20,448
Views
91
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election

References

  • Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211–236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  • Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Barrera, O., Guriev, S., Henry, E., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2018). Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3004631
  • Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24, 117–150. doi:10.1023/A:1021226224601
  • Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33, 122–139. doi:10.1177/0267323118760317
  • Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
  • Choi, J. (2016). Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens’ news-related activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 249–256. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.006
  • Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 49–70. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550
  • Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
  • Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
  • Craft, S., Ashley, S., & Maksl, A. (2017). News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public, 2, 388–401. doi:10.1177/2057047317725539
  • Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238–257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251
  • DiFonzo, N., Beckstead, J. W., Stupak, N., & Walders, K. (2016). Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: The shape of the truth effect. Social Influence, 11, 22–39. doi:10.1080/15534510.2015.1137224
  • Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435–457. doi:10.1017/S0007123400008309
  • Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1–20. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
  • Ernst, N., Kühne, R., & Wirth, W. (2017). Effects of message repetition and negativity on credibility judgments and political attitudes. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3265–3285.
  • Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  • Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
  • Gelfert, A. (2018). Fake news: A definition. Informal Logic, 38, 84–117. doi:10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
  • Gibson, T. A. (2018). The post-truth double helix: Reflexivity and mistrust in local politics. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3167–3185.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazar, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363, 374–378. doi:10.1126/science.aau2706
  • Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Brussels, Belgium: European Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fake-news-2016.pdf
  • Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of posttruth, postpolitics, and attention economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8, 327–333. doi:10.1111/cccr.12097
  • Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107–112. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1
  • Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hooghe, M., Marien, S., & Pauwels, T. (2011). Where do distrusting voters turn if there is no viable exit or voice option? The impact of political trust on electoral behaviour in the Belgian regional elections of June 2009. Government and Opposition, 46, 245–273. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01338.x
  • Humprecht, E. (2019). Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four Western democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 22, 1973–1988. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241
  • Igartua, J. J., & Cheng, L. (2009). Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration: Is the framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication, 59, 726–749. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01454.x
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1979). Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data. In K. G. Jöreskog & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models (pp. 129–169). Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
  • Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 3–34. doi:10.3102/0002831216679817
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Koch, T., & Zerback, T. (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63, 993–1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
  • Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34, 231–252. doi:10.1177/0093650206298071
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., … Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science, 359, 1094–1096. doi:10.1126/science.aao2998
  • Levy, N. (2017). The bad news about fake news. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 6(8), 20–36. Retrieved from https://social-epistemology.com/2017/07/24/the-bad-news-about-fake-news-neil-levy/
  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 353–369. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.
  • Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. New York, NY: Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/
  • Matthes, J. (2005). The need for orientation towards news media: Revising and validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 422–444. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh118
  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Meirick, P. C., & Bessarabova, E. (2016). Epistemic factors in selective exposure and political misperceptions on the right and left. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 16, 36–68. doi:10.1111/asap.12101
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2958246
  • Polage, D. C. (2012). Making up history: False memories of fake news stories. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 245–250. doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i2.456
  • Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2019). How to measure generalized trust in news media? An adaptation and test of scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 13, 26–42. doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1506021
  • Reedy, J., Wells, C., & Gastil, J. (2014). How voters become misinformed: An investigation of the emergence and consequences of false factual beliefs. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 1399–1418. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12102
  • Simmel, G. (2004). The philosophy of money (third enlarged ed., D. Frisby, Ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012
  • Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., & Furnham, A. (2018). To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. British Journal of Psychology, 109, 156–179. doi:10.1111/bjop.12252
  • Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 160802. doi:10.1098/rsos.160802
  • Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018a). Defining “fake news”. A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6, 137–153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
  • Tandoc, E. C., Jr, Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Zheng Wei, L. (2018b). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society, 20, 2745–2763. doi:10.1177/1461444817731756
  • Tsfati, Y. (2010). Online news exposure and trust in the mainstream media: Exploring possible associations. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 22–42. doi:10.1177/0002764210376309
  • Tsfati, Y., & Peri, Y. (2006). Mainstream media skepticism and exposure to sectorial and extranational news media: The case of Israel. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 165–187. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0902_3
  • Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 57–71. doi:10.1177/1065912915621621
  • Van Spanje, J., & de Vreese, C. (2014). Europhile media and Eurosceptic voting: Effects of news media coverage on Eurosceptic voting in the 2009 European parliamentary elections. Political Communication, 31, 325–354. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.828137
  • Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making (Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
  • Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7, 361–376. doi:10.1177/009365028000700305
  • Weedon, J., Nuland, W., & Stamos, A. (2017). Information operations and Facebook. Menlo Park, CA: Facebook, Inc. Retrieved from https://fbnewsroomus.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/facebook-and-information-operations-v1.pdf
  • Weeks, B. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2014). Electoral consequences of political rumors: Motivated reasoning, candidate rumors, and vote choice during the 2008 US presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 401–422. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu005
  • Wells, C., Reedy, J., Gastil, J., & Lee, C. (2009). Information distortion and voting choices: The origins and effects of factual beliefs in initiative elections. Political Psychology, 30, 953–969. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00735.x
  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Winter, S., Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2016). Selective use of news cues: A multiple motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. Journal of Communication, 66, 669–693. doi:10.1111/jcom.1224