Opting Out of Political Discussions

References

• Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, R., & Ryan, J. B. (2010). Communication, influence, and informational asymmetries among voters. Political Psychology, 31(5), 763–787. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00783.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, R., & Ryan, J. B. (2014). Experts, activists, and democratic politics: Are electorates self-educating? Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 57–73. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 99–119. doi:10.1017/S0007123400000053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. working paper. The social and psychological repercussions of choosing knowledgeable political informants: Evidence from three experiments.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91. doi:10.2307/1955648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21–62. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation form a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082–1103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (2013). What does “political” mean to you? Political Behavior, 35(3), 453–479. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9212-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012). Disagreement and the avoidance of political discussion: Aggregate relationships and differences across personality traits. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 849–874. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Valenzuela, S., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Motivations for political discussion: Antecedents and consequences on civic engagement. Human Communication Research, 42, 533–552. doi:10.1111/hcre.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 611. doi:10.1037/a0020697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S. (2002). The social-psychological measurement of partisanship. Political Behavior, 24(3), 171–197. doi:10.1023/A:1021859907145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Matthes, J., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2013). Stimulating the quasi-statistical organ: Fear of social isolation motivates the quest for knowledge of the opinion climate. Communication Research, 40(4), 439–462. doi:10.1177/0093650211428608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, W. R. (2018). Major life events and the age-partisan stability association. Political Behavior, 1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 24(4), 65–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R. R. (1983). Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: Environmental constraints on friendship choice. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 651–669. doi:10.1086/227908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. doi:10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, S., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 379–390.
   Google Scholar
• Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. S. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(Spring), 59–80. doi:10.1017/xps.2014.7
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R., Due, L., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2015). ‘I disrespectfully agree’: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. doi:10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski., C. (2018). The ‘Spiral of Silence’ revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 3–33. doi:10.1177/0093650217745429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2, 109–138. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (1998). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x
   Google Scholar
• Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout? Political Studies, 59(3), 674–692. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. The Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, B. M. (2015). The social identity politics of peer networks. American Politics Research, 43(4), 680–707. doi:10.1177/1532673X14546856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, E. O. (2010). Explicit evidence on the import of implicit attitudes: The IAT and immigration policy judgments. Political Behavior, 32(4), 517–545. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9115-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietryka, M. T. (2016). Accuracy motivations, predispositions, and social information in political discussion networks. Political Psychology, 37(3), 367–386. doi:10.1111/pops.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338. doi:10.1080/10584600490481389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle, J. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Minozzi, W., Lazer, D., Neblo, M. A., & Ognyanova, K. (2016). The accidental pundit: Intention and opportunity in political discussion. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Political Networks Workshops & Conference (PolNet 2016). Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2796448
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theiss-Morse, E. (2009). Who counts as an American?: The boundaries of national identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, C., Cramer, K. J., Wagner, M. W., German Alvarez, L. A., Friedland, D. V., Shah, L. B., … Franklin, C. (2017). When we stop talking politics: The maintenance and closing of conversation in contentious times. Journal of Communication, 67, 131–157. doi:10.1111/jcom.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar