The Impact of Perceived Work Complexity and Shared Leadership on Team Performance of IT Employees of South African Firms

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. W., & Dekker, H. C. (2005). Management control for market transactions: The relation between transaction characteristics, incomplete contract design, and subsequent performance. Management Science, 51(12), 1734–1752. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 541–554. doi:10.1177/1523422308319536
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., & Tommelein, I. (2012). Lean management methods for complex projects. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(1–2), 85–96. doi:10.1080/21573727.2011.641117
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2009). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Berhane, G. (2008). Participatory approach for the development of agribusiness through multi-purpose cooperatives in Degua Tembien Woreda, South Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation). Mekelle University.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Textbooks Collection. Florida: University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2011.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316. doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Bharadwaj, A., & Goh, K. Y. (2017). An empirical analysis of intellectual property right sharing in software development outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 131–161. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. B., Ullah, S. M., & Kwak, W. J. (2015). Ethical leadership and followers’ attitudes toward corporate social responsibility: The role of perceived ethical work climate. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 43(3), 353–365. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.3.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2010). Integrated project delivery: Case studies. Sacramento: The American Institute of Architects California Council.
   Google Scholar
• D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–Team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1964–1991. doi:10.1177/0149206314525205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research- What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 329–346. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00020-2
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18(4), 613–630. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausing, M., Jeppesen, H. J., Jønsson, T., Lewandowski, J., & Bligh, M. C. (2013). Moderators of shared leadership: Function and autonomy. Team Performance Management, 19(5/6), 244–262. doi:10.1108/TPM-11-2012-0038
   Google Scholar
• Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., & Piperca, S. (2016). Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1360–1383. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 115–157. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Mumford, M. D., Yammarino, F. J., & Ruark, G. A. (2014). Collectivistic leadership and George C. Marshall: A historiometric analysis of career events. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 449–467. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference (10. Baskı).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated) A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966–990. doi:10.1108/01443571111165848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 572–580. doi:10.1086/jcr.1984.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519–529. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7 ed.). New Jersey, NY: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Wolfinbarger Celsi, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. J. (2015). Essentials of business research methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modelling [White Paper] Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pd  doi.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615–632. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E. (2014). Shared leadership, diversity, and information sharing in teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29, 541–564. doi:10.1108/JMP-02-2012-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403. doi:10.1037/a0030264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., Pearce, C. L., & Welzel, L. (2010). Is the most effective team leadership shared? The impact of shared leadership, age diversity and coordination on team performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 105–116. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307–321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaques, E. (1996). The requisite organisation: A total system for effective managerial organizational and managerial leadership for the 21st century (2nd ed. ed.). Arlington, VA: Cason Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., Zhang, A., Cai, T. T., & Small, D. S. (2016). Instrumental variables estimation with some invalid instruments and its application to Mendelian randomization. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(513), 132–144. doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.994705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, N. J., Wall, T. D., Clegg, C. W., & Cordery, J. L. (1983). Autonomous work groups in a greenfield site: A comparative study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56(4), 271–288. doi:10.1111/joop.1983.56.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Kong, F., Zhao, J., & You, X. (2013). Self-esteem as mediator and moderator of the relationship between social support and subjective well-being among Chinese university students. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 151–161. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0044-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krigsman, M. (2012, April 10). Worldwide cost of IT failure (revisited): $3 trillion. ZDNet. Retrieved from https://www.zdnet.com/article/worldwide-cost-of-it-failure-revisited-3-trillion/
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Bailey, D. E., Diniz, E. H., Sholler, D., & Nardi, B. (2016). Multiplex appropriation in complex systems implementation: The case of Brazil’s correspondent banking system. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 461–473. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 434–451. doi:10.1037/apl0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luftman, J., Zadeh, H. S., Derksen, B., Santana, M., Rigoni, E. H., & Huang, Z. D. (2013). Key information technology and management issues 2012–2013: An international study. Journal of Information Technology, 28(4), 354–366. doi:10.1057/jit.2013.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson, S., Li, D., Fast-Berglund, Å., & Gong, L. (2017). Measuring operator emotion objectively at a complex final assembly station. In K. S. Hale and Stanney, K. M., Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering (pp. 223–232). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41691-5_19
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2012). The corporation is ailing social technology: Creating a ‘fit for purpose’ design for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 195–210. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1201-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2013). Leadership for sustainability: An evolution of leadership ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 369–384. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1278-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. doi:10.1177/0149206309347376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naoum, S. (2003). An overview into the concept of partnering. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 71–76. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00059-X
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 130–140. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. (2006). Does action learning promote collaborative leadership? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(2), 152–168. doi:10.5465/amle.2006.21253780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roepke, R., Agarwal, R., & Ferratt, T. W. (2000). Aligning the IT human resource with business vision: The leadership initiative at 3M. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 327–353. doi:10.2307/3250941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B. (2003). Engineering complex systems: Implications for research in systems engineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 33(2), 154–156. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2003.813335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., & Lewis, P. (2012). Doing research in business and management: An essential guide to planning your project. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, A., Rizzuto, T., Carraher-Wolverton, C., Roldan, J., & Barrera-Barrera, R. (2017). Examining the impact and detection of the “Urban Legend” of common method bias. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABSE for Advances in Information Systems, 48(1), 93–119. doi:10.1145/3051473.3051479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, R. L., Barros, E., Behnke, A., Chang, Y., Christiansen, A., Faber, A., … Weiss, H. M., (2004). MFRI Resources for Researchers. Military Research Institute at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. P., Cross, R., & Levin, D. Z. (2015). Performance benefits from providing assistance in networks relationships that generate learning. Journal of Management, 44(2), 412–444. doi:10.1177/0149206315584822
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 438–443. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Standish Group International, Inc. (2013). Chaos Manifesto: Think big, act small. Retrieved from https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/GENREF/S130301C.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tal, D., & Gordon, A. (2016). Leadership of the present, current theories of multiple involvements: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 107(1), 259–269. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1880-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, R. (2013). Effect of work complexity & individual differences on nursing IT utilization (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal, R., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., & Akin, A. (2014). Subjective vitality as mediator and moderator of the relationship between life satisfaction and subjective happiness. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 489–497.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. J., Tsai, H. T., & Tsai, M. T. (2014a). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014b). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181–198. doi:10.1037/a0034531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115–117. doi:10.1126/science.1159845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar