Issue Consistency? Comparing Television Advertising, Tweets, and E-mail in the 2014 Senate Campaigns

References

• Arceneaux, N., & Schmitz Weiss, A. (2010). Seems stupid until you try it: Press coverage of Twitter, 2006–9. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1262–1279. doi:10.1177/1461444809360773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, A. O., Hillygus, D. S., & Konitzer, T. (2016). Campaigning online: Web display ads in the 2012 presidential campaign. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(03), 414–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banda, K. K. (2015). Competition and the dynamics of issue convergence. American Politics Research, 43(5), 821–845. doi:10.1177/1532673X14564570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., & Rivero, G. (2015). Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 712–729. doi:10.1177/0894439314558836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2013). Presidential communication strategies in the age of three medias. In R. L. Fox & J. M. Ramos (Eds.), iPolitics: Citizens, elections, and governing in the new media era (pp. 183–205). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in US elections. Newyork, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., Bode, L., Lassen, D. S., Lassen, D. S., Kim, Y. M., Kim, Y. M.,… Fowler, E. F. (2016). Coherent campaigns? Campaign broadcast and social messaging. Online Information Review, 40(5), 580–594. doi:10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Dalrymple, K. E. (2016). Politics in 140 characters or less: Campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(4), 311–332. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.959686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Paper presented at the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, January 6.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2009). Campaign communications in U.S. congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 103(03), 343–366. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2011). Mapping parties’ issue agenda in different channels of campaign communication: A wild goose chase? Javnost-The Public, 18(1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/13183222.2011.11009050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. N. (2009). Local television and newspaper coverage of political advertising. Political Communication, 26(2), 119–136. doi:10.1080/10584600902850635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. N. (2013). Negative, angry, and ubiquitous: Political advertising in 2012. The Forum, 10(4), 51–61. doi:10.1515/forum-2013-0004
   Google Scholar
• Franz, M. (2012). Targeting campaign messages: Good for campaigns but bad for America? In T. Ridout (Ed.), New directions in media and politics (pp. 113–131). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (2012). The news media and the rise of negativity in presidential campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(03), 422–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2008). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. (2010). The dynamics of agenda convergence and the paradox of competitiveness in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 594–611. doi:10.1177/1065912909331426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D., & Schaffner, B. F. (2013). Targeted campaign appeals and the value of ambiguity. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 520–534. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Issenberg, S. (2012). The victory lab: The secret science of winning campaigns. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., & Krueger, B. S. (2012). Analyzing the capacity of unsolicited political email. In C. R. Livermore (Ed.), E-politics and organizational implications of the Internet: Power, influence, and social change (pp. 220–244). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, T. (2016). Emails for the base and TV ads for swing voters? Campaign targeting across communication channels. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, N., Park, D. K., & Ridout, T. N. (2006). Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 724–736. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2014). The reason why your inbox is flooded with political e-mail. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/12/02/the-reason-why-yourinbox-is-flooded-with-political-e-mail/
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1473–1490. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, B. S. (2006). A comparison of conventional and Internet political mobilization. American Politics Research, 34(6), 759–776. doi:10.1177/1532673X06290911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, K. (2013). Issue convergence is nothing more than issue convergence. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 843–855. doi:10.1177/1065912913477735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M., & Peress, M. (2015). Targeting political advertising on television. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(3), 391–432. doi:10.1561/100.00014107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N., Michelson, M. R., & Valenzuela, A. A. (2012). Emails from official sources can increase turnout. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(3), 321–332. doi:10.1561/100.00011073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, D. W. (2007). Does email boost turnout?Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(4), 369–380. doi:10.1561/100.00007032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2003). Preaching to the converted? Pluralism, participation and party websites. Party Politics, 9(1), 21–45. doi:10.1177/135406880391003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2006). Did the media matter? Agenda-setting, persuasion and mobilization effects in the British general election campaign. British Politics, 1(2), 195–221. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200022
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, C., & Bergan, D. (2006). Contributions and contributors in the 2004 presidential election cycle. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(2), 155–171. doi:10.1111/psq.2006.36.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H. (2014). The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society, 16(3), 434–450. doi:10.1177/1461444813487955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, N. (2012). Which presidential candidate is ruling the email election? Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2012/10/18/election-emailing/#uL19nl39.gqh
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K. (2011). Search and email still top the list of most popular online activities. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ridout, T. N., Franz, M., Goldstein, K. M., & Feltus, W. J. (2012). Separation by television program: Understanding the targeting of political advertising in presidential elections. Political Communication, 29(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.619509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout, T. N., Franz, M. M., & Fowler, E. F. (2014). Advances in the study of political advertising. Journal of Political Marketing, 13(3), 175–194. doi:10.1080/15377857.2014.929889
   Google Scholar
• Russmann, U. (2017). Negative campaigning in party-controlled communication channels: Party communication strategies in campaign posters, newspaper advertisement, and press releases during the 2008 Austrian national election campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serazio, M. (2014). The new media designs of political consultants: Campaign production in a fragmented era. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 743–763. doi:10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36(03), 407–436. doi:10.1017/S0007123406000226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, L., & Buell, E. H. (2004). Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960–2000. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 650–661. doi:10.1111/ajps.2004.48.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2014). You’ve got (no) mail: How parties and candidates respond to e-mail inquiries in Western democracies. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 245–258. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.899536
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2010). Negative campaigning across different communication channels: Different ball games? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 441–461. doi:10.1177/1940161210374122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P., & Maiorescu, R. (2015). Evaluating textual and technical interactivity in candidate e-mail messages during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. In J. A. Hendricks & D. Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media (pp. 171–184). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P., & Trammell, K. D. (2005). Candidate campaign e-mail messages in the presidential election 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(4), 560–574. doi:10.1177/0002764205279438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar