More Bang for the Buck: Media Freedom and Organizational Strategies in the Agenda-Setting of Human Rights Groups

References

• Albæk, E. (2011). The interaction between experts and journalists in news journalism. Journalism, 12(3), 335–348. doi:10.1177/1464884910392851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866. doi:10.1177/0003122410386689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. L., Lovett, J., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Measuring the media agenda. Political Communication, 31(2), 355–380. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.828139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S., & Boydstun, A. E. (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(1), 38–57. doi:10.1086/268900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–125. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (1996). An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication, 13(4), 373–384. doi:10.1080/10584609.1996.9963126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., & Livingston, S. (2006). None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467–485. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J. (2013). Why interest organizations do what they do: Assessing the explanatory potential of ‘exchange’ approaches. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(2), 227–250. doi:10.1057/iga.2013.6
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (1999). The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. (2004). Voice and access: political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211–240. doi:10.1177/1465116504042442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., Eising, R., & Maloney, W. (2008). Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know? West European Politics, 31(6), 1103–1128. doi:10.1080/01402380802370443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S. (2008). Different groups, different strategies: How interest groups pursue their political ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(2), 173–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S. (2012). Interest groups in the media: Bias and diversity over time. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 117–139. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2012.51.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S., Bonafont, L. C., & Halpin, D. R. (2017). Diversity in the news? A study of interest groups in the media in the UK, Spain and Denmark. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 313–328. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 28(1), 95–112. doi:10.1111/gove.2015.28.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S., & Pedersen, H. H. (2017). The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK. Acta Politica. doi:10.1057/s41269-017-0076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2004.43.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydstun, A. E. (2013). Making the news: Politics, the media, and agenda setting. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danielian, L. H., & Page, B. I. (1994). The heavenly chorus: Interest group voices on TV news. American Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 1056. doi:10.2307/2111732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Roberts, A., & Carroll, D. J. (2010). Using international law to assess elections. Democratization, 17(3), 416–441. doi:10.1080/13510341003700253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2015). Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European News Media. Political Communication, 32(3), 453–474. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.958259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, L. M., & Tallberg, J. (2017). Advocacy strategies in global governance: Inside versus outside lobbying. Political Studies, 65(3), 705–723. doi:10.1177/0032321716684356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology-the issue-attention cycle. The Public Interest, 28, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2013). Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in five European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 52(5), 660–686. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2013.52.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, T. A., Amenta, E., & Caren, N. (2016). Recipes for attention: Policy reforms, crises, organizational characteristics, and the newspaper coverage of the LGBT Movement, 1969–2009. Sociological Forum, 31(4), 926–947. doi:10.1111/socf.2016.31.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, N. (2010). NGOs, new media and the mainstream news: News from everywhere. In N. Fenton (Ed.), New media, old news: Journalism & democracy in the digital age (pp. 153–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news the presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. doi:10.1177/002234336500200104
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114–125. doi:10.1177/0002716293528001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. A., & Lake, D. A. (2012). Beyond virtue: Evaluating and enhancing the credibility of non-governmental organizations. In P. A. Gourevitch, D. A. Lake, & J. G. Stein (Eds.), The credibility of transnational NGOs. When virtue is not enough (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Walgrave, S. (2014). Political agenda setting: An approach to studying political systems. In C. Green-Pedersen & S. Walgrave (Eds.), Agenda setting, policies, and political systems: A comparative approach (pp. 1–16). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grömping, M. (2017). Domestic election monitoring and advocacy: An emerging research agenda. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 35(4), 407–423. doi:10.1080/18918131.2017.1401776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. (2013). Making human rights a reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halpin, D. R. (2014). The organization of political interest groups: Designing advocacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halpin, D. R., & Binderkrantz, A. S. (2011). Explaining breadth of policy engagement: Patterns of interest group mobilization in public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(2), 201–219. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.544499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., Beyers, J., & De Bruycker, I. (2016). Balancing inside and outside lobbying: The political strategies of lobbyists at global diplomatic conferences. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 568–588. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289. doi:10.1017/S1537592711000892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems – A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. doi:10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, S. (2005). The idea of the book. In S. Høyer & H. Pöttker (Eds.), Diffusion of the news paradigm 1850-2000 (pp. 9–16). Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Mellado, C., Arroyave, J., Benitez, J. L., de Beer, A., Garcés, M., … Márquez-Ramírez, M. (2017). Expanding influences research to insecure democracies. Journalism Studies, 18(5), 645–665. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1266278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, S. D. (2012). Why believe international election monitors? In P. A. Gourevitch, D. A. Lake, & J. Gross Stein (Eds.), The credibility of transnational NGOs. When virtue is not enough (pp. 37–61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M. (2016). Two logics of NGO advocacy: Understanding inside and outside lobbying on EU environmental policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(2), 236–254. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1041416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. G. (2012). Monitoring democracy: When international election observation works, and why it often fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Rietberg, E. M. (1995). Parties, media, the public and the economy - Patterns of societal agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 28(1), 95–118. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2012). Informational lobbying in the European Union: The effect of organisational characteristics. West European Politics, 35(3), 491. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.665737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Saurugger, S. (2013). Opening the black box: The professionalization of interest groups in the European Union. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(2), 185–205. doi:10.1057/iga.2013.2
   Google Scholar
• Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3/4), 367–391. doi:10.1023/B:RYSO.0000038603.34963.de
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. G. (2000). The politics of force: Media and the construction of police brutality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715. doi:10.2307/2009452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86. doi:10.1177/0899764014561796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, W. A. (2015). Organizational populations: Professionalization, maintenance and democratic delivery. In D. Lowery, D. Halpin, & V. Gray (Eds.), The organization ecology of interest communities. Assessment and Agenda (pp. 99–116). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. A., & Albert, K. (2015). If it leads, it bleeds (and if it bleeds, it leads): Media coverage and fatalities in militarized interstate disputes. Political Communication, 32(1), 61–82. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.880976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A. (2017). The Fourth Estate. In P. Norris & A. Nai (Eds.), Election watchdogs. Transparency, accountability, and integrity (pp. 191–210). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2013). The new research agenda studying electoral integrity. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 563–575. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., Wynter, T., & Grömping, M. (2017). Perceptions of electoral integrity, (PEI-5.5) (Publication no. 10.7910/DVN/EWYTZ7). from Harvard Dataverse doi: 10.7910/DVN/EWYTZ7
   Google Scholar
• Powers, M. (2018). NGOs as newsmakers. The changing landscape of International News. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, H., Ron, J., & Thoms, O. N. T. (2007). Shaping the northern media’s human rights coverage, 1986-2000. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 385–406. doi:10.1177/0022343307078943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. (2001). Understanding the global journalist: A hierarchy-of-influences approach. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 173–187. doi:10.1080/14616700118394
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D. A., Kail, B., Taylor, M., & Conn, S. (2012). Outside the mainstream: Social movement organization media coverage in mainstream and partisan news outlets. In J. Earl & D. A. Rohlinger (Eds.), Media, movements, and political change (pp. 51–80). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, J., Golden, S., Crow, D., & Pandya, A. (2017). Taking root: Public opinion and human rights in the Global South. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, J., Ramos, H., & Rodgers, K. (2005). Transnational information politics: NGO human rights reporting, 1986-2000. International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 557–587. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seguin, C. (2016). Cascades of coverage: Dynamics of media attention to social movement organizations. Social Forces, 94(3), 997–1020. doi:10.1093/sf/sov085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2012). The gatekeeping function: Distributions of information in media and the Real World. Journal of Politics, 74(2), 514–528. doi:10.1017/S002238161100171X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanig, P. (2015). Regulation of speech and media coverage of corruption: An empirical analysis of the Mexican Press. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 175–193. doi:10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S. (2015). Democracy, autocracy and the news: The impact of regime type on media freedom. Democratization, 22(7), 1273–1295. doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.964643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockmann, D. (2012). Media commercialization and authoritarian rule in China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrall, T. A. (2006). The myth of the outside strategy: Mass media news coverage of interest groups. Political Communication, 23(4), 407–420. doi:10.1080/10584600600976989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrall, T. A., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May we have your attention please? Human-Rights NGOs and the problem of global communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159. doi:10.1177/1940161213519132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresch, A., & Fischer, M. (2015). In search of political influence: Outside lobbying behaviour and media coverage of social movements, interest groups and political parties in six Western European countries. International Political Science Review, 36(4), 355–372. doi:10.1177/0192512113505627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518. doi:10.1111/jcom.2016.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2007). Real-world indicators and the coverage of immigration and the integration of minorities in dutch newspapers. European Journal of Communication, 22(3), 293–314. doi:10.1177/0267323107079676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2011). Can NGOs change the news? International Journal of Communication, 5, 24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23(3), 333–354. doi:10.1080/10584600600808927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar