3,219
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What Predicts the Game Frame? Media Ownership, Electoral Context, and Campaign News

References

  • Aalberg, T., Stromback, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178.
  • Abramowitz, A. I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006). Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. house elections. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 75–88.
  • Arnold, R. D. (2004). Congress, the press, and political accountability. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Baker, C. E. (2006). Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barone, M., & Cohen, R. E. (2004). The almanac of American politics. Washington, DC: National Journal Group Press.
  • Bartels, L. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bennett, W. L. (2007). News: The politics of illusion. New York, NY: Pearson Longman Press.
  • Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York, NY: Peter Lang Press.
  • Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Bystrom, D. G., Banwart, M. C., Kaid, L. L., & Robertson, T. A. (2004). Gender and candidate communication. London, England: Routledge.
  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Chyi, H. I., & Lewis, S. (2009). Use of online newspaper sites lags behind print editions. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 38–53.
  • Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the news: News media as a political institution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication and Society, 7(2), 191–215.
  • de Vreese, C. H. (2005). The spiral of cynicism reconsidered. European Journal of Communication, 20(3), 283–301.
  • de Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. A. (2002). Cynical and engaged: Strategic campaign coverage, public opinion and mobilization in a referendum. Communication Research, 29(6), 615–641.
  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Press.
  • Dunaway, J. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1193–1202.
  • Dunaway, J. (2011a). Causes and consequences of poll-centered News coverage in the digital age: An exploratory analysis. In R. K. Goidel (Ed.), By the people, for the people: The meaning and measurement of public opinion in a digital age. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Press.
  • Dunaway, J. (2011b). Institutional effects on the information quality of campaign news. Journalism Studies, 12, 27–44.
  • Dunaway, J., & Stein, R. M. 2013. Early voting and campaign news coverage. Political Communication, 30, 278–296.
  • Editor & Publisher. (2004a). The international yearbook: The encyclopedia of the newspaper industry. New York, NY: Editor & Publisher.
  • Editor & Publisher. (2004b). Market guide. New York, NY: Editor & Publisher.
  • Editor & Publisher. (2006a). The international yearbook: The encyclopedia of the newspaper industry. New York, NY: Editor & Publisher.
  • Editor & Publisher. (2006b). Market guide. New York, NY: Editor & Publisher.
  • Editor & Publisher. (2008a). The international yearbook: The encyclopedia of the newspaper industry. New York, NY: Editor & Publisher.
  • Editor & Publisher. (2008b). Market guide. New York, NY: Editor & Publisher.
  • Fallows, J. (1997). Breaking the news. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2007). The nightly news nightmare: Television’s coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988–2004 (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Press.
  • Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. N. (2010). Advertising trends in 2010. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 8(4), Article 4. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1411
  • Fowler, L. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2009). Looking for sex in all the wrong places: Press coverage and the electoral fortunes of gubernatorial candidates. Perspectives on Politics, 7(3), 519–537.
  • Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldenberg, E. N., & Traugott, M. W. (1984). Campaigning for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
  • Graber, D. A. (1994). Why voters fail information tests: Can the hurdles be overcome? Political Communication, 11, 331–346.
  • Gross, K., & Brewer, P. (2004, April). The effect of game and policy framing in coverage of the policy process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hood, L. (2007). Radio reverb: The impact of “local” news reimported to its own community. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51(1), 1–19.
  • Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175.
  • Jones, A. (2009). Losing the news: The future of the news that feeds democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Kahn, K. F. (1991). Senate elections in the news: Examining campaign coverage. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(3), 349–374.
  • Kahn, K. F. (1995). Characteristics of press coverage in Senate and gubernatorial elections: Information available to voters. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(1), 23–35.
  • Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (2002). The slant of the news: How editorial endorsements influence campaign coverage and citizens’ views of candidates. American Political Science Review, 96, 381–394.
  • Kaplan, M., Goldstein, K., & Hale, M. (2005). Local news coverage of the 2004 campaigns: An analysis of nightly news broadcasts. A report for the Lear Center Local News Archive, a project of the USC Annenberg School and the University of Wisconsin. Los Angeles, CA: Lear Center. Retrieved from https://www.localnewsarchive.org/pdf/LCLNAFinal2004.pdf
  • Kerbel, M., Apee, S., & Ross, M. (2000). PBS ain’t so different. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(4), 8–29.
  • Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Cambridge: Zone Books.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
  • Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17, 93–114.
  • Magleby, D. B. (2006). Change and continuity in the financing of federal elections. In D. B. Magleby, A. Corrado, & K. D. Patterson (Eds.), Financing the 2004 elections (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Brookings.
  • McManus, J. H. (1994). Market driven journalism: Let the citizens beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Miller, G. J. (1992). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Napoli, P. M. (2002, August). Television station ownership and characteristics and commitment to public service: An analysis of public affairs programming. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Miami, FL.
  • Noam, E. (2009). Media ownership and concentration in America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order: An incisive and boldly original critique of the news media’s domination of America’s political process. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2012). The state of the news media 2012. Retrieved from http://stateofthemedia.org/files/2012/08/2012_sotm_annual_report.pdf
  • Pew Research Center. (2007). The invisible primary—invisible no longer. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/node/8187
  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robinson, M. J., & Clancey, M. (1985). Teflon politics. Public Opinion, 17, 14–18.
  • Rosen, J. (2008). Tomgram: Jay Rosen, mindlessness in the media, campaign 2008. Retrieved from http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174883/
  • Rosenstiel, T. (2005). Political polling and the new media culture: A case of more being less. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 698–715.
  • Schaffner, B. F. (2005). Media coverage: The local effects of deregulation. In M. J. Streb (Ed.), Law and election politics: The rules of the game (pp. 77–95). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. White Plains, NY: Longman Press.
  • Sparrow, B. (1999). Uncertain guardians: The news media as a political institution. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Tuchman, G. (1980). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18(4), 347–367.
  • Valentino, N. A., Buhr, T. A., & Beckmann, M. N. (2001). When the frame is the game: Revisiting the impact of “strategic” campaign coverage on citizens’ information retention. Journalism and & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 93–112.
  • Van der Wurff, R. (2008). The impact of the Internet on media content. In L. Kung, R. G. Picard, & R. Towse (Eds.), The Internet and the mass media (pp. 65–85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
  • Van der Wurff, R., & Lauf, E. (2005). Print and online newspapers in Europe: A comparative analysis in 16 countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Het Spinhuis.
  • Westlye, M. C. (1991). Senate elections and campaign intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Wirth, M. O., & Wollert, J. (1979). Public interest programming: Taxation by regulation. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 319–330.
  • Yang, M. J., & Chyi, H. I. (2011). Competing with whom? Where? And why (not)? An empirical study of U.S. online newspapers’ competition dynamics. Journal of Media Business Studies, 8(4), 59–74.
  • Zaller, J. R. (1999). A theory of media politics: How the interests of politicians, journalists, and citizens shapes the news. Unpublished manuscript, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Zhao, X., & Bleske, G. L. (1998). Horse-race polls and audience issue learning. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(4), 13–34.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.