189
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Should Data Structures Look Flat for End Users?

, &

References

  • Alpar, P., & Schulz, M. (2016). Self-service business intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(2), 151–155. doi:10.1007/s12599-016-0424-6
  • Arocena, P. C., Miller, R. J., & Mylopoulos, J. (2013). Vivification in BI. In Ng, R. T., Arocena, P. C., Barbosa, D., Carenini, G., Gomes, L., Jou, S., Leung, R. A., Milios, E., Miller, R. J., & Mylopoulos, J. (Eds.), Perspectives on business intelligence (pp. 33–52). San Rafael, California: Morgan & Claypool.
  • Batra, D., & Srinivasan, A. (1992). A review and analysis of the usability of data management environments. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(3), 395–417. doi:10.1016/0020-7373(92)90041-I
  • Bejar, I. I. (1986). A psychometric analysis of a three-dimensional spatial task. Princeton,New Jersey: ETS Research Report.
  • Böhringer, M., Gluchowski, P., Kurze, C., & Schieder, C. (2010). A business intelligence perspective on the future internet. Proceedings of the 16th American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (pp. 267), Lima, Peru.
  • Bowen, P. L, O'Farrell, R. A, & Rohde, F. H. (2006). Analysis of competing data structures: does ontological clarity produce better end user query performance. Journal Of The Association for Information Systems, 7(8), 22. doi:10.17705/1jais
  • Breslow, N. E. (1975). Analysis of survival data under the proportional hazards model. International Statistical Review, 43(1), 45–57. doi:10.2307/1402659
  • Chan, H. C., Teo, H. H., & Zeng, X. H. (2005). An evaluation of novice end-user computing performance: Data modeling, query writing, and comprehension. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 843–853. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
  • Chan, H. C., Wei, K. K., & Siau, K. L. (1993). User-database interface: The effect of abstraction levels on query performance. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 441–464. doi:10.2307/249587
  • Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., & Narasayya, V. (2011). An overview of business intelligence technology. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 88–98. doi:10.1145/1978542
  • Chiang, R. H. L., Goes, P., & Stohr, E. A. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics education, and program development: A unique opportunity for the information systems discipline. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 3(3), 12. doi:10.1145/2361256
  • Chimera, R., & Schneiderman, B. (1994). An exploratory evaluation of three interfaces for browsing large hierarchical tables of contents. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 12(4), 383–406. doi:10.1145/185462.185483
  • Codasyl. (1979). End-user facilities committee status report (pp. 137–163). North Holland Publishing Company, Information and Management Two. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Codd, E. F., Codd, S. B., & Salley, C. T. (1998). Providing OLAP to user-analysts: An IT mandate. White Paper.
  • Corral, K., Schuff, D., & St. Louis, R. D. (2006). The impact of alternative diagrams of the accuracy of recall: A comparison of star-schema diagrams and entity-relationship diagrams. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 450–468. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.02.003
  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
  • Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society – Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–220. doi:10.1111/rssb.1972.34.issue-2
  • Croson, R. (2007). The use of students as participants in experimental research. Working Paper.
  • Czaja, S. J., & Lee, C. C. (2009). Information technology and older adults. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Designing for diverse users and domains (pp. 17–32). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
  • Dowling, K., Schuff, D., & St. Louis, R. D. (2001). Dimensional data models versus entity relationship models: Does it make a difference to end-users? Proceedings of the 7th American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (pp. 80), Boston, USA.
  • Farber, M, & Shoham, S. (2002). Users, end‐users, and end‐user searchers of online information: a historical overview. Online Information Review, 26, 92-100. doi: 10.1108/14684520210424557
  • Feng, Q., & Miao, D. (2009). Structured prior knowledge and granular structures. In N. Zhong, K. Li, S. Lu, & L. Chen (Eds.), Brain informatics (pp. 115–126). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Ferber, R. (1948). The problem of bias in mail returns: A solution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(4), 669–676. doi:10.1086/266009
  • Gardiner, L. R. (2010). Sam’s Club – Data and SAP BI infrastructure. Retrieved from http://enterprise.waltoncollege.uark.edu/SamsClubSmallDWInfrastructure.doc
  • Gartner. (2014). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence and analytics software market grew 8 percent in 2013. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2723717
  • Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Waltham, Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Hänel, T., & Schulz, M. (2014). Is there still a need for multidimensional data models? Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Ho, A. M.-H., Dion, P. W., Ng, C. S. H., & Karmakar, M. K. (2013). Understanding immortal time bias in observational cohort studies. Anaesthesia, 68(2), 126–130. doi:10.1111/anae.12120
  • Hubert, P. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 221–233), Berkeley, USA.
  • Hung, S.-Y. (2003). Expert versus novice use of the executive support systems: An empirical study. Information & Management, 40(3), 177–189. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00003-4
