Information & Management, 51(3), 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.02.002
  • Grossman, T., & Walsh, J. (2004). Avoiding the pitfalls of ERP system implementation. Information Systems Management, 21(2), 38–42. doi:10.1201/1078/44118.21.2.20040301/80420.6
  • Grublješič, T., & Jaklič, J. (2015). Conceptualization of the business intelligence extended use model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(3), 72–82. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645774
  • Hald, K. S., & Mouritsen, J. (2013). Enterprise resource planning, operations and management: Enabling and constraining ERP and the role of the production and operations manager. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(8), 1075–1104. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-11-2011-0430
  • Hassandoust, F., Techatassanasoontorn, A. A., & Tan, F. B. (2016). Factors influencing the infusion of information systems: A literature review. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 1–32.
  • He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration versus exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
  • Hsieh, J., & Wang, W. (2007). Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 216–227. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663
  • Ifinedo, P., Rapp, B., Ifinedo, A., & Sundberg, K. (2010). Relationships among ERP post-implementation success constructs: An analysis at the organizational level. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1136–1148. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.020
  • Im, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281–1296. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0902
  • Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors asociated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 159–177. doi:10.2307/25148694
  • Kayas, O., McLean, R., Hines, T., & Wright, G. (2008). The panoptic gaze: Analyzing the interaction between enterprise resource planning technology and organizational culture. International Journal of Information Management, 28(6), 446–452. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.08.005
  • Kim, H. W., & Gupta, S. (2014). A user empowerment approach to information systems infusion. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(4), 656–668. doi:10.1109/TEM.2014.2354693
  • Kim, S. S. (2009). The integrative framework of technology use: An extension and test. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 513–537. doi:10.2307/20650307
  • Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005). A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Science, 51(5), 741–755. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0326
  • Kirsch, L. J. (2004). Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 374–395. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0036
  • Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  • Li, X., Hsieh, J. P. A., & Rai, A. (2013). Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 659–682. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0456
  • Maas, J., van Fenema, P. C., & Soeters, J. (2014). ERP system usage: The role of control and empowerment. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(1), 88–103. doi:10.1111/ntwe.2014.29.issue-1
  • Maas, J., van Fenema, P. C., & Soeters, J. (2016). ERP as an organizational innovation: Key users and cross-boundary knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 557–577. doi:10.1108/JKM-05-2015-0195
  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012, December). Using user personality to explain the intention-behavior gap and changes in beliefs: A longitudinal analysis. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando, USA. Association for Information Systems.
  • Murphy, G., & Chang, A. (2012). Differential effects of ERP systems on user outcomes - A longitudinal investigation. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(2), 147–162. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00282.x
  • Ng, E. H., & Kim, H. W. (2009). Investigating information systems infusion and the moderating role of habit: A user empowerment perspective. In ICIS Proceedings, Phoenix, USA, December 2012. Asociation for Information Systems.
  • Pao-Long, C., & Lung, S. (2002). Organizational changes for advanced manufacturing technology infusion: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 19(2), 206–217.
  • Paroutis, S., & Heracleous, L. (2013). Discourse revisited: Dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 935–956. doi:10.1002/smj.2013.34.issue-8
  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Pongpattrachai, D., Cragg, P., & Fisher, R. (2014). IT infusion within the audit process: Spreadsheet use in small audit firms. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 15(1), 26–46. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2013.03.001
  • Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603. doi:10.1037/h0037335
  • Premkumar, G. (2003). A meta-analysis of research on information technology implementation in small business. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 91–121. doi:10.1207/S15327744JOCE1302_2
  • Ramamurthy, K. R., Sen, A., & Sinha, A. P. (2008). An empirical investigation of the key determinants of data warehouse adoption. Decision Support Systems, 44(4), 817–841. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.10.006
  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–79.
  • Saeed, K. A., & Abdinnour-Helm, S. (2008). Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of information systems. Information and Management, 45(6), 376–386. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.06.002
  • Saga, V., & Zmud, R. (1994). The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization and infusion. In L. Levine (Ed.), Diffusion, transfer, and implementation of information technology (pp. 67–86). New York, NY: North Holland.
  • Schwarz, A., Chin, W. W., Hirschheim, R., & Schwarz, C. (2014). Toward a process-based view of information technology acceptance. Journal of Information Technology, 29(1), 73–96. doi:10.1057/jit.2013.31
  • Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253. doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  • Sehgal, R., & Stewart, G. (2004, August). Exploring the relationship between user empowerment and enterprise system success measures. In AMCIS Proceedings, New York, NY. Association for Information Systems.
  • Sia, S., & Tang, K. (2002). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems as a technology of power: Empowerment or panoptic control? SIGMIS Database, 33(1), 23–37. doi:10.1145/504350.504356
  • Sommer, R. (2011). Public sector ERP implementation: Successfully engaging middle-management. Communications of the IBIMA, 1(1), 1–11. doi:10.5171/2011.162439
  • Straub, D. W., & Burton-Jones, A. (2007). Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 223–229. doi:10.17705/1jais
  • Sundaram, S., Schwarz, A., Jones, E., & Chin, W. W. (2007). Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 101–112. doi:10.1007/s11747-006-0010-4
  • Tennant, V., & Mills, A. (2011, July). Investigating information system infusion at the individual level: Re-conceptualisation and operationalization. In PACIS Proceedings, Brisbane, Australia. Association for Information Systems.
  • Teoh, S., & Teo, L. (2010, July). Enterprise system implementations - A model of panoptical empowerment. In PACIS Proceedings, Taipei, Taiwan. Association for Information Systems.
  • Thatcher, J. B., McKnight, D. H., Baker, E. W., Arsal, R. E., & Roberts, N. H. (2011). The role of trust in postadoption IT exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 56–70. doi:10.1109/TEM.2009.2028320
  • Turner, S., & Rindova, V. (2012). A Balancing Act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0653
  • van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704. doi:10.2307/25148660
  • Vander Elst, T., Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2014). On the reciprocal relationship between job insecurity and employee well-being: mediation by perceived control? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 671–693. doi:10.1111/joop.2014.87.issue-4
  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
  • Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as a mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 639–656. doi:10.1348/014466605X49122
  • Wang, W., Hsieh, J. P. A., Butler, J. E., & Hsu, S.-H. (2008). Innovate with complex information technologies: A theoretical model and empirical examination. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(1), 27–36. doi:10.1080/08874417.2008.11645303
  • Zuboff, S. (1988). The age of the smart machine. London, Great-Britain: Basic Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.