Board IT Governance in Context: Considering Governance Style and Environmental Dynamism Contingencies

References

• Aguilar, F. J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604–633. doi:10.2307/2393511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Feng, C. Q., & Pavlou, P. A. (2011). CIO educational background, strategic positioning, and stock performance. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1910387 doi:10.2139/ssrn.1910387
   Google Scholar
• Bart, C., & Turel, O. (2009). The role of the board in IT governance: Current and desired oversight practices. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 316–329. doi:10.1504/IJBGE.2009.023786
   Google Scholar
• Bart, C., & Turel, O. (2010). IT and the board of directors: An empirical investigation into the “governance questions” Canadian board members ask about IT. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 147–172. doi:10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.147
   Google Scholar
• Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4(1p2), 1. doi:10.1037/h0030372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaroch, M., & Chernobai, A. (2017). Operational IT failures, IT value-destruction, and board-level IT governance changes. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 729–762. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. doi:10.2307/3250983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 319–407. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology: Review and assessment. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67–77. doi:10.1145/163298.163309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541–558. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, UK: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976–997. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y. E., Huff, S. L., Barclay, D. W., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 125–150. doi:10.1287/isre.8.2.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. doi:10.1177/003803857200600101
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917–926. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 307–324. doi:10.2308/isys-50422
   Google Scholar
• de Hoogh, A., Den Hartog, D., Koopman, P., Thierry, H., van Den Berg, P., van der Weide, J., & Wilderom, C. (2004). Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 447–471. doi:10.1080/13594320444000164
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73. doi:10.2307/2393080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58(5), 1244–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327. doi:10.2307/2392145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, S. (2017). The role of the chief data officer: Managing expectations. IT Professional, 19(3), 66–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elenkov, D. S., Judge, W., & Wright, P. (2005). Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: An international multi-cluster comparative study. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 665–682. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 217–231. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, M. T. I. (2015). How can organization retain IT personnel? Impact of IT manager’s leadership on IT personnel’s intention to stay. Information Systems Management, 32(4), 316–330. doi:10.1080/10580530.2015.1080001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. doi:10.1086/260866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., & Thatcher, J. B. (2017). Can political skill enhance business and IT knowledge? Information Systems Management, 34(2), 157–171. doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1288525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1982). Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 159–174. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. doi:10.2307/2095567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, J. L., Pinsker, R. E., Smith, T. J., & Young, G. R. (2016). The relationship between board-level technology committees and reported security breaches. Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 79–98. doi:10.2308/isys-51402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, V., & McKissack, J. (2016). The emerging role of the CISO. Business Horizons, 59(6), 585–591. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IT Governance Institute. (2003). Board briefing on IT governance. Information Technology Governance Institute. http://www.itgi.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janvrin, D., & Mascha, M. F. (2014). The financial close process: Implications for future research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 15(4), 381–399. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewer, J., & McKay, K. N. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of board IT governance: Institutional and strategic choice perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 581–617. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., & Watson, R. T. (2006). Information systems leadership. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(2), 171–176. doi:10.1109/TEM.2006.872247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, G. S., & Lederer, A. L. (2004). The impact of industry contextual factors on IT focus and the use of IT for competitive advantage. Information & Management, 41(7), 899–919. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., & Lee, J. E. (2009). Audit committee financial expertise, litigation risk, and corporate governance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 241–261. doi:10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47. doi:10.2307/2391211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., & Moody, G. D. (2015). Proposing the control- reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organizational information security policies. Information Systems Journal, 25(5), 433–463. doi:10.1111/isj.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallette, P., & Hogler, R. L. (1995). Board composition, stock ownership and the exemption of directors from liability. Journal of Management, 21(5), 861–878. doi:10.1177/014920639502100503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322. doi:10.2307/25148636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143. doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, R., & McFarlan, F. W. (2005). Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M., & Kotulic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(5), 913–929. doi:10.1177/014920639502100506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225–246. doi:10.2307/25148729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. H., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1974). Failures in upward communication in organizations: Three possible culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, D., & Sales, C. A. (1994). Designing organizations. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P., & Barry, B. (1970). Organisational development: Case studies in the printing industry. London, UK: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capabilities to firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 125–153. doi:10.2307/30036521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829–1853. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31–49. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer Stuart. (2016). Spencer Stuart board index: A perspective on U.S. Boards. https://www.spencerstuart.com/$/media/pdf%20files/research%20and%20insight%20pdfs/spencer-stuart-us-board-index-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strebel, P. (2004). The case for contingent governance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2), 59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon, P. P. (2010). A service science perspective on strategic choice, IT, and performance in US banking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 219–252. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Wang, T. Y. (2011). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trites, G. (2004). Director responsibility for IT governance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(2), 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2004.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Turel, O., & Bart, C. (2014). Board-level IT governance and organizational performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 223–239. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turel, O., Liu, P., & Bart, C. (2017). Board-level information technology governance effects on organizational performance: The roles of strategic alignment and authoritarian governance style. Information Systems Management, 34(2), 117–136. doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1288523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L. (1979). Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(1), 82–98. doi:10.2307/2989877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: Achieving strategic alignment and value. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142. doi:10.2307/25148626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, D., & Yammarino, F. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 266–285. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage it decision rights for superior results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7–24. doi:10.5465/256871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010). A review of IT governance: A taxonomy to inform accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 107–146. doi:10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.107
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. P. J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T. P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497–518. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations: upper saddle river. NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. doi:10.1177/014920638901500208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., Chew, I. K., & Spangler, W. D. (2005). CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of human–Capital-enhancing human resource management. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar