Achieving Social IT Alignment through the Orchestration of IT Assets: An Interpretive Case Study

References

• Albers, S., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective. Journal of Management, 42(3), 582–614. doi:10.1177/0149206313488209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1‐2), 11–26. doi:10.1002/sej.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral, S., & Weil, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18(5), 763–780. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. doi:10.1177/0149206310391805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3), 367–403. doi:10.1177/014920630002600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbya, H., Leidner, D. E., & Preston, D. (2019). MISQ research curation on information systems alignment. MIS Quarterly. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5887a660b3db2b05bd09cf36/t/5deffae53d673974a3921cde/1576008422409/MISQ+curation+on+IS+Alignment–FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Besson, P., & Rowe, F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 103–124. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287–298. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. V. (1999). Horizontal mechanisms under differing is organization contexts. MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 421–454. doi:10.2307/249470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Mohan, K., Ramesh, B., & Sarkar, S. (2014). Evolution of governance: Achieving ambidexterity in IT outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 115–140. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222300305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Dewhurst, F. (2007). Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: An empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1720–1735. doi:10.1080/09585190701570882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y., & Reich, B. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22, 297–315. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, -Y.-Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676. doi:10.1108/00251741111183816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Zhao, J., George, J. F., Li, Y., & Zhai, S. (2017). The influence of relational strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity. International Journal of Information Management, 37, 43–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, T. C. (2011). Exploring call center‐enabled organizational mechanisms associated with combinative capabilities. Management Decision, 49(6), 841–859. doi:10.1108/00251741111143577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croteau, A.-M., Léger, P.-M., & Cassivi, L. (2008). The role of life cycle concepts in the assessment of interorganizational alignment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(2), 145–161. doi:10.1108/02635570810847545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., & Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16(4), 332–343. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diirr, B., & Cappelli, C. (2018). A systematic literature review to understand cross-organizational relationship management and collaboration. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 145–154). Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. doi:10.1007/s11748-017-0860-3
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Kale, P. (2007). Relational Capabilities: Drivers and Implications. In C. E. Helfat (Ed.), Dynamic capabilities understanding strategic change in organizations (pp. 65–79). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sawy, O. A., & Pavlou, P. A. (2008). IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Quarterly Executive, 7(3), 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feurer, R., Chaharbaghi, K., Weber, M., & Wargin, J. (2000). Aligning strategies, processes, and IT: A case study. Information Systems Management, 17(1), 23–34. doi:10.1201/1078/43190.17.1.20000101/31211.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36. doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., & Mähring, M. (2015). Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57–80. doi:10.1287/isre.2014.0554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571–586. doi:10.1002/smj.1975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. doi:10.1002/()1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16. doi:10.1147/sj.382.0472
   Google Scholar
• Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 755–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15(1), 70–81. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M., Ribbers, P. M., & Bettonvil, B. (2012). Human‐knowledge resources and interorganisational systems. Information Systems Journal, 22(2), 129–149. doi:10.1111/isj.2012.22.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, G., & Rai, A. (2014). IT-enabled coordination for ambidextrous interorganizational relationships. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 72–92. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, E. P., Bedics, T. A., & McCary, C. E. (2006). Operational challenges in the call center industry: A case study and resource-based framework. Managing Service Quality, 16(5), 477–500. doi:10.1108/09604520610686142
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, L., & Robey, D. (2008). Bridging social and technical interfaces in organizations: An interpretive analysis of time-space distanciation. Information & Organization, 18(3), 177–204. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppila, O.-P. (2010). Creating Ambidexterity by Integrating and Balancing Structurally Separate Interorganizational Partnerships. Strategic Organization, 8(4), 283–312. doi:10.1177/1476127010387409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., & Scott, D. (2012). Relationship benefits: Conceptualization and measurement in a business-to-business environment. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 310–339. doi:10.1177/0266242610381297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94. doi:10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229. doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2006.8.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797–818. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N. (2005). Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 109–130. doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., & Powell, P. (2003). SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: The role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 3–17. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebbecke, C., van Fenema, P. C., & Powell, P. (2016). Managing inter-organizational knowledge sharing. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(1), 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Bagherzadeh, M. (2015). A review of interorganizational collaboration dynamics. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1338–1360. doi:10.1177/0149206314563399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritan, C. A., & Brush, T. H. (2003). Heterogeneity and transferring practices: Implementing flow manufacturing in multiple plants. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 945–959. doi:10.1002/()1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritan, C. A., & Peteraf, M. A. (2011). Building a Bridge between Resource Acquisition and Resource Accumulation. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1374–1389. doi:10.1177/0149206310387675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W., Wigand, R. T., & Minton, G. (2006). Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the U.S. Residential mortgage industry. MIS Quarterly, 30, 439–465. doi:10.2307/25148768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711–724. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815. doi:10.1093/icc/dth070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 747–776. doi:10.2307/25148708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poba-Nzaou, P., & Raymond, L. (2013). Custom development as an alternative for ERP adoption by SMEs: An interpretive case study. Information Systems Management, 30(4), 319–335. doi:10.1080/10580530.2013.832963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A., & Green, P. (2016). On information technology competencies for collaborative organizational structures. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38, 377–399. doi:10.17705/1cais.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A., Green, P., & Heales, J. (2012). On IT governance structures and their effectiveness in collaborative organizational structures. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(3), 199–220. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., Sharma, R., Tallon, P., & Reynolds, P. (2012). Strategic IT alignment: An evaluation and process-level reconceptualization of the construct. Academy of Management Annual Meeting: The Informal Economy (pp. 1–32), Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Ragowsky, A., Licker, P. S., & Gefen, D. (2012). Organizational IT maturity (OITM): A measure of organizational readiness and effectiveness to obtain value from its information technology. Information Systems Management, 29, 148–160. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.662104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S. (2008). Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning, 41(5), 483–508. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, L., Bergeron, F., & Croteau, A.-M. (2013). Innovation capability and performance of manufacturing SMEs: The paradoxical effect of IT integration. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 23(3), 249–272. doi:10.1080/10919392.2013.807714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55–81. doi:10.2307/249542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113. doi:10.2307/3250980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P., & Yetton, P. (2015). Aligning business and IT strategies in multi-business organizations. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 101–118. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2009). Overview of collaborative entrepreneurship: An integrated approach between business decisions and negotiations. Group Decision & Negotiation, 18(5), 419–430. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9134-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. doi:10.1177/0149206310385695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon, P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T.-R., & Sharma, R. (2016). Business process and information technology alignment: Construct conceptualization, empirical illustration, and directions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(9), 563–589. doi:10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H., Rai, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2010). Research commentary-reframing the dominant quests of information systems strategy research for complex adaptive business systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 822–834. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., & Qrunfleh, S. (2009). IT-business alignment: A two-level analysis. Information Systems Management, 26(4), 338–349. doi:10.1080/10580530903245705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal (1986–1998), 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/()1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorgren, S., Wincent, J., & Örtqvist, D. (2012). Unleashing synergies in strategic networks of SMEs: The influence of partner fit on corporate entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 30(5), 453–471. doi:10.1177/0266242610375292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317–332. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2013.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374–388. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in is research: nature and method. European Journal Of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. doi: 10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. K., & Karahanna, E. (2013). Causal explanation in the coordinating process: A critical realist case study of federated IT governance structures. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 933–964. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar