Ties, Likes, and Tweets: Using Strong and Weak Ties to Explain Differences in Protest Participation Across Facebook and Twitter Use

References

• Arriagada, A., Correa, T., Scherman, A., & Abarzúa, J. (2015). Santiago is not Chile: Gaps, practices, and perceptions of media representation in Chilean audiences. Cuadernos.info, (37), 63–75. doi:10.7764/cdi.37.769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baybeck, B., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). Urban contexts, spatially dispersed networks, and the diffusion of political information. Political Geography, 21, 195–220. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00056-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 352–369. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.709045
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Dalrymple, K. E. (2016). Politics in 140 characters or less: Campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter. Journal of Political Marketing, 15, 311–332. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.959686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. doi:10.1038/nature11421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites and networked publics: Affordances, dynamics and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 1164–1180. doi:10.1177/1461444812440159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2014). Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4187–4196). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557094
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. E., Marsden, P. V., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8, 97–117. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(86)80017-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2011). Political involvement in “mobilized” society: The interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. Journal of Communication, 61, 1005–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D. (2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334, 1269–1272. doi:10.1126/science.1207055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comunello, F., Mulargia, S., & Parisi, L. (2016). The “proper” way to spread ideas through social media: Exploring the affordances and constraints of different social media platforms as perceived by Italian activists. The Sociological Review, 64, 515–532. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 1095–1107. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Pavez, I., & Contreras, J. (2017). Beyond access: A relational and resource-based model of household Internet adoption in isolated communities. Telecommunications Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Sickle, A., & Weldon, S. (2009). The individual-institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 51–73. doi:10.1017/S000712340999038X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, T., Weeks, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2016). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1875–1895. doi:10.1177/1461444815616224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
   Google Scholar
• Dylko, I. B. (2010). An examination of methodological and theoretical problems arising from the use of political participation indexes in political communication research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 523–534. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social media affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S.Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–237). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 757–774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205–224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 79–84). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/108844.108856
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Attributes of interpersonal political discussion as antecedents of cognitive elaboration. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 157, 65–84. doi:10.5477/cis/reis.157.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Bachmann, I., Hsu, S. H., & Brundidge, J. (2013). Expressive vs. consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538–1559. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421. doi:10.1177/0093650210384984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. doi:10.2307/202051
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1159–1168. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanpour, N. (2014). Media disruption and revolutionary unrest: Evidence from Mubarak’s quasi-experiment. Political Communication, 31, 1–24. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M., Vásquez, J., Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., & Arriagada, E. (2016). One-step, two-step, network-step? Complementary perspectives on communication flows in Twittered citizen protests. Social Science Computer Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894439316639561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010, January–February). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2014). Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New Media & Society, 16, 1154–1168. doi:10.1177/1461444814544001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, C. B. (1994). The microenvironment of attitude change. The Journal of Politics, 56, 715–728. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2132189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Chen, H. (2015). Discussion network heterogeneity matters: Examining a moderated mediation model of social media use and civic engagement. International Journal of Communication, 9, 2344–2365. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Due Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19, 567–584. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latinobarometer. (2013). Latinobarómetro 2013 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Musick, M., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, S. (2013). Revolution stalled: The political limits of the Internet in the post-Soviet sphere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2014). Egocentric publics and perceptions of the world around us. In H. Gil de Zúñiga (Ed.), New technologies and civic engagement: New agendas in communication (pp. 93–102). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, L., & Orefice, M. (2016). Comparing Facebook and Twitter during the 2013 general election in Italy. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 434–446). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. (2014). Anti-politics in action? Measurement dilemmas in the study of unconventional political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 574–588. doi:10.1177/1065912914530513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servel. (2016). Participación electoral [Electoral participation]. Retrieved from: https://www.servel.cl/participacion-electoral/
   Google Scholar
• Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18, 1817–1839. doi:10.1177/1461444815616221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 872–895. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somma, N. M. (2009). How strong are strong ties? The conditional effectiveness of strong ties in protest recruitment attempts. Sociological Perspectives, 52, 289–308. doi:10.1525/sop.2009.52.3.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somma, N. M. (2017). Discontent, collective protest, and social movements in Chile. In A. Joignant, M. Morales, & C. Fuentes (Eds.), Malaise in representation in Latin American countries: Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay (pp. 47–68). New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Straits, B. C. (1991). Bringing strong ties back in interpersonal gateways to political information and influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 432–448. doi:10.1086/269272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 763–773. doi:10.1177/0894439313490625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36, 143–189. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., & Arriagada, A. (2011). Politics without citizens? Public opinion, television news, the president and real-world factors in Chile 2000–2005. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 357–381. doi:10.1177/1940161210379636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2014). Facebook, Twitter and youth engagement: A quasi-experimental study of social media use and protest behavior using propensity score matching. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2046–2070. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 163–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Somma, N., Scherman, A., & Arriagada, A. (2016). Social media in Latin America: Deepening or bridging gaps in protest participation? Online Information Review, 40, 695–711. doi:10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 227–252. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57, 704–718. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2014). Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication & Society, 27(4), 33–48. doi:10.15581/003.27.4.33-48
   Google Scholar