  • Imhoff, C., & White, C. (2011). Self-service business intelligence – Empowering users to generate insights. TDWI Best Practice Report. Renton, Washington, USA
  • Jih, W. K., Bradbard, D. A., Snyder, C. A., & Thompson, N. G. (1989). The effects of relational and entity-relationship data models on query performance of end users. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31(3), 257–267. doi:10.1016/0020-7373(89)90007-2
  • Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2017). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
  • McFadden, D. (1979). Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behaviour of individuals: Some recent developments. In A. D. Hensher & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioral travel modeling (pp. 279–318). London: Croom Helm.
  • McLean, E. R. (1979). End users as application developers. MIS Quarterly, 3(4), 37–46. doi:10.2307/249047
  • Miller, D. P. (1981). The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (pp. 296–300), Rochester, USA.
  • Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
  • Neisser, U. (1963). Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. The American Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 376–385. doi:10.2307/1419778
  • Olszak, C. M., & Ziemba, E. (2007). Approach to building and implementing business intelligence systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 2, 135–148. doi:10.28945/105
  • Reips, U. D. (2000). The web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychology experiments on the internet (pp. 89–117). San Diego, Zürich, Switzerland: Academic Press.
  • Robertson, G., McCracken, D., & Newell, A. (1999). The ZOG approach to man-machine communication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(2), 279–306. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1980.0310
  • Sahay, B. S., & Ranjan, J. (2008). Real time business intelligence in supply chain analytics. Information Management & Computer Security, 16(1), 28–48. doi:10.1108/09685220810862733
  • Sarawagi, S., Agrawal, R., & Megiddo, N. (1998). Discovery-driven exploration of OLAP data cubes. In H. J. Schek, G. Alonso, F. Saltor, & I. Ramos (Eds.), Advances in database technology — EDBT’98. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 1377, pp. 168–182). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Schuff, D., Corral, K., & Turetken, O. (2011). Comparing the understandability of alternative data warehouse schemas: An empirical study. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.04.003
  • Serrano, M. A., Calero, C., Sahraoui, H. A., & Piattini, M. (2008). Empirical studies to assess the understandability of data warehouse schemas using structural metrics. Software Quality Journal, 16(1), 79–106. doi:10.1007/s11219-007-9030-7
  • Siau, K. L., Chan, H. C., & Wei, K. K. (2004). Effects of query complexity and learning on novice user query performance with conceptual and logical database interfaces. IEEE transactions on systems. Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 34(2), 276–281. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2003.820581
  • Snowberry, K., Parkinson, S. R., & Sisson, N. (1983). Computer display menus. Ergonomics, 26(7), 699–712. doi:10.1080/00140138308963390
  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2018). GENESIS-online datenbank. Retrieved from https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online
  • Tijsen, R., Spruit, M., van der Ridder, M., & van Raaij, B. (2011). BI-FIT: The fit between Business Intelligence end-users, tasks and technologies. In M. M. Cruz-Cunha & J. Varajao (Eds.), Enterprise information systems design, implementation and management: Organizational applications (pp. 162–177). Hershey, New York: Business Science Reference.
  • Topi, H., Valacich, J. S., & Hoffer, J. A. (2005). The effects of task complexity and time availability limitations on human performance in database query tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(3), 349–379. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.10.003
  • Truss, C., Conway, E., d’Amato, A., Kelly, G., Monks, K., Hannon, E., & Flood, P. C. (2012). Knowledge work: Gender-blind or gender-biased? Work Employment & Society, 26(5), 735–754. doi:10.1177/0950017012451675
  • van der Lans, R. F. (2012). Data virtualization for business intelligence systems – Revolutionizing data integration for data warehouses. Burlington, Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Vessey, I. (1991). Cognitive Fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 219–240. doi:10.1111/deci.1991.22.issue-2
  • Vujošević, D., Kovačević, I., Suknović, M., & Lalić, N. (2012). A comparison of the usability of performing ad hoc querying on dimensionally modeled data versus operationally modeled data. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 185–197. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.004
  • Walton College. (2006). Sam’s Club database. Retrieved from http://enterprise.waltoncollege.uark.edu/samsclub.asp
  • Watson, H. J., & Wixom, B. H. (2007). The current state of business intelligence. Computer, 40(9), 96–99. doi:10.1109/MC.2007.331
  • White, C. (2005). The next generation of business intelligence: Operational BI. DM Review, 15(5), 34–37.
  • White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50(1), 1–25. doi:10.2307/1912526
  • Yusof, S. M., & Sidi, F. (2014). Relational model vs. dimensional model – Further experimentation on understandability of the two schemas. Proceedings of the 1st Malaysian National Conference on Databases (pp. 40–45), Serdang, Malaysia. doi:10.1177/1753193413487470
  • Zaphiris, P. (2001). Age differences and the depth-breadth tradeoff in hierarchical online information systems. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Access in HCI (pp. 540–544). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.