302
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recognizing the Impact of E-Discovery Amendments on Electronic Records Management

, , &
Pages 350-356 | Published online: 26 Oct 2009

References

  • Advisory Committee Notes . 2006 . Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. , The complete text of the Federal Rules of civil procedure are available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp
  • American Bar Association (2009a). Answers to Questions about the Attorney-Client Privilege. American Bar Association (2009b). Sample document retention policy. Retrieved May 10, 2009 from http://www.abanet.org/lpm/lpt/articles/sampledocretentionpolicy.pdf Arthur Andersen, LLP v. United States (2005). 544 U.S. 696 http://www.abanet.org/media/issues/acprivilegeqa.html (Accessed: 10 May 2009 ).
  • Barker , R. M. , Cobb , A. T. and Karcher , J. 2009 . The legal implications of electronic document retention: Changing the rules . Business Horizons , 52 : 177 – 186 .
  • Bauccio , S. J. 2007 . E-Discovery: Why and How E-mail Is Changing the Way Trials Are Won and Lost, Duquesne Law Review, 45 . 269 : 271 – 290 .
  • Chong , M. 2007 . The Role of Internal Communication and Training in Infusing Corporate Values and Delivering Brand Promise: Singapore Airlines' Experience . Corporate Reputation Review , 10 ( 3 ) : 201 – 212 .
  • Cohen , A. I. and Kalbaugh , G. E. 2009 . ESI Handbook Sources, Technology and Process , New York, New York, , USA : Aspen Publishers .
  • Crist , M. P. 2006 . Preserving the Duty to Preserve: The Increasing Vulnerability of Electronic Information . 58 S.C. L. Rev. , 7
  • Danna , S. K. 2005 . The Impact of Electronic Discovery on Privilege and the Applicability of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act . 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. , 1683 : 1729
  • Favro , P. J. 2006 . A New Frontier in Electronic Discovery: Preserving and Obtaining Metadata . 13 B.U.J. Sci. & Tech., L. , 1 January
  • Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2009). Rule 26(b)(2)(B).
  • Jordan Lawrence Group (2006). LC, Survey of Corporate Records Practices http://www.jordanlawrence group.com (Accessed: 10 May 2009 ).
  • Judicial Panelists Debate Need for Rules Covering Discovery of Electronic Data (March 3, 2004). 22 Empl. Discrim. Rep. (BNA) 9, at 252.
  • Lexbe Litigation Unleashed (2007). E-Discovery and Metadata http://www.lexbe.com/hp/indepth-e-discovery-rule-metadata.htm (Accessed: 10 May 2009 ).
  • Paul , R. A. and Chung , L. H. 2008 . Brave new Cyberworld: The Employers' Legal Guide to the Interactive Internet . Labor Lawyer , 24 ( 109 ) Summer
  • Rothstein , B. , Hedges , R. and Wiggins , E. 2007 . Managing Discovery of Electronic Information: A pocket Guide for Judges , Federal Judicial Center .
  • Rowe Entertainment, Inc. v. William Morris Agency, Inc, 205 F.R.D. 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
  • Principles , Sedona . 2007 . Best Practices Recommendation and Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production. , 2nded.The Sedona Conference Working Group Series, available at http://www.thesedonaconference.org/content/miscFiles/TSC_ PRINCP_ 2nd_ed_607.pdf.
  • Torres , T. 2006 . Creating a Process-Focused retention Schedule . The Information Management Journal. , September/October
  • United States vs. Philip Morris, No. CIV.A.99–2496, 2004 WL 1627252 (D.D.C. July 21 2004).
  • Volonino , L. , Sipior , J. C. and Ward , B. T. 2007 . Managing the Lifecycle of Electronically Stored Information . Information Systems Management , 24 ( 3 ) : 231 – 238 . DOI: 10.1080/10580530701404637
  • Ward , B. T. , Sipior , J. C. , Volonino , L. and Peterson , G. . Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems . Keystone, Colorado, USA. Computer Forensics, E-Discovery, and Spoliation: Impact of the New Federal Rules , August 9–12, 2007.
  • William T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp., Inc. , 593 F.Supp. 1443, 1455 (C.D. Cal.1984).
  • Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake III) (2003). 216 F.R.D. at 322.
  • Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake IV) (2003). 220 F.R.D. 212, 217 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) .
  • Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake V) (2003). 229 F.R.D. at 430, 2004 (court acknowledging the duty of counsel in electronic litigation).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